2016 Republican primaries : who would have won in a 40-year old primary?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:39:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  2016 Republican primaries : who would have won in a 40-year old primary?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: 2016 Republican primaries : who would have won in a 40-year old primary?
#1
Marco Rubio		  
#2
Ted Cruz		  
#3
Scott Walker		  
#4
Bobby Jindal		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: 2016 Republican primaries : who would have won in a 40-year old primary?  (Read 908 times)
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 02, 2017, 09:39:30 AM »
If the 2016 Republican presidential primaries included only quadragenerian candidates, who would have won the nomination : Marco Rubio (45), Ted Cruz (46), Scott Walker (49) or Bobby Jindal (45)?
Logged
JustinTimeCuber
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,323
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2017, 10:29:45 AM »
I think lyin' Ted would have edged out little Marco.
Logged
(Still) muted by Kalwejt until March 31
Eharding
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,934


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2017, 01:14:09 PM »
Quote from: JustinTimeCuber on February 02, 2017, 10:29:45 AM
I think lyin' Ted would have edged out little Marco.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,734
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2017, 02:17:49 PM »
Crazy to think they're the same age as the performers of this song.
Logged
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2017, 11:40:03 PM »
Going with Rubio... sorry, guys.

Walker could also have had a chance. Cruz would never have appealed to enough Reoublicans to put together a winning coalition.
Logged
(Still) muted by Kalwejt until March 31
Eharding
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,934


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2017, 11:41:52 PM »
Quote from: whitesox130 on February 04, 2017, 11:40:03 PM
Going with Rubio... sorry, guys.

Walker could also have had a chance. Cruz would never have appealed to enough Reoublicans to put together a winning coalition.

-That's what they said about Trump.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,730


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2017, 12:02:02 AM »
Whoever was best able to unify all of the party.  I will say Scott Walker, but they are all excellent conservative options, and hopefully a couple of them will be president some day.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,734
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2017, 01:07:09 AM »
So far the results are 9, 11, 2, 0

So close to conspiracy-able...
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2017, 11:57:54 AM »
Cruz, but none of these are particularly good candidates.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.234 seconds with 15 queries.