Which third party candidates do you believe should be included in the debates? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:39:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Which third party candidates do you believe should be included in the debates? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which third party candidates do you believe should be included in the debates?
#1
Gary Johnson (Libertarian)
 
#2
Jill Stein (Green)
 
#3
Darrell Castle (Constitution)
 
#4
Others
 
#5
None - Should be Clinton vs Trump
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which third party candidates do you believe should be included in the debates?  (Read 601 times)
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« on: September 22, 2016, 06:26:56 PM »

I'm quite interested to see what the opinion on here is about whether any third party candidates should be included in the debates, regardless of the Commission on Presidential Debates decision to only allow candidates polling above 15% to take part.

Gary Johnson has ballot access to all 538 electoral votes, Jill Stein has acess to 480 (522 with write-in) electoral votes and Darrell Castle has ballot access to 207 (334 with write-ins) electoral votes. As you need 270 to win, all of these candidates could, theoretically, obtain enough electoral votes to win the Presidency.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 15 queries.