The absentee/early vote thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 08:01:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  The absentee/early vote thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 86
Author Topic: The absentee/early vote thread  (Read 170982 times)
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #325 on: October 12, 2016, 12:00:08 PM »

https://twitter.com/electionsmith/status/786240169338777600
Cool stat, regarding recently registered voters, specifically ones in the last week of registration.

Florida: Of the 151k voters  registered Oct1-Oct9, 2012, 68.5% voted in Nov 6 election.
Of the state's 12.5m reg voters, 68.3% voted .
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #326 on: October 12, 2016, 01:10:13 PM »

https://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/786258607616561152
This doesn't seem good for Clinton.

Statewide, OH absentee ballot requests are down 2.6% from 2012.

In Democratic strongholds:
Cuyahoga -16.1%
Franklin -16.3%
Hamilton -3.1%
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #327 on: October 12, 2016, 01:18:49 PM »

https://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/786258607616561152
This doesn't seem good for Clinton.

Statewide, OH absentee ballot requests are down 2.6% from 2012.

In Democratic strongholds:
Cuyahoga -16.1%
Franklin -16.3%
Hamilton -3.1%

As one of the tweet commenters noted, this could be due to lack of interest from Republican moderates who are concentrated in Dem strongholds...
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #328 on: October 12, 2016, 01:43:21 PM »

https://twitter.com/_TargetSmart/status/786273435278127104

Party affiliation of early voters (estimated for Virginia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia). Comparisons can't really be made to 2012 yet, since in person early voting dominates in Georgia, North Carolina.



Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,297
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #329 on: October 12, 2016, 01:48:45 PM »

https://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/786258607616561152
This doesn't seem good for Clinton.

Statewide, OH absentee ballot requests are down 2.6% from 2012.

In Democratic strongholds:
Cuyahoga -16.1%
Franklin -16.3%
Hamilton -3.1%

As one of the tweet commenters noted, this could be due to lack of interest from Republican moderates who are concentrated in Dem strongholds...

It's not just moderates, Republican enthusiasm is just about non-existent in Franklin County atm.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #330 on: October 12, 2016, 01:53:59 PM »

https://twitter.com/_TargetSmart/status/786273435278127104

Party affiliation of early voters (estimated for Virginia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia). Comparisons can't really be made to 2012 yet, since in person early voting dominates in Georgia, North Carolina.





Looking good in IA, WI, VA and MI.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #331 on: October 12, 2016, 02:05:25 PM »

since hillary never really needed OH but would take it anway .....liberals can take this relaxed.

florida and NC are muuuuch more important.
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #332 on: October 12, 2016, 02:31:57 PM »

https://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/786258607616561152
This doesn't seem good for Clinton.

Statewide, OH absentee ballot requests are down 2.6% from 2012.

In Democratic strongholds:
Cuyahoga -16.1%
Franklin -16.3%
Hamilton -3.1%

As one of the tweet commenters noted, this could be due to lack of interest from Republican moderates who are concentrated in Dem strongholds...

It's not just moderates, Republican enthusiasm is just about non-existent in Franklin County atm.

If moderate Republicans are the reason, shouldn't Hamilton see a bigger drop-off than 3%? At the same time, I can't deduce at this point whether this is the first bad sign for Hillary in OH. Absentee is dominated by Republicans in most states.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,297
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #333 on: October 12, 2016, 02:39:45 PM »

https://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/786258607616561152
This doesn't seem good for Clinton.

Statewide, OH absentee ballot requests are down 2.6% from 2012.

In Democratic strongholds:
Cuyahoga -16.1%
Franklin -16.3%
Hamilton -3.1%

As one of the tweet commenters noted, this could be due to lack of interest from Republican moderates who are concentrated in Dem strongholds...

It's not just moderates, Republican enthusiasm is just about non-existent in Franklin County atm.

If moderate Republicans are the reason, shouldn't Hamilton see a bigger drop-off than 3%? At the same time, I can't deduce at this point whether this is the first bad sign for Hillary in OH. Absentee is dominated by Republicans in most states.

