The Klartext Landfill for Absurd, Ignorant, and Deplorable Posts VI

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

I honestly think if Hillary really needs to be punished, being a two-time loser of races she was suppoused to win easily is hurting enough.

She just lost in an upset to Donald F-king Trump. She certainly feels awful now.

I felt empathy for every Presidential loser in my adult lifetime, except for Poppy Bush and Hillary Clinton.

I suppose the sense of entitlement both of them suffer from is repulsive to me.

The Jen Palmieris and Robby Mooks of the world just make me dislike Hillary more.

Well at least we can agree that Robby Mook is pond scum

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

I think the sassy chip in the Jerrybot is malfunctioning. Better call Apple.

Or it's finals week and I really don't have time for racists like you or douchbags like Cathcon.

Not familiar with traditional spelling, but I believe it's "douchebag".

In all honesty, sounds like stress is getting the best of you.

Yeah his posts sound like my mother at the peak of her alcoholism right before she'd start screaming and slapping me in the Publix checkout line.

You really have had a sh**t life haven't you.  is that why you have to troll.  To get the attention that you always needed as a child?

Why would I want that? That sounds like too much attention if you ask me. It's actually rather embarrassing. As is your meltdown.

What meltdown.  Calling out the Nazi and asking someone who is a douchebag frat boy to stop correcting me is a meltdown?  You need to check your definition is that is so.

Are you okay?

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

I think the sassy chip in the Jerrybot is malfunctioning. Better call Apple.

Or it's finals week and I really don't have time for racists like you or douchbags like Cathcon.

Not familiar with traditional spelling, but I believe it's "douchebag".

In all honesty, sounds like stress is getting the best of you.

Yeah his posts sound like my mother at the peak of her alcoholism right before she'd start screaming and slapping me in the Publix checkout line.

You really have had a sh**t life haven't you.  is that why you have to troll.  To get the attention that you always needed as a child?

Why would I want that? That sounds like too much attention if you ask me. It's actually rather embarrassing. As is your meltdown.

What meltdown.  Calling out the Nazi and asking someone who is a douchebag frat boy to stop correcting me is a meltdown?  You need to check your definition is that is so.

Are you okay?

Yeah.  Why?  I know I shouldn't respond to Sanchez but the dude it an unabashed racist.  I don't take kindly to people like that, why I call him out on all his sh**t.  And Cathcon is just a douche, which is something I also don't like.

I agree that Sanchez is awful, but I'm not sure what your beef is with Cathcon, but regardless, you seem to be getting way too worked up about this.  It's just an obscure internet forum.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Ok, can we just shut this thread down? all that seems to happen is people getting insulted and bullied for no reason now.

How about creating a new gallary?

EDIT: I think I might start working on that.

The umm.... Santander Dumpster of Bad Posts?

The Famous Mortimer Repository of Racism, Rape Apologism, and Ridiculous Posts?

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Was Jerry always this aggro?

This is what I find funny about this forum.  Everyone keeps thinking I'm aggressive, yet all I do is make posts and just say what I see occurring with different people on the forum.  I'm very perplexed why people keep up with this.  I've seen no change in my demeanor, nor has anyone I personally come into contact with.  
Alas, some things will elude me, since no one wants to try and explain what changed with me and just keep trying to pile on.

No offense, but have you ever heard the saying "If you meet one a**hole, you met an a**hole.  If you meet twenty a**holes, you're the a**hole?"  What I mean by that is if everyone keeps telling you you're being too aggressive, condescending, etc in a way that makes people actively not want to side with you even when they technically agree with your "side" of the argument, chances are your posts really have gotten more aggressive, condescending, and generally nasty in a way that makes them kind of grating to even read.  I'd suggest maybe just trying to tone down the intensity a few notches when replying to a post that upsets you.  

And with folks like Sanchez, think of it this way, why let him drag you down to his level?  What do you gain from engaging in a public pissing match with him?  It's not you're going to change his mind and most folks here already realize he's made a schtick out of acting like a whiny and rather immature bigot ever since the election.  You don't need to scream at him (or folks like him) through the keyboard to make other people realize that.  I think most folks, even a number of those who don't mind him and/or think his positives as a poster outweigh the negatives, are already well aware of this.  The only thing that happens if you let him get under your skin is you waste time yelling at a brick wall and get a reputation for being easily triggered.  

Another possibility might be to put him and maybe a few other posters who really drive you up the wall on ignore and simply never click show (or better yet, only click show when he or the other posters are posting in threads about things they generally offer interesting insights about, ex: FL politics).  I'm not saying this is something I would necessarily do, but in your case, it might not be the worst idea to give it a try.  I get that some folks don't put people on ignore as a matter of principle and don't know how you feel about that, but it's definitely another option.  

Was Jerry always this aggro?

This is what I find funny about this forum.  Everyone keeps thinking I'm aggressive, yet all I do is make posts and just say what I see occurring with different people on the forum.  I'm very perplexed why people keep up with this.  I've seen no change in my demeanor, nor has anyone I personally come into contact with. 
Alas, some things will elude me, since no one wants to try and explain what changed with me and just keep trying to pile on.

