Washington Post: Trump used $258,000 from his charity to settle legal problems

[Dr. Arch]

I do not hear protests from the Trumpista crowd about laws being violated. I mean, at least, deny it!

They know their candidate is in deep guano.

[ag]

I do not hear protests from the Trumpista crowd about laws being violated. I mean, at least, deny it!

They know their candidate is in deep guano.

Only since today?

[dspNY]

I do not hear protests from the Trumpista crowd about laws being violated. I mean, at least, deny it!

They know their candidate is in deep guano.

Only since today?

It's going to lead to a constant drumbeat about Trump's taxes and the "spending other people's money" comment didn't help either...that soundbite is going to end up in a Clinton ad in no time flat

[Maxwell]

the party of Reagan folks.

Going from "There's no such thing as a free lunch" to "There's nothing like doing things with other people's money". Just terrific party of principles guys.

[ag]

Still silence. Not a word from "Lincoln Republican" in this thread, for instance.

[Maxwell]

Still silence. Not a word from "Lincoln Republican" in this thread, for instance.

this song came into my head immediately when you said

[Fargobison]

Hardly shocking, Donnie's foundation like most things Donnie touches is nothing but a complete scam setup to benefit him.

Nobody with a blue avatar should be saying anything about HRC's foundation if they are supporting the orange con man.

[ag]

So, I notice that Lincoln Republican has been around here long enough to comment on my long memory. But, it seems, not long enough to comment on this.

[MK]

 Typical drive-by from the MSM people are probably use to it by now.   

[Dr. Arch]

Typical drive-by from the MSM people are probably use to it by now.   

Mind addressing the actual issue of his illegal activities? What are your thoughts? Do you agree with what he's done? What's to say he doesn't plan to continue this at an international level through a potential presidency?

[MK]

Typical drive-by from the MSM people are probably use to it by now.   

Mind addressing the actual issue of his illegal activities? What are your thoughts? Do you agree with what he's done? What's to say he doesn't plan to continue this at an international level through a potential presidency?

Nothing to address here especially when I read articles headlining "may have". Its a typical desperation hit piece.  I fully expect more of these between now and Nov if it looks like Trump is closing in or winning.  If these activates were so "illegal" then why hasn't NY prosecutors issued charges before the 2016 election?   Oh of course... Mr Trump wasn't leading in the polls against Hillary Clinton I take it? 

[Hermit For Peace]

Cool!

Go Trump!

Savvy business man.

So non PC....that's what counts.

Trump is the man!


This type of thought is what I envision is going through the minds of his followers.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Typical drive-by from the MSM people are probably use to it by now.   

Mind addressing the actual issue of his illegal activities? What are your thoughts? Do you agree with what he's done? What's to say he doesn't plan to continue this at an international level through a potential presidency?

Nothing to address here especially when I read articles headlining "may have". Its a typical desperation hit piece.  I fully expect more of these between now and Nov if it looks like Trump is closing in or winning.  If these activates were so "illegal" then why hasn't NY prosecutors issued charges before the 2016 election?   Oh of course... Mr Trump wasn't leading in the polls against Hillary Clinton I take it? 

a) because it's complicated, NY AG said it was an investigation on issues recently raised, not like the Trump one in Hawaii, a real one.
b) unless someone is convicted responsible journalists cannot say someone has absolutely done something illegal
c) so you won't comment about the allegations because something, something Clinton?

[MK]

Typical drive-by from the MSM people are probably use to it by now.   

Mind addressing the actual issue of his illegal activities? What are your thoughts? Do you agree with what he's done? What's to say he doesn't plan to continue this at an international level through a potential presidency?

Nothing to address here especially when I read articles headlining "may have". Its a typical desperation hit piece.  I fully expect more of these between now and Nov if it looks like Trump is closing in or winning.  If these activates were so "illegal" then why hasn't NY prosecutors issued charges before the 2016 election?   Oh of course... Mr Trump wasn't leading in the polls against Hillary Clinton I take it? 

a) because it's complicated, NY AG said it was an investigation on issues recently raised, not like the Trump one in Hawaii, a real one.
b) unless someone is convicted responsible journalists cannot say someone has absolutely done something illegal
c) so you won't comment about the allegations because something, something Clinton?

Keep digging.  Grandma needs all the help she can get.   

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Typical drive-by from the MSM people are probably use to it by now.   

Mind addressing the actual issue of his illegal activities? What are your thoughts? Do you agree with what he's done? What's to say he doesn't plan to continue this at an international level through a potential presidency?

Nothing to address here especially when I read articles headlining "may have". Its a typical desperation hit piece.  I fully expect more of these between now and Nov if it looks like Trump is closing in or winning.  If these activates were so "illegal" then why hasn't NY prosecutors issued charges before the 2016 election?   Oh of course... Mr Trump wasn't leading in the polls against Hillary Clinton I take it? 

a) because it's complicated, NY AG said it was an investigation on issues recently raised, not like the Trump one in Hawaii, a real one.
b) unless someone is convicted responsible journalists cannot say someone has absolutely done something illegal
c) so you won't comment about the allegations because something, something Clinton?

Keep digging.  Grandma needs all the help she can get.   

Considering (actually) Corruptzo the Clown's current trajectory... I'm not sure it's Hillary who'll need the shovel.

[Joe Republic]

Deplorably? must just be researching his talking points for us before he starts posting in this thread.  I'm sure it must be taking a while for this particular case.

But at least MK skipped that stage and gave it his 'best' shot anyway.

[Dr. Arch]

Deplorably? must just be researching his talking points for us before he starts posting in this thread.  I'm sure it must be taking a while for this particular case.

But at least MK skipped that stage and gave it his 'best' shot anyway.

LOL. I lost it for a second there. Nice.

[MK]

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-email-it-guy-caught-asked-destroy-evidence/


The MSM is completely in the bag for Hillary.  Ignores anything negative to her yet any Trump dirt they are all over it like hot cakes.

[Lachi]

Watch as Mike Pence completely deflects the question and makes it about the Clinton Foundation...
https://youtu.be/mVYTvhTePRA

[ag]

Watch as Mike Pence completely deflects the question and makes it about the Clinton Foundation...
https://youtu.be/mVYTvhTePRA

At least, he answered something. I am still waiting for our Lincoln Republican to say so much as "Benghazi".

[Antonio the Sixth]

So when is he going to be indicted?

[ag]

So when is he going to be indicted?

Alas, I am afraid, only after the War.

[DS0816]

I'm surprised it's only $258,000?

Most of the pay-to-play dollars in connection to Hillary Clinton were at least double.

This isn't "pay-to-play," this is stealing from your charity.

You support pay-to-play?

[DS0816]

Ebowed,

I don't like saying this about people but anyone that could support Donald Trump is deplorable. They need to take a look at their sorry lives as something is seriously messed up with their humanity.

Anyone who supports Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic Party, after the DNC—with then-DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz—rigged their primaries to screw over Bernie Sanders (and the millions of individuals who voted the nomination to Bernie Sanders), is supportive of that corruption. And this make such a person deplorable because such a person who supports this is also corrupt.

[Virginiá]

Anyone who supports Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic Party, after the DNC—with then-DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz—rigged their primaries to screw over Bernie Sanders (and the millions of individuals who voted the nomination to Bernie Sanders), is supportive of that corruption. And this make such a person deplorable because such a person who supports this is also corrupt.

Define 'rigged.' DNC staffers expressing their opinions in emails and musing about schemes does not constitute 'rigging.' It's not a good thing, but you shouldn't be so loose with the labels. You cheapen the phrase when you apply it so liberally.