Don't vote for Johnson because ISIS is Nader's fault

[dead0man]

link NewJersey.com, whatever the hell that is.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's pretty good, I like this one too

You must be logged in to read this quote.

He can't think of any other reason the guy running as a Libertarian would be pro-pot?  That's like saying an 1846 Democrat from S.Carolina was pro-slavery just to get the white vote.

He then goes on to explain, like most pro-Hillary people do, how bad Trump is.  No selling of Hillary at all, just fearmongering (rightly no doubt) about Trump.  People that don't plan on voting for her or Trump are not going to change their mind because we were reminded again how sh**tty Trump is.  We don't care.  We think Clinton is just as bad or at least nearly as bad that it makes no stinking difference.  To paraphrase something I read recently..it's the GOP's fault Trump was nominated, it will be the Dems fault if he wins.  How the hell did we even get here?  This is Donald Trump we're talking about.  Hasn't he always been a joke?  Like since the early 80s?  Why...what?  It makes no freaking sense.

Both parties should be embarrassed by this entire fiasco, and they both will be in time.  The GOP before the Dems I predict.

[dead0man]

I love the arguments that third party supporters (in swing states) put forth to defend their completely indefensible positions.

Right, like anti-war Dems voting for Hillary.  Wait, no, they don't defend their positions at all do they?

[dead0man]

(hey look, somebody defended Hillary by attacking Trump...weird!)

No it's not.  There are several other options, at least two of them are much more anit-war than Hillary.  If you are anti-war, and you vote for Hillary, you're an asshole.  (unless you're only anti-war when it's a Pubby in charge, then you're a super asshole)  Were there anti-war Dems in the Primary?  If yes, why didn't they win the nomination...if no, what the hell is wrong with your party?