Annexation of Canada
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 03:53:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Annexation of Canada
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Poll
Question: Do you approve of the idea of Atlasia annexing Canada?
#1
Strongly Approve
 
#2
Approve
 
#3
Disapprove
 
#4
Strongly Disapprove
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Annexation of Canada  (Read 6483 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 28, 2005, 04:22:08 AM »

Vote and discuss as liked.
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2005, 04:28:15 AM »

Would it ever happen in real life? Absolutely not.

What comes after this? Mexico and Western Europe?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2005, 06:15:33 AM »

Only if we're talking about the real Canada.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2005, 06:35:48 AM »

Option 4.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2005, 08:40:56 AM »

#4
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,568
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2005, 08:50:42 AM »

Option 1 -but only in Atlas Fantasy. 
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2005, 09:05:18 AM »

BOOO!!!!

*picks up a red juicy tomato*

Oh, Canada!
The land that we adore!
True patriot love
In all thy hearts command!
With glowing hearts
We see thee rise
The true north strong and free!

don't know the rest of it but oh well...

SPLATGH!!
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2005, 09:17:29 AM »

Option 1-wouldn't mind both ways though! Smiley
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2005, 09:31:34 AM »

option 1!
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2005, 10:58:43 AM »

We could use another region, as the ones we have no are so overcrowded...
Oh, wait.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2005, 11:54:36 AM »

Yeah, I'm with Bono and Peter on this.  It would never happen in real life, which would make it unrealistic and set a questionable precedent.  And we're ridiculously undercrowded anyway, so adding more states/regions will hardly help things.

Option 4.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2005, 12:15:39 PM »

Only if we're talking about the real Canada.

Hahaha, what is your obsession with "La Haute-Canada" and I would assume "Le Bas-Canada" ?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2005, 12:32:13 PM »

Only if we're talking about the real Canada.

Hahaha, what is your obsession with "La Haute-Canada" and I would assume "Le Bas-Canada" ?
Le Haut-Canada, s'il te plait.
Pas d'obsession, j'aime le nom, c'est tout. Et je n'aime pas (dammit, what's "the flag" in French?)
The British colony of Canada was split into two, Upper Canada and Lower Canada, or Haut-Canada and Bas-Canada, in IIRC the 1820s, and reunited some 20 years after. Upon confederation in 1867, it was once again split along the same border as before, but the two parts were now named Quebec and Ontario instead.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2005, 12:41:19 PM »

Oppose.  We already have enough Canadiens as it is.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 28, 2005, 12:44:27 PM »

Only if we're talking about the real Canada.

Hahaha, what is your obsession with "La Haute-Canada" and I would assume "Le Bas-Canada" ?
Le Haut-Canada, s'il te plait.
Pas d'obsession, j'aime le nom, c'est tout. Et je n'aime pas (dammit, what's "the flag" in French?)
The British colony of Canada was split into two, Upper Canada and Lower Canada, or Haut-Canada and Bas-Canada, in IIRC the 1820s, and reunited some 20 years after. Upon confederation in 1867, it was once again split along the same border as before, but the two parts were now named Quebec and Ontario instead.

I dont need a Canadian history lesson, I AM Canadian after all Tongue
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2005, 12:56:09 PM »

Yeah, I'm with Bono and Peter on this.  It would never happen in real life, which would make it unrealistic and set a questionable precedent.  And we're ridiculously undercrowded anyway, so adding more states/regions will hardly help things.

Option 4.
IRV would never happen in real life either, so yall's logic does not follow.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2005, 01:02:08 PM »

But the severe undercrowding is okay though?


Quick Grammar Nazism point here.  Doesn't "y'all" apply only to a group of people, and not just one?  I know it's an odd question considering it's not actually a word, but I just thought I'd ask.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 28, 2005, 01:06:21 PM »

But the severe undercrowding is okay though?


Quick Grammar Nazism point here.  Doesn't "y'all" apply only to a group of people, and not just one?  I know it's an odd question considering it's not actually a word, but I just thought I'd ask.

By "y'all", he obviously means the forum elite conspiracy.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 28, 2005, 01:08:27 PM »

That joke is really getting tired now.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 28, 2005, 01:39:30 PM »

But the severe undercrowding is okay though?


Quick Grammar Nazism point here.  Doesn't "y'all" apply only to a group of people, and not just one?  I know it's an odd question considering it's not actually a word, but I just thought I'd ask.

By "y'all", he obviously means the forum elite conspiracy.
I meant you (Joe), Bono, and Peter, the two people you said in your post that follow your same logic. 
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 28, 2005, 01:50:18 PM »

Ah ha, now it makes sense!  I'm gradually getting to grips with the ongoing Southern murder of the English language.  Wink
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 28, 2005, 01:52:51 PM »

Well everyone should know where I stand on this based on the Puerto Rican Statehood Act and the Pacifican Statehood Act (which has yet to reach the Senate floor). Smiley
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 28, 2005, 02:16:00 PM »

Ah ha, now it makes sense!  I'm gradually getting to grips with the ongoing Southern murder of the English language.  Wink
You mean improving.
Seriously, "yall" is an improvement on the English language.  It provides a separate word for the 2nd-person plural pronoun than the 2nd-person singular pronoun.

For example, in this sentence:
"What do you want?"
It cannot be determined whether the speaker is talking to a group or an individual.
But if "you" is used for singular and "yall" for plural, than it can be assumed that the speaker is talking to a single person, or else he would've said "What do yall want?"
There.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 28, 2005, 02:23:35 PM »

Just Ontario and British Columbia as the rest can go to hell. Wink
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 28, 2005, 03:01:55 PM »

Just Ontario and British Columbia as the rest can go to hell. Wink

It already is. Cheesy
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 13 queries.