Which upset would surprise you least?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 05:28:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Which upset would surprise you least?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: See title (with 538 odds in parentheses)
#1
Alaska (19.3%)
 
#2
New Mexico (18.0%)
 
#3
Minnesota (17.6%)
 
#4
Maine (17.2%)
 
#5
Rhode Island (16.0%)
 
#6
South Dakota (15.0%)
 
#7
Montana (14.3%)
 
#8
Delaware (13.6%)
 
#9
Texas (12.6%)
 
#10
New Jersey (11.4%)
 
#11
Kansas (11.3%)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 117

Author Topic: Which upset would surprise you least?  (Read 1419 times)
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 11, 2016, 04:27:42 PM »
« edited: September 11, 2016, 04:37:36 PM by mencken »

South Carolina - 18.5% and Missouri - 18.4% were excluded for being more intuitively obvious choices.

Also, for your amusement:
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,288
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2016, 04:31:03 PM »

Alaska since it was closer than most of these other states and is trending Democratic. It will also be interesting to see what Johnson's numbers in this state are and how they may affect the result.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2016, 04:35:37 PM »

Alaska.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2016, 04:43:40 PM »

Alaska since it was closer than most of these other states and is trending Democratic. It will also be interesting to see what Johnson's numbers in this state are and how they may affect the result.
Logged
Orthogonian Society Treasurer
CommanderClash
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,561
Bermuda


Political Matrix
E: 0.32, S: 4.78

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2016, 05:54:15 PM »

Maine, Minnesota, Alaska.
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2016, 06:52:27 PM »

South Dakota because it has a fetish for making maps look bad
Logged
elcorazon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,402


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2016, 08:45:57 AM »

1. Minnesota
2. Montana
3. Alaska
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2016, 06:51:00 PM »

Montana or Alaska going to Clinton
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2016, 06:52:43 PM »

1. Alaska
2. Minnesota
3. Maine
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2016, 07:37:08 PM »

Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,725


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 12, 2016, 07:57:34 PM »

Minnesota (which is way more of a swing state than Atlas wants to admit), followed by Maine at-large.
Logged
Senator-elect Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,726
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 12, 2016, 07:58:31 PM »

Alaska, Minnesota, Maine
Logged
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2016, 08:30:40 AM »

Bump:

Nate Silver now considers Maine the obvious favorite:
Maine 28.1%
Minnesota 22.2%
New Mexico 21.5%
Rhode Island 17.6%

Montana 17.4%
Alaska 16.1%

Delaware 15.4%
New Jersey 13.3%

South Dakota 12.1%
Kansas 8.8%
Texas 8.3%
Logged
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,695
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2016, 09:00:02 AM »

Maine, easily.
Logged
Plankton5165
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 684


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 24, 2016, 09:05:14 AM »

New Mexico only voted for a loser in 1976 and 2000, and I'm pretty sure Trump will be the winner of the election.

Minnesota, Rhode Island, Delaware, and New Jersey wouldn't surprise me either.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,888
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2016, 09:06:50 AM »

Trump winning New Jersey.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,529
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2016, 09:30:51 AM »

Minnesota (which is way more of a swing state than Atlas wants to admit), followed by Maine at-large.

No it isn't...
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2016, 09:34:20 AM »

Bump:

Nate Silver now considers Maine the obvious favorite:
Maine 28.1%
Minnesota 22.2%
New Mexico 21.5%
Rhode Island 17.6%

Montana 17.4%
Alaska 16.1%

Delaware 15.4%
New Jersey 13.3%

South Dakota 12.1%
Kansas 8.8%
Texas 8.3%


that's what weighing Emerson and Google Consumer Surveys highly will do.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2016, 09:35:25 AM »

New Mexico only voted for a loser in 1976 and 2000, and I'm pretty sure Trump will be the winner of the election.

Minnesota, Rhode Island, Delaware, and New Jersey wouldn't surprise me either.
Your trolling isn't very good.
Logged
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2016, 11:56:26 AM »

Trump winning Maine outright
Trump winning Wisconsin
Hillary winning Arizona
Hillary winning Georgia


The other scenarios just aren't plausible. Minnesota has not gone GOP since 1972, and it is not a good state for Trump due to college educated whites in the twin cities and the northern part of the state being extremely liberal. Now, McCain and Romney did better in MN than in MI, but I can't think of a scenario where Trump wins it.

Same with Hillary and Alaska. Johnson will do well here, but he's not going to take enough away from Trump to hand it over to Hillary.

New Mexico is 47% latino. ZERO chance Trump wins it.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2016, 11:58:27 AM »

1. Trump winning Maine
2. Clinton winning Texas
3. Clinton winning Alaska
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,309
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2016, 12:24:11 PM »

Maine and Alaska are the only remote possibilities
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,746


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2016, 01:50:47 PM »

Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2016, 01:51:38 PM »

I cant believe people are choosing alaska...the atlas obsession with a "blue" alaska is getting old. Also, Alaska has a 16.5% chance not a 19% chance according to 538
Logged
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 09, 2016, 10:50:29 PM »

Looks like Minnesota was the closest.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 15 queries.