Obama vetoes 9/11 bill
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:00:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Obama vetoes 9/11 bill
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Obama vetoes 9/11 bill  (Read 4162 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: September 30, 2016, 04:31:19 AM »

okay, as far as i can tell this covers virtually every Congressman who voted to sustain the veto:

- is a public member of the House Freedom Caucus
- is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus
- is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus
- is a member of the House Intelligence Committee
That's weird that the "Freedom Caucus" voted with both the "Progressive" and "Black" Caucuses.
Logged
Angel of Death
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,411
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: September 30, 2016, 07:10:45 PM »

No words.

And you people seriously take these clowns at their word that they will allow a President Clinton to fill the SCOTUS vacancy?
Logged
Lyin' Steve
SteveMcQueen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: September 30, 2016, 11:39:59 PM »

There's such a strange dynamic going on here. It seems like opposition to this bill is unanimous: Obama, the CIA, the New York Times, a bunch of former US national security experts, the Kuwaiti government, and many others have all put out statements in opposition to JASTA. Yet in spite of this wall of opposition, the entire Senate remains completely united in passing it. What's going on here?


Also here is Cornyn's argument for passing JASTA and it's pretty convincing.

Yeah, I'm largely convinced by Cornyn. Obama goofed here.

Cornyn conflates this bill with FSIA, which holds foreign nations responsible for their diplomatically-immune citizens on U.S. soil.  Suing Saudi Arabia because one of its diplomats stole a purse is entirely different from suing Saudi Arabia because you suspect that someone in the Saudi government was connected to terrorism on American soil and therefore the whole government is responsible.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: October 02, 2016, 12:05:05 AM »

There's such a strange dynamic going on here. It seems like opposition to this bill is unanimous: Obama, the CIA, the New York Times, a bunch of former US national security experts, the Kuwaiti government, and many others have all put out statements in opposition to JASTA. Yet in spite of this wall of opposition, the entire Senate remains completely united in passing it. What's going on here?


Also here is Cornyn's argument for passing JASTA and it's pretty convincing.

Yeah, I'm largely convinced by Cornyn. Obama goofed here.

Cornyn conflates this bill with FSIA, which holds foreign nations responsible for their diplomatically-immune citizens on U.S. soil.  Suing Saudi Arabia because one of its diplomats stole a purse is entirely different from suing Saudi Arabia because you suspect that someone in the Saudi government was connected to terrorism on American soil and therefore the whole government is responsible.

hmmmm. Maybe you're right. i'm uncharacteristicall7 wishy-washy
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.