Maybe stop calling people you're arguing with "Honey." It comes off as condescending.

That's how I talk.  Nothing is meant with it, it is just something I say.

Fair enough, but now that you know it comes off as incredibly condescending to many people, it'd probably make sense to try not to call people on the forum you're arguing with "honey."  It's one thing when you don't realize how it comes across, but now you do.  It's obviously your call about whether or not you wanna keep calling people that when posting, but if you do, don't be surprised if people react accordingly.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Was Jerry always this aggro?

This is what I find funny about this forum.  Everyone keeps thinking I'm aggressive, yet all I do is make posts and just say what I see occurring with different people on the forum.  I'm very perplexed why people keep up with this.  I've seen no change in my demeanor, nor has anyone I personally come into contact with.  
Alas, some things will elude me, since no one wants to try and explain what changed with me and just keep trying to pile on.

No offense, but have you ever heard the saying "If you meet one a**hole, you met an a**hole.  If you meet twenty a**holes, you're the a**hole?"  What I mean by that is if everyone keeps telling you you're being too aggressive, condescending, etc in a way that makes people actively not want to side with you even when they technically agree with your "side" of the argument, chances are your posts really have gotten more aggressive, condescending, and generally nasty in a way that makes them kind of grating to even read.  I'd suggest maybe just trying to tone down the intensity a few notches when replying to a post that upsets you.  

And with folks like Sanchez, think of it this way, why let him drag you down to his level?  What do you gain from engaging in a public pissing match with him?  It's not you're going to change his mind and most folks here already realize he's made a schtick out of acting like a whiny and rather immature bigot ever since the election (probably a mix of genuine beliefs and trolling).  You don't need to scream at him (or folks like him) through the keyboard to make other people realize that.  I think most folks, even a number of those who don't mind him and/or think his positives as a poster outweigh the negatives, are already well aware of this.  The only thing that happens if you let him get under your skin is you waste time yelling at a brick wall and get a reputation for being easily triggered.  

Another possibility might be to put him and maybe a few other posters who really drive you up the wall on ignore and simply never click show (or better yet, only click show when he or the other posters are posting in threads about things they generally offer interesting insights about, ex: FL politics).  I'm not saying this is something I would necessarily do, but in your case, it might not be the worst idea to give it a try.  I get that some folks don't put people on ignore as a matter of principle and don't know how you feel about that, but it's definitely another option.  

On the first point, I don't see how the posts seem aggressive.  Like I keep saying, I'm just responding, nothing more.  If people think the way I post is aggressive, I can't fix that.

The other points, if you look at my posting history, I haven't responded to those people for a while.  

I was just using that as an example, but if you haven't been responding to them then great.  I'll let you know the next time I see a specific example of the aggressiveness, but until then all I can say is that it's something to try to keep in mind when arguing with people on the forum.  That said, a piece of this is also that you kind of got that reputation and while it'll go away soon enough, some of this is also just letting people get bored and move on to the next thing.

Re: Not being a punching bag: I won't pretend to know what RL has or hasn't been like for you.  Here's what I will say: the great thing about this forum is that it's pretty easy to ignore folks.  IRL, you can't just mute someone, but you can do that here.  Why waste your time on some a**hole on the internet who you'll never have to interact with unless you choose to?  It's not like someone's sifting through atlas posts keeping score in every argument (or if there is, then I pity that poor, wretched soul ).

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

I mean, I'd vote for Lynch, but this is a pretty awful post:

Well, apart from the forever-single feminists with ten cats in their urban studio apartment demographic, who else would support that SJW nutjob?

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

If Trump wants to do this, I say let him. It might be the sort of thing that could backfire enough for Republicans to support impeaching him.

And if Hillary had won and had purged the FBI leadership because she was unhappy with their actions during the election would that have merited impeachment? Or would that have been different?

Impeachment doesn't happen because of a specific wrongdoing. Nixon's involvement in the Watergate cover up was far from the worst thing that recent Presidents have done. Nixon was forced to resign because powerful interests in both parties wanted him replaced as President and found (or manufactured) the pretext for doing so.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Context (bolded the part that makes this a terrible post):

Nothing will happen, His supporters are too deluded.

The men will only look up to him more for his tremendous womanizing skills. Plus, he's so rich that he can soak Obama hotel beds in urine and pay off the help the next day!

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Mitt Romney was wrong then and is wrong now. Putin is among the most moral current leaders of any present Great Power.

Is this real?

EHarding is probably another Russian troll like what's-his-name.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Its time for our treason charges in this country.

Sadly, the only treason charges we are likely to see from the GOP-controlled Amerika are for daring to publicly disagree with Dear Leader Pussygrabber.

