FL/OH/PA/NC-Quinnipiac: Tied in FL, Trump lead in OH, Clinton lead in PA/NC
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 18, 2024, 11:03:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  FL/OH/PA/NC-Quinnipiac: Tied in FL, Trump lead in OH, Clinton lead in PA/NC
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: FL/OH/PA/NC-Quinnipiac: Tied in FL, Trump lead in OH, Clinton lead in PA/NC  (Read 5939 times)
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 08, 2016, 01:38:29 PM »
« edited: September 08, 2016, 01:46:27 PM by Castro »

Florida
Clinton - 47%
Trump - 47%

Clinton - 43%
Trump - 43%
Johnson - 8%
Stein - 2%

Ohio
Trump - 46%
Clinton - 45%

Trump - 41%
Clinton - 37%
Johnson - 14%
Stein - 4%

Pennsylvania
Clinton - 48%
Trump - 43%

Clinton - 44%
Trump - 39%
Johnson - 9%
Stein - 3%

North Carolina
Clinton - 47%
Trump - 43%

Clinton - 42%
Trump - 38%
Johnson - 15%

From August 29 - September 7, Quinnipiac University surveyed:
761 Florida likely voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.6 percentage points;
751 North Carolina likely voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.6 percentage points;
775 Ohio likely voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.5 percentage points;
778 Pennsylvania likely voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.5 percentage points

https://www.qu.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2376
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,741
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2016, 01:40:53 PM »

Yep, I've had an awful feeling about NC for awhile. Trump will lose it. :/
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,202


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2016, 01:41:00 PM »

The 2-way/4-way difference in Ohio is striking.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,461
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2016, 01:41:04 PM »

Awesome NC numbers, PA and FL are par for the course, OH is unfortunate. Looks like Clinton should go with the ACC route.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2016, 01:41:09 PM »

Seems in line with Clinton +3/4 nationally.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2016, 01:41:15 PM »

literally wat @ NC results.

Pennsylvania makes sense as does Florida.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,851


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2016, 01:41:23 PM »

Great results!!
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,172
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2016, 01:41:38 PM »

Looks about right.

NC is more of a tossup though.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2016, 01:41:57 PM »

Awesome NC numbers, PA and FL are par for the course, OH is unfortunate. Looks like Clinton should go with the ACC route.

OH is still quite close, no reason to re-adjust strategy, especially given division in ground games.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,532
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2016, 01:43:39 PM »

If you flipped Ohio and North Carolina then they would be perfectly believable results.
Logged
Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,708
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2016, 01:44:06 PM »

Clinton is not going to win NC. If Obama couldn't do it again in 2012, it's not happening.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2016, 01:44:25 PM »

Hard to imagine NC ending up to the left of OH and FL, but these numbers are fairly believable, overall.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2016, 01:44:56 PM »

If you flipped Ohio and North Carolina then they would be perfectly believable results.

Given the polling situation we've seen for Blacks and College Whites, these seem perfectly believable.
Logged
Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,708
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2016, 01:45:18 PM »

Will Johnson's numbers continue to remain high?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,461
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2016, 01:46:26 PM »

Awesome NC numbers, PA and FL are par for the course, OH is unfortunate. Looks like Clinton should go with the ACC route.

OH is still quite close, no reason to re-adjust strategy, especially given division in ground games.

Oh I totally agree, my statement was if you had to make a clear choice or an emphasis.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,777
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2016, 01:47:33 PM »

After the rough time Hillary's had over the past two weeks, these results still mean a very likely President Hillary because it can get a lot better for her and not much worse
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,368
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2016, 01:49:09 PM »

The 2-way/4-way difference in Ohio is striking.

It's all within the MOE, so not particularly.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,838
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2016, 01:50:57 PM »

Clinton is not going to win NC. If Obama couldn't do it again in 2012, it's not happening.

What does his narrow loss in 2012 have to do with this? You realize the current trends in North Carolina actually favor Democrats, right? By all measure, the NC electorate will actually be slightly more favorable to Democrats this year than in 2012, due to demographic changes alone.

Just curious what exactly your justification is for your position. North Carolina is becoming more competitive, not less, and Trump is clearly not a shoe-in for that state based on the polls we have been seeing.
Logged
Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,708
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2016, 02:00:13 PM »
« Edited: September 08, 2016, 02:08:05 PM by Spark498 »

Clinton is not going to win NC. If Obama couldn't do it again in 2012, it's not happening.

What does his narrow loss in 2012 have to do with this? You realize the current trends in North Carolina actually favor Democrats, right? By all measure, the NC electorate will actually be slightly more favorable to Democrats this year than in 2012, due to demographic changes alone.

Just curious what exactly your justification is for your position. North Carolina is becoming more competitive, not less, and Trump is clearly not a shoe-in for that state based on the polls we have been seeing.

I agree with those statements about changing demographics. My justification for my position is that Hillary Clinton is not Obama and will not drive turn out as effectively in AA communities (Raleigh, Charlotte). Trump will gain more support among blacks than Romney did, simply because there is not an AA present on the ticket. And also based on historical trends, before Obama in 2008, the last Democrat to win there was Carter. Clinton does not energize voters as much as Obama or Trump.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2016, 02:01:34 PM »

As long as Clinton can hold Pennsylvania in the east, she should be OK as long as North Carolina and Florida is iffy at best for Trump.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,508
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2016, 02:04:17 PM »

Dear god these results are garbage, NC will be to the right of Florida.
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 737
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 08, 2016, 02:04:25 PM »
« Edited: September 08, 2016, 02:10:15 PM by Mallow »

As long as Clinton can hold Pennsylvania in the east, she should be OK as long as North Carolina and Florida is iffy at best for Trump.

It's tough to imagine a realistic map in which Trump wins nationally, but loses PA (and VA). The only one I can think of involves the unlikely sweep of NC, IA, OH, FL, NV, and NH (with a bonus ME2 if a tie-breaker is necessary)
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2016, 02:05:00 PM »

Clinton is not going to win NC. If Obama couldn't do it again in 2012, it's not happening.

What does his narrow loss in 2012 have to do with this? You realize the current trends in North Carolina actually favor Democrats, right? By all measure, the NC electorate will actually be slightly more favorable to Democrats this year than in 2012, due to demographic changes alone.

Just curious what exactly your justification is for your position. North Carolina is becoming more competitive, not less, and Trump is clearly not a shoe-in for that state based on the polls we have been seeing.

I agree with those statements about changing demographics. My justification for my position is that Hillary Clinton is not Obama and will not drive turn out as effectively in AA communities (Raleigh, Charlotte). Trump will gain more support among blacks than Romney did, simply because there is not an AA present on the ticket.

A) No reason to assume African American turnout will drop all that much.
B) White college voters are shifting towards Clinton, Trump already maxed out here with Romneys numbers among non-college whites
C) Ground game, ground game, ground game
4) HB2 and the general state of the NC GOP.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2016, 02:05:56 PM »

Quite the education gap in North Carolina…

whites w/ college degree:
Trump 42%
Clinton 38%
Johnson 16%

whites without college degree:
Trump 62%
Clinton 18%
Johnson 16%

Also, Trump is in third place among non-whites in both NC and OH….

North Carolina non-whites:
Clinton 71%
Johnson 14%
Trump 10%

Ohio non-whites:
Clinton 62%
Johnson 10%
Stein 9%
Trump 9%
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2016, 02:07:21 PM »

These polls should destroy the entire "Johnson is a spoiler who will hand the election to Clinton" myth.  He is taking most of his support from #NeverTrump conservatives who would most likely vote for Hillary in a two-way race.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 12 queries.