Opinion of marxists.org

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Horrible Site because:

-It's full of unreadable dense nonsense based on the stuff Snowstalker linked from it and
-The ideology it's about is so insanely f[inks]ing stupid, and no one but edgy teenagers believes in it today.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Freedom site for being an archive to the writings of just about any prominent Marxist thinker, and, again, Snowstalker is a terrible representative for anything regardless of what you think about the ideology itself.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Freedom site for being an archive to the writings of just about any prominent Marxist thinker, and, again, Snowstalker is a terrible representative for anything regardless of what you think about the ideology itself.

But any "prominent Marxist thinker" promotes utter trash. Why should they be taken more seriously than Snowstalker. It's a horrible horrible ideology that has accomplished nothing good ever.

[Devout Centrist]

I put "freedom site" because, like Breitbart, it never fails to get me laughing.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Freedom site for being an archive to the writings of just about any prominent Marxist thinker, and, again, Snowstalker is a terrible representative for anything regardless of what you think about the ideology itself.

But any "prominent Marxist thinker" promotes utter trash. Why should they be taken more seriously than Snowstalker. It's a horrible horrible ideology that has accomplished nothing good ever.

As others here have said before, it's a great resource for people studying the ideology and even conservative academics cite it frequently in their writings.  Why should that be looked down on just because you disagree with the content?

[Associate Justice PiT]

Freedom site for being an archive to the writings of just about any prominent Marxist thinker, and, again, Snowstalker is a terrible representative for anything regardless of what you think about the ideology itself.

But any "prominent Marxist thinker" promotes utter trash. Why should they be taken more seriously than Snowstalker. It's a horrible horrible ideology that has accomplished nothing good ever.

     As far as Marxist thinkers go, I'm concerned about the sanity of someone reading any writers other than Marx himself.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Marxist = horrible

[SWE]

FS (not a complete moron)

[Antonio the Sixth]

FS (sane)

Seriously, what the f**k BRTD.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

FS (sane)

Seriously, what the f**k BRTD.

It's unreadable junk from an ideology only edgy teenagers take seriously.

[Pyro]

FS (not a complete moron)

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

Freedom site for being an archive to the writings of just about any prominent Marxist thinker, and, again, Snowstalker is a terrible representative for anything regardless of what you think about the ideology itself.

But any "prominent Marxist thinker" promotes utter trash. Why should they be taken more seriously than Snowstalker. It's a horrible horrible ideology that has accomplished nothing good ever.

The whole of social democracy is descended from Marxist thought.


Are you confusing Marxists.org with some crappy left rag like counterpunch?

[Murica!]

FS (sane)

Seriously, what the f**k BRTD.

It's unreadable junk from an ideology only edgy teenagers take seriously.

Just because you're to dense to read it doesn't mean that it's "unreadable trash."

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Freedom site for being an archive to the writings of just about any prominent Marxist thinker, and, again, Snowstalker is a terrible representative for anything regardless of what you think about the ideology itself.

But any "prominent Marxist thinker" promotes utter trash. Why should they be taken more seriously than Snowstalker. It's a horrible horrible ideology that has accomplished nothing good ever.

The whole of social democracy is descended from Marxist thought.


Are you confusing Marxists.org with some crappy left rag like counterpunch?

The issue is that he's familiar with marxists.org from the parts of it that Sagestalker liked.

[Filuwaúrdjan]

It's a very useful repository of texts, many of which are of significant historical interest.

[Cory]

FS (not a complete moron).

[Antonio the Sixth]

It's a very useful repository of texts, many of which are of significant historical interest.

I think one of the problems with BRTD might be that he doesn't really comprehend the notion of history. He seems kind of stuck in the present and projecting it on every event, person or idea from the past.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

BRTD makes me half-consider Marxism. FS.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

To give just one example, marxists.org has this document on early Soviet contraception and abortion policy (from Protection of Women and Children in Soviet Russia by Alice Withrow Field), which I've seen cited academically in both pro-choice and pro-life contexts and have myself used as research for a work of fiction.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Here's the thing: OK maybe Snowstalker wasn't the best advocate for Marxism. So was TNF a better and more representative one?

Well if so then Marxism is totally worthless because TNF made my blood chill. That is one scary, dangerous lunatic guy. At least Snowstalker can be written off as just a dumb teenager wanting to be an edgelord.

So yeah, I can't see any value in Marxism.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

As a right-winger, I have a natural kinship with an ideology based on strength of arms and contingent on the breakdown of society incurred by a group we might both call "liberals".

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Here's the thing: OK maybe Snowstalker wasn't the best advocate for Marxism. So was TNF a better and more representative one?

Well if so then Marxism is totally worthless because TNF made my blood chill. That is one scary, dangerous lunatic guy. At least Snowstalker can be written off as just a dumb teenager wanting to be an edgelord.

So yeah, I can't see any value in Marxism.

Here's a better question: why do you use Atlas posters to decide whether an ideology is right or not?

[SWE]

Here's the thing: OK maybe Snowstalker wasn't the best advocate for Marxism. So was TNF a better and more representative one?

No. TNF just wanted Sweden with death squads.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Here's the thing: OK maybe Snowstalker wasn't the best advocate for Marxism. So was TNF a better and more representative one?

Well if so then Marxism is totally worthless because TNF made my blood chill. That is one scary, dangerous lunatic guy. At least Snowstalker can be written off as just a dumb teenager wanting to be an edgelord.

So yeah, I can't see any value in Marxism.

Here's a better question: why do you use Atlas posters to decide whether an ideology is right or not?

It's more with judging it based on its advocates and the arguments people make for it and where besides Atlas do you find actual communists today

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Here's the thing: OK maybe Snowstalker wasn't the best advocate for Marxism. So was TNF a better and more representative one?

Well if so then Marxism is totally worthless because TNF made my blood chill. That is one scary, dangerous lunatic guy. At least Snowstalker can be written off as just a dumb teenager wanting to be an edgelord.

So yeah, I can't see any value in Marxism.

You're really not seeing the point. The thread you made is 'Opinion of marxists.org', not 'Opinion of Marxism'.