I'm not just talking about moderates, it's Republicans in general (also the Cincinnati suburbs are home to some pretty right-wing Republicans, very different from what you'd find in Franklin County).  Also, I was just talking about Franklin County.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,795
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #334 on: October 12, 2016, 03:46:25 PM »

Kyle Kondik mentioned on twitter that Clinton should make pretty substantial gains at Columbus' suburbs. These people are Kasich Republicans.
Logged
Southern Delegate matthew27
matthew27
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #335 on: October 12, 2016, 03:48:43 PM »

   Total number of ballots cast in all reporting jurisdictions:   568,678
Logged
Southern Delegate matthew27
matthew27
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #336 on: October 12, 2016, 05:23:53 PM »
« Edited: October 12, 2016, 05:28:58 PM by matthew27 »

The spreadsheet updated

As of 10/12

  Total number of ballots cast in all reporting jurisdictions:  592,936

http://www.electproject.org/early_2016

101,634 have voted in Florida
117,754 have voted in Iowa
49,647 have voted in Michigan
67,079 have voted in Virginia
Logged
Southern Delegate matthew27
matthew27
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #337 on: October 12, 2016, 07:37:08 PM »
« Edited: October 13, 2016, 01:02:46 AM by matthew27 »

                       Total number of ballots cast in all reporting jurisdictions:   654,239


Update: 658,202
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #338 on: October 13, 2016, 09:58:27 AM »

https://www.wired.com/2016/10/hashtag-can-tell-us-early-voting-ohio/

I hate unscientific data much as anyone but here it is.


"But it’s hard to ignore the surprising enthusiasm gap between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the hashtag #OHVotesEarly, which started trending on Twitter this morning as early voting kicked off in Ohio. Throughout the election cycle, Clinton supporters have often been out-shouted by Trump’s and Bernie Sanders’ more vocal voter bases. Today, however, the Ohio hashtag was brimming with photos of voters who had already cast votes for Hillary Clinton. Meanwhile, many of the tweets that included references to Trump were about how the hashtag is—you guessed it—rigged.

But according to Twitter’s data, the enthusiasm gap is real. The social media site tells WIRED that of the tweets sent using the hashtag #OHVotesEarly over the last 24 hours, 75 percent included mentions of Clinton, while just 25 mentioned Trump. “It’s an inexact science,” says Twitter spokesman Nick Pacilio, but it’s a staggering disparity, nonetheless.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,316
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #339 on: October 13, 2016, 10:23:19 AM »

https://www.wired.com/2016/10/hashtag-can-tell-us-early-voting-ohio/

I hate unscientific data much as anyone but here it is.


"But it’s hard to ignore the surprising enthusiasm gap between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the hashtag #OHVotesEarly, which started trending on Twitter this morning as early voting kicked off in Ohio. Throughout the election cycle, Clinton supporters have often been out-shouted by Trump’s and Bernie Sanders’ more vocal voter bases. Today, however, the Ohio hashtag was brimming with photos of voters who had already cast votes for Hillary Clinton. Meanwhile, many of the tweets that included references to Trump were about how the hashtag is—you guessed it—rigged.

But according to Twitter’s data, the enthusiasm gap is real. The social media site tells WIRED that of the tweets sent using the hashtag #OHVotesEarly over the last 24 hours, 75 percent included mentions of Clinton, while just 25 mentioned Trump. “It’s an inexact science,” says Twitter spokesman Nick Pacilio, but it’s a staggering disparity, nonetheless.

it's particularly inaccurate as hashtag anything skews heavily towards younger voters. how many people over 55 have a twitter account? over 65?
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #340 on: October 13, 2016, 10:34:10 AM »

https://www.wired.com/2016/10/hashtag-can-tell-us-early-voting-ohio/

I hate unscientific data much as anyone but here it is.


