1956 Without Ike
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 09:14:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1956 Without Ike
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1956 Without Ike  (Read 990 times)
BL53931
Rookie
**
Posts: 186


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 28, 2016, 06:33:57 PM »

Not many remember this but Eisenhower came close to not running in 1956 following his heart attack. If he doesn't who runs and who gets nominated?

My guess would be Stevenson and Nixon. Any ideas? Who wins?
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2016, 06:51:04 PM »
« Edited: September 28, 2016, 09:57:10 PM by Representative Kingpoleon »


283: Adlai Stevenson II/Stuart Symington - 50.8%
248: Richard Nixon/Thomas Dewey - 47.3%
Others - 1.9%

Adlai Stevenson II starts out down quite a bit. Despite overwhelming support of the Western and upper Southern Democratic parties, Truman's coalition of 1948 is not fully unified until Symington, a strong Truman ally, is tapped for the bottom of the ticket. Symington's strong foreign policy experience and time in the house make him an effective ally. Despite Dewey's persistent campaigning, Nixon sometimes seems outshined by his experienced and somewhat more popular running mate.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2016, 08:21:02 PM »



Estes Kefauver (D-TN)/Ernest McFarland (D-AZ)
Bill Knowland (R-CA)/Henry Cabot Lodge Jr (R-MA)
Harry F. Byrd (I-VA)/Orval Faubus (I-AR)
Logged
TheElectoralBoobyPrize
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,527


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2016, 10:10:19 AM »

I say Nixon (or whoever the GOP nominee is) wins because a) the country was doing well and b) there was no "fatigue" factor or anything since the GOP had only been in for one term...remember how uncommon it is to kick a party out after just one term.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,777


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2017, 02:49:22 AM »

The country was firmly Democratic in the 1950s. Eisenhower won because he was Eisenhower not because he was a Republican. I think Stevenson would have beaten anyone other than Eisenhower fairly easily, so had Eisenhower not ran for reelection he would have been succeeded in the White House by Adlai Stevenson.
Logged
BL53931
Rookie
**
Posts: 186


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2017, 03:18:00 PM »
« Edited: February 25, 2017, 03:19:48 PM by BL53931 »

I agree that almost any Democrat would have won if Ike had not run.

Stevenson was regarded by many on the Right as a sort of squishy Liberal but I think he would have been centrist. Interesting to speculate on the course we would have taken under him. I doubt he would have been proactive on Civil Rights- neither was JFK but circumstances forced him to lead. Adlai would have done that too, maybe a lot earlier than 1961 or so.  

In real life Stevenson died at age 65; if re-elected in 1960 he may not have lived out that term.
Logged
dercook
Rookie
**
Posts: 29


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2017, 06:58:51 AM »

Not sure about the Republicans, but Stevenson probably would've run anyway since the Democrats had to get someone nominated regardless of whether Ike was there.
Logged
dercook
Rookie
**
Posts: 29


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 07, 2017, 07:02:54 AM »

Perhaps Harold Stassen would be nominated. He had been an active candidate for years, facing challenges especially from Dewey and Ike, and without the latter he could've got on top more easily.
Logged
MeanBeanMachine
Rookie
**
Posts: 33
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 07, 2017, 07:10:13 AM »

Nixon would've won a closer election, but would Democrats have nominated Stevenson without Ike running again.  From my understanding both parties were very supportive of Eisenhower.  It may have been too early for Kennedy to run for Democrats. I would've much preferred the era where both parties worked together.  Actually I could've seen myself as a Democrat until the 60's.
Logged
GoTfan
GoTfan21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,688
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2017, 07:19:48 AM »

Nixon would've won a closer election, but would Democrats have nominated Stevenson without Ike running again.  From my understanding both parties were very supportive of Eisenhower.  It may have been too early for Kennedy to run for Democrats. I would've much preferred the era where both parties worked together.  Actually I could've seen myself as a Democrat until the 60's.

Maybe Humphrey or Johnson?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.