If Clinton loses, is she the national version of Martha Coakley? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 10:14:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  If Clinton loses, is she the national version of Martha Coakley? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Clinton loses, is she the national version of Martha Coakley?  (Read 711 times)
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,723
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« on: September 14, 2016, 10:49:26 PM »

No, Coakley's didn't campaign for all and took winning for granted in both of her losing campaigns. She also alienated a large contingent of her own party in her 2014 campaign for governor. I not sure what she did to do that, though.

She didn't necessarily alienate her own party in 2014 (the closeness of her primary was likely due to her past record of losing to Scott Brown), it's just that for governor's races, Massachusetts is a swing state. Even though the legislative majorities are so big that a Republican Governor's veto is basically meaningless, the voters still like having it there for some reason.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.