"But it’s hard to ignore the surprising enthusiasm gap between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the hashtag #OHVotesEarly, which started trending on Twitter this morning as early voting kicked off in Ohio. Throughout the election cycle, Clinton supporters have often been out-shouted by Trump’s and Bernie Sanders’ more vocal voter bases. Today, however, the Ohio hashtag was brimming with photos of voters who had already cast votes for Hillary Clinton. Meanwhile, many of the tweets that included references to Trump were about how the hashtag is—you guessed it—rigged.

But according to Twitter’s data, the enthusiasm gap is real. The social media site tells WIRED that of the tweets sent using the hashtag #OHVotesEarly over the last 24 hours, 75 percent included mentions of Clinton, while just 25 mentioned Trump. “It’s an inexact science,” says Twitter spokesman Nick Pacilio, but it’s a staggering disparity, nonetheless.

it's particularly inaccurate as hashtag anything skews heavily towards younger voters. how many people over 55 have a twitter account? over 65?

I agree that it's really skewed but it's hard to gauge the magnitude of it because Twitter doesn't collect age as far as I know. Early voting is dominated by Democrats in most states so while it likely isn't 75-25 in favor of Hillary, it's reasonable to believe she's definitely received much higher than Trump.
Logged
alomas
Rookie
**
Posts: 237
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #341 on: October 13, 2016, 11:23:40 AM »

Good numbers from Trump in FL and NC, which have already been strongest Republican swing-states in 2012. He must win those states. I don't care about Virginia and Wisconsin, Clinton can carry them by double-digits (that looks realistic) if only Trump will edge the ones he needs.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #342 on: October 13, 2016, 11:25:02 AM »

Good numbers from Trump in FL and NC, which have already been strongest Republican swing-states in 2012. He must win those states. I don't care about Virginia and Wisconsin, Clinton can carry them by double-digits (that looks realistic) if only Trump will edge the ones he needs.

He's actually underperforming Romney and McCain in both of these states so these are not good numbers for him.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #343 on: October 13, 2016, 11:42:43 AM »

Good numbers from Trump in FL and NC, which have already been strongest Republican swing-states in 2012. He must win those states. I don't care about Virginia and Wisconsin, Clinton can carry them by double-digits (that looks realistic) if only Trump will edge the ones he needs.

Yeah, he's embarrassingly underperforming Romney in both of these states. As of 10/7 he was probably underperforming Romney by 23 points in North Carolina and Clinton has almost caught up to Trump in vote by my requests in Florida. Obama was never close before in person voting started in either state.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,621
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #344 on: October 13, 2016, 12:35:27 PM »

Too bad the rest of Wisconsin doesn't have early voting like the city of Milwaukee. They started on September 24. I have off this week, would have love to have voted early. Have to wait until October 24th and rush after I get off work since they close a half hour after.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #345 on: October 13, 2016, 12:37:19 PM »

Too bad the rest of Wisconsin doesn't have early voting like the city of Milwaukee. They started on September 24. I have off this week, would have love to have voted early. Have to wait until October 24th and rush after I get off work since they close a half hour after.

It was up to the local clerk in each municipality, I think. It's pretty much opened 100% right now in Dane County.
Logged
Southern Delegate matthew27
matthew27
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #346 on: October 13, 2016, 12:49:41 PM »
« Edited: October 13, 2016, 12:56:10 PM by matthew27 »

As of early 10/13

  Total number of ballots cast in all reporting jurisdictions:  756,027


NC as of 10/13. Republican turn out is WAY DOWN!



Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #347 on: October 13, 2016, 12:58:57 PM »

Woof. Those numbers are brutal. Surely this would be a disaster downballot if it continues?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #348 on: October 13, 2016, 01:00:28 PM »

Republicans only take the lead only 1 week before in-person early-voting starts, ouch!
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #349 on: October 13, 2016, 01:02:05 PM »

Guys, please stop the hype !

Only 0.6% of the vote is in so far.

And only 140K people have even requested ballots in NC, out of an expected vote of 4.5 million.

Even if Dems do a little better now with these few requested ballots, Trump could absolutely crush Hillary among election day voters ...

This is so meaningless right now.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 86  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 14 queries.