No Fortune 100 CEOs Back Republican Donald Trump

[Bismarck]

Dems in 2012: Romney is bad for being the candidate of the rich
Dems in 2016: Trump is bad for not being the candidate of the rich.

[Bismarck]

Dems in 2012: Romney is bad for being the candidate of the rich
Dems in 2016: Trump is bad for not being the candidate of the rich.

Cute strawman, but no, we think Trump is bad for... other reasons.

I just mean in regards to this thread. If a bunch of fortune 100 CEOs came out tomorrow and endorsed Trump there would be a thread about how he was in the pocket of big money.

[Bismarck]

The Republicans aren't the working class party and that won't change with this election.  Whites love to overlook that many members of the working class are actually minorities.  Go figure!

Hate to break it to you dude, but the working class vote has been voting Republican for quite awhile now.

Uh, hate to break it to you, bud, but whites earning less than $50k per year are more Democratic than whites earning more than $50k per year. McCain won the former group by just 4; the latter group by 13. If you want to brag about the GOP winning working-class whites by a few percentage points as if it's some sort of mandate, then I guess you can do so...but the notion that they've been some reliably GOP voting bloc outside of the South for ages is ridiculous.

The only reason whites as a whole aren't a swing voting bloc is because of bourgeoisie cookie-cutter suburbanites.

Glad to see this post. So many people on this forum seem to have the idea that wealthy suburban whites are democrats.