DEM's only: Would you be sad if ...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:56:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  DEM's only: Would you be sad if ...		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
Yes.
#2
No, because she'll have won the election.
#3
No, because it would be the first time since 1860 that four different candidates win states.
#4
No, because I hate her.
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Author Topic: DEM's only: Would you be sad if ...  (Read 429 times)
On Fleek
on fleek
Rookie
**
Posts: 105
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 21, 2016, 11:41:51 PM »
... Evan McMullin wins Utah and Gary Johnson wins Alaska, with Hillary being the runner-up in both states?
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2016, 11:44:44 PM »
Two and three, of course.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2016, 12:57:28 AM »
Yes, libertarianism winning, with the cancer ideology that it is, would make me very sad.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,196
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2016, 01:01:43 AM »
Quote from: Intell on October 22, 2016, 12:57:28 AM
Yes, libertarianism winning, with the cancer ideology that it is, would make me very sad.

This.

Also, Utah Dems deserve to have something to look forward to.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,527
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2016, 08:57:50 AM »
Logged
President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️
Peebs
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,034
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2016, 01:00:32 PM »
Voted three.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,166
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2016, 01:50:11 PM »
Options 2 and 3 - but 2 more so.
Logged
Lyin' Steve
SteveMcQueen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2016, 01:25:40 AM »
I don't mind McMullin winning Utah.
Johnson needs to be eradicated from the history books, though, and if he wins a state that unfortunately won't happen.
Also don't want anything to legitimize the Libertarian Party.  They've been masquerading as "small-government Republicans", "the weed legalization party", and "everything you believe, if only we weren't shut out by the two major parties."  In actuality, their ideology is utterly ludicrous and the core of their party is a joke.
Logged
Murica!
whyshouldigiveyoumyname?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,295
Angola


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2016, 06:37:53 PM »
Quote from: Intell on October 22, 2016, 12:57:28 AM
Yes, libertarianism winning, with the cancer ideology that it is, would make me very sad.
I'm very confused,  which libertarians?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2016, 06:42:40 AM »
I wouldn't care.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.237 seconds with 14 queries.