Clinton was never going to be the candidate of millennials, who she lost 20-80 in the primaries.
She managed to hold better among 18-24 y.o.s than 25-29 y.o.s, and hold Trump to Romney levels among both groups; seems to put to rest the post-2012 chatter about the "youngest millennials" turning conservative.
Well she was "the candidate of millennials" compared to Trump.
And yeah, I'm excited that I belong to the least deplorable mini-generation. I suspect that part of that is due to demographic shifts.