|
|
SirMuxALot
Jr. Member
Posts: 368
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2016, 04:59:10 PM » |
|
you guys brought out your armchair doctors to say she had mental illness, brain diseases, cancer, altzeheimers, ect. The fact that she finally had something doesn't mean you guys were right.
Oh, stop that. No one of any significance said anything about mental illness, brain diseases, cancer, alzheimers. I never heard any of that. We had supposedly down-the-middle reporters at WaPo NYT, etc shaming Rs for even so much as asking if this might deserve at least as much coverage as McCain's health in '08. And that deserves at least a mild apology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SirMuxALot
Jr. Member
Posts: 368
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2016, 11:31:28 PM » |
|
Trump supporters would just blame Obama somehow.
I applaud you for some World Class Projection there. Is there any reason why Trump couldn't just blame Bush? Would it be wrong to do so?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SirMuxALot
Jr. Member
Posts: 368
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 12, 2016, 12:59:47 PM » |
|
Do you expect a campaign/administration to go out in public every time the candidate has a fit of indigestion?
It's so unfortunate to see so many people saying things they don't actually believe. I don't actually believe you think pneumonia is on par with indigestion.
|
|
|
|
SirMuxALot
Jr. Member
Posts: 368
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 12, 2016, 01:03:27 PM » |
|
Non-terminal ailments don't really need to be disclosed.
I see, pneumonia isn't terminal until you die. Makes sense. Neither is pancreatic cancer by that standard.
|
|
|
|
|
SirMuxALot
Jr. Member
Posts: 368
|
|
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2016, 01:10:32 PM » |
|
These people don't actually believe Hillary is "terminally ill", it's all concern trolling.
Actually, as several of us have stated over and over, it's not even that. The concern is her instinct to mislead. It's a sincere concern on our part. I know you all think the "well she has to lie, because Republicans" is legitimate, but I'm not sure that will pass with any significant number of voters.
|
|
|
|
|
SirMuxALot
Jr. Member
Posts: 368
|
|
« Reply #18 on: September 12, 2016, 01:43:30 PM » |
|
Should catching the flu be required to be disclosed to the world everytime ?
Yes, why not? For gosh sakes, what in the world would be so bad about the campaign issuing a press release. Very simply stating, "such and such candidate has the flu and will be easing their campaign schedule for the next few days...we look forward to resuming later in the week...blah blah". It's not a big deal. Honestly, what in the world is so awful about truthfulness here? I just can't understand this mentality of excusing so much secrecy around one of the three most public figures in the world at this point in time.
|
|
|
|
SirMuxALot
Jr. Member
Posts: 368
|
|
« Reply #19 on: September 12, 2016, 03:09:03 PM » |
|
doesn't mean there should be a legal requirement to do so.
Strawman. No one ever said there should be legislation or executive orders to such effect. 2. More important, she has been truthful about the pneumonia, so what exactly are you complaining about?
In my opinion, if there was no video of the van incident, there would have been no "truthful" admission yesterday. I know you disagree with that. That's fine. But there are a lot of other failures to be truthful in the past that strongly backs up my opinion.
|
|
|
|