Should birds be considered dinosaurs?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 08:31:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Should birds be considered dinosaurs?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should birds be considered dinosaurs?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 37

Author Topic: Should birds be considered dinosaurs?  (Read 1082 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,070
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 15, 2016, 10:57:59 PM »

Most paleontologists today actually seem to think so. This means of course that dinosaurs DID in fact co-exist with humans, and still do today.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2016, 07:03:09 AM »

yes (not anti-science)
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,660
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2016, 12:59:22 PM »

No, just because they evolved from dinosaurs in the ancient past doesn't mean that they're dinosaurs now. Just like humans aren't considered Apes.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,763
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2016, 01:44:24 PM »

Humans are primates and the mutation in the junior chimp causes dwarfism as per Darwin.

Birds are warm blooded reptiles that lay eggs.

Crocks, Gators and Birds are dinosaurs
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,063
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2016, 03:29:37 PM »

No, just because they evolved from dinosaurs in the ancient past doesn't mean that they're dinosaurs now. Just like humans aren't considered Apes.
But humans ARE considered Apes (along with bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans).
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2016, 03:32:22 PM »

No.  Just like Lucy Lost Her Grip wasn't a human.  Birds devoloped alongside dinosaurs and continued evolving as the dinosaurs died.

Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2016, 03:43:42 PM »

No, just because they evolved from dinosaurs in the ancient past doesn't mean that they're dinosaurs now. Just like humans aren't considered Apes.
But humans ARE considered Apes (along with bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans).

Good point.  But then we should call birds saurischian like we already do, since birds are only descended from that branch of the dinosaurs.  In the way humans are primates.

So ill change my mind.  They are dinosaurs...but only after being saurischian birds, but before being called reptiles.  Nobody wants to really call this a reptilian dinosaur:
 
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,689
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2016, 03:48:42 PM »

No, just because they evolved from dinosaurs in the ancient past doesn't mean that they're dinosaurs now. Just like humans aren't considered Apes.
But humans ARE considered Apes (along with bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans).

Calling people "apes" is generally frowned upon outside of certain subcultures.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,063
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2016, 03:51:43 PM »

No, just because they evolved from dinosaurs in the ancient past doesn't mean that they're dinosaurs now. Just like humans aren't considered Apes.
But humans ARE considered Apes (along with bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans).

Calling people "apes" is generally frowned upon outside of certain subcultures.
It's the scientific categorization.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2016, 06:45:08 AM »
« Edited: September 17, 2016, 07:03:24 AM by muon2 »

Dinosaurs can be used two ways in scientific descriptions. The most precise use would be to describe all creatures that share the same common ancestor as Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus (specifically their last common ancestor). That use includes birds. It does not include crocodiles or the more distant reptiles such as lizards and snakes.

Because birds are still extant and have a historical definition that predates dinosaurs, the term dinosaur is sometimes used to describe all creatures with the same common ancestor as Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus except birds. This can make for a clearer description to a lay reader, but it doesn't describe a scientific grouping in biology, ie a clade.

Since birds share a common ancestor with all other dinosaurs, and that ancestor is not an ancestor of other reptiles, birds should be considered dinosaurs in the scientific sense.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,271
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2016, 08:39:23 AM »

Yes, they are Avian Dinosaurs. If one wants to describe dinosaurs without including our feathered friends, they should use the term "non-avian dinosaur"

There are two major divisons of dinosaurs, the bird-hipped clade (Ornithischians) and the lizard-hipped clade (Saurischea). in retrospect the names are bad, because Birds are more closely related to the latter group than the supposedly Bird hipped bunch. The Saurischea are further divided into Sauropodomorpha (stuff like Diplodocus and other long necked dinosaurs) and Therapods. This last group splits further into a few classes until we get to the Birds. In fact, one of the birds closest relatives is, of all things, the Tyranosaur group.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,763
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2016, 09:18:11 AM »

Sharks, Gators, Crocks and Birds who evolved from Tyradactol are dinosar
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,271
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2016, 09:32:02 AM »

Actually Crocodiles and Alligators, although the closest living relative of dinosaurs (including birds) are not actually dinosaurs. They belong to a clade called Archnosaur, which includes the dinosaurs and the pterosaurs.

Sharks are not dinosaurs but cartiliginous fish. They branch off at a far earlier point.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,070
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2016, 10:05:58 AM »

Sharks were actually around BEFORE dinosaurs.
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2016, 11:12:14 PM »

So there were bird-hipped dinosaurs, and there were lizard-hipped dinosaurs.  Birds as we know them descended from... lizard-hipped dinosaurs. 
To me, they are not.  They are similar.  Especially birds like roadrunners.  But alligators and crocodiles are even closer.
Logged
Panda Express
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,578


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2016, 11:26:24 PM »

Sharks, Gators, Crocks and Birds who evolved from Tyradactol are dinosar

Tyradactol = Safe dinosar
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 22, 2016, 12:21:22 AM »

No, just because they evolved from dinosaurs in the ancient past doesn't mean that they're dinosaurs now. Just like humans aren't considered Apes monkeys.
right
Logged
Senator-elect Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,714
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2016, 07:45:29 PM »

Of course.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2016, 06:22:17 PM »

No, just because they evolved from dinosaurs in the ancient past doesn't mean that they're dinosaurs now. Just like humans aren't considered Apes.
This.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.229 seconds with 14 queries.