waltermitty/bullmoose vs. mark warner/ evan bayh
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 09:35:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  waltermitty/bullmoose vs. mark warner/ evan bayh
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: waltermitty/bullmoose vs. mark warner/ evan bayh  (Read 925 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 29, 2005, 09:59:33 PM »

discuss.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2005, 10:41:07 PM »

Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,037
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2005, 10:49:24 PM »

Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Ohio are all populist states, so you're screwed there. Plus the fact you have that man in your signature is another very massive blow to you in Ohio.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2005, 12:01:41 AM »

Yes, I think that just the mention of the fact that he likes Bob Taft is enough to kill him in Ohio.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2005, 08:09:59 AM »

i dont hink pennsylvania is a populist state.  bob casey will find that out next year.

bullmoose and i would do very well in the philly suburbs, well enough to squeak out a victory.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2005, 09:31:00 AM »

i dont hink pennsylvania is a populist state.  bob casey will find that out next year.

bullmoose and i would do very well in the philly suburbs, well enough to squeak out a victory.

PA would be a 50-50 tossup.  You would win the Philly suburbs, BUT outisde of there is a populist state.  I would volunteer to do a county map in that case.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2005, 09:55:40 AM »

Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2005, 11:29:44 AM »

i dont hink pennsylvania is a populist state.  bob casey will find that out next year.

bullmoose and i would do very well in the philly suburbs, well enough to squeak out a victory.

What people fail to realize about PA is that a liberal Republican would not win here or atleast have a difficult time winning. Sure you guys would take the suburbs but the rest of the state would be strong for Warner.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2005, 11:40:52 AM »

I wouldn't vote for you and neither would Wisconsin. I'd vote for Warner so my vote wouldn't be wasted on a third party candidate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.