Religious People - Where do you stand on the creationist/evolutionist scale? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:59:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Religious People - Where do you stand on the creationist/evolutionist scale? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Just pick the answer you are closest to
#1
Young Earth Creationist - The world was created by a/some god(s), sometime in the last 10,000 years, in a short amount of time. Evolution is heresy.
#2
Old Earth Creationist - Scientists are roughly correct about the age of the earth, but evolution did not happen. A/some god(s) created each species at certain times in history from dust or similar.
#3
Progressive Creationist - Scientists are roughly correct about the age of the earth, and species did develop from previous species, but no actual evolution is present. A/some god(s) created new species out of parts of previous species without natural sele
#4
Theistic Evolutionist - Scientists are roughly correct about the age of the earth, and natural selection did happen to a point. However, A/some god(s) guided the process throughout with a clear end goal in mind and did some of the "evolution" on
#5
Darwinian Evolutionist - The theory of evolution is fully correct and valid. This does not prohibit a god from existing according to my beliefs.
#6
Do not believe in any gods
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Religious People - Where do you stand on the creationist/evolutionist scale?  (Read 3982 times)
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,959
United States


« on: October 21, 2016, 11:25:09 AM »
« edited: October 21, 2016, 11:27:14 AM by Cruz 2020 »

Young Earth. Though am open to the day-age view.

6-12 thousand years at the most.

... What? There are enormous, even vast amounts of scientific proof to completely discredit any notion of a young earth. Have you never taken a course in Anthropology or Biology?

     The funny part is that he is evidently married to a geologist.

But true. She is old  🌏. Astronomy tends to favor young earth however.

Huh?  Even young-Earth creationist astronomers like Jason Lisle acknowledge that the distant starlight problem poses a significant difficulty for a young universe model.  

Anyway, for me, I'm definitely a fan of the gap theory (often called the gap principle) - as there is too much scientific evidence contradicting a young Earth, and the exegesis makes sense with it.
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,959
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2016, 12:01:49 AM »

Young Earth. Though am open to the day-age view.

6-12 thousand years at the most.

... What? There are enormous, even vast amounts of scientific proof to completely discredit any notion of a young earth. Have you never taken a course in Anthropology or Biology?

     The funny part is that he is evidently married to a geologist.

But true. She is old  🌏. Astronomy tends to favor young earth however.

Huh?  Even young-Earth creationist astronomers like Jason Lisle acknowledge that the distant starlight problem poses a significant difficulty for a young universe model.  

Anyway, for me, I'm definitely a fan of the gap theory (often called the gap principle) - as there is too much scientific evidence contradicting a young Earth, and the exegesis makes sense with it.

Is that the one where God creates, destroys, and re-creates everything, and fossils are from the first creation?

Yes, I think that the "Earth was without form and void" refers to the time on the Earth over geological eons.  During this time at some point also occurred the rebellion of 1/3 of the angels led by Satan.  Then God remade the Earth "anew" (and I believe that creation referred to a mass extinction event, though I can't be totally sure) and life was breathed into Adam.  I believe that humans were created in the special image of God, but this was done in the body of an evolved ape-like ancestor, based on DNA similarity.   The exact cosmological details are known by God, but I generally accept the scientific consensus with regard to these questions, with the exception of the fact that I hold to a rather strict view of monogenism. 
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,959
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2016, 04:09:49 PM »

If you're going to insist on your own intellectual superiority you might want to learn how to write in a manner that doesn't come across as borderline illiterate Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 15 queries.