I know some of the more immature liberal wannabe EdgeLords or whatever see Trump's election as a their golden ticket, but come on.  If you're gonna make a dumb post that doesn't contribute anything, at least try to be a little more creative than "Dear Leader Pussygrabber."  I mean people called Trump "President Pussygrabber," what?  Ten billion times...in the first day or two after it came out.  And it wasn't clever or even particularly funny then either.  I'm not saying there aren't plenty of good ways to insult and mock Trump about the fact that he is a sex predator, but calling him "President/Dear Leader/whatever Pussygrabber" isn't one of them.  It's stale and uncreative at best; your post doesn't even work on it's own awful wannabe EdgeLord terms.  Sad.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

This is what the abortion debate seems like:

-A man is murdering people, and has been doing so for decades.
-Nine people are in a room, and are about to take a vote on whether or not to call the police about this man.
-Four people want to immediately call the police.
-Three people don't actually think that the man is guilty, so they see no point in calling the cops.
-One person says that, "While I personally believe he shouldn't be killing people, I shouldn't force my morality on others."
-Another person says "We all agree that killing people isn't ideal, but his victims are mostly poor people.  And I don't see any of you volunteering to pay for his future victims medical bills.  That means that you don't really care about the lives of his victims."

So they voted 5-4 to not call the police.  The 5 were convinced that they had a moral high ground and attacked the 4, claiming that calling the cops on the murderer would mean the establishment of a theocracy.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

This is what the abortion debate seems like:

-A man is murdering people, and has been doing so for decades.
-Nine people are in a room, and are about to take a vote on whether or not to call the police about this man.
-Four people want to immediately call the police.
-Three people don't actually think that the man is guilty, so they see no point in calling the cops.
-One person says that, "While I personally believe he shouldn't be killing people, I shouldn't force my morality on others."
-Another person says "We all agree that killing people isn't ideal, but his victims are mostly poor people.  And I don't see any of you volunteering to pay for his future victims medical bills.  That means that you don't really care about the lives of his victims."

So they voted 5-4 to not call the police.  The 5 were convinced that they had a moral high ground and attacked the 4, claiming that calling the cops on the murderer would mean the establishment of a theocracy.

That post belongs in the good post gallery.

No, it really doesn't.  It's a dumb straw-man masquerading as a clever post.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Liarwatha beats Schilling 59-39
Tom "The GOAT" Brady beats Fauxcahontas 53-45

You Republicans are trying way too hard with the bigoted nicknames.

Can't be bigoted. She's not a Native American buddy

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

The knives are out.

Nacht der langen Messer?!

Very impressive.  We usually get in at least one page before Godwin kicks in, even in threads about Republicans.

Pussygrabber Godwin'd his whole administration himself weeks ago.

Besides, Godwin's Law doesn't apply to discussion of actual Nazis.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Does it have to be named after someone?  Just a thought.

Yeah, we could just not name it after anyone.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Eharding should be reinstated, and Kal should have no authority to ban. He literally called for an eharding ban before anything questionable and then did it, and then muted him the second he came back. Kal has been gunning for Harding. Reinstate Harding and have any other moderator handle his ban/muting.
Clear bias by a single moderator against a poster is silly.

I don't even like Harding but a single moderators vendetta against him has been out right ridiculous.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

wonder if blocking Estrada because of his race was worth it for chucky?

With all due respect, if you think nuking the judicial filibuster had anything to do with Estrada, you're crazy.

What a great day for the unborn! 

Let's hope there will be another retirement/vacancy or two, so we can make more forward progress.

It has always amused me how so many Republicans think their party leadership actually wants to see abortion banned.  Weakening decisions like Roe vs. Wade and Planned Parenthood vs. Casey?  Sure.  However, they're just using you guys [pro-lifers].  They'd never actually ban abortion because of the huge political backlash that would occur across the country (especially in wealthy suburbs and exurbs and yes, that includes the arch-conservative ones).  Even without Kennedy or without Ginsberg, if there was a real chance of the Supreme Court doing a complete 180 on abortion, Roberts would switch.  This fight was decided a long time ago. 

You're right that Roberts (and Gorsuch) can't be fully trusted to actually overturn Roe, but to pretend the republican party doesn't want to ban abortion is silly. Remember the attempts to pass Personhood? Remember that OH would have a heartbeat ban, if it didn't have to be vetoed for the sake of strategy? (no sense starting a roe challenge until there's a chance to win at SCOTUS) I know you guys tell yourself lies about republicans so you don't have to think about your abortion not being there for you, but that doesn't change the fact that republicans want to make abortion illegal.

Oh, abortion will always be an option for people.  Technology is a beautiful thing.

I know this would be politically unpopular, but, once abortion is illegal, I would support a travel ban to any locations where elective abortion is legal to stop any Americans from being aborted and put pressure on those governments to ban it too.

lmao

(People like you are why I favor abortion rights, fwiw)

come on now it's perfectly understandable that the product of a failed abortion would have some pretty radical views on the matter

The bolded part is a pretty disgusting post on quite a few levels, but at least it has been deleted.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

hahahaha, I'm f-cking deceased:

Oh, Haslam!  The fact that we have a budget surplus doesn't mean that we have to spend it all today!  If the government (federal and state) would get rid of every last bit of the social safety net and every last entitlement, poverty would be eradicated within five years (plus no one would have to pay more than 5% of their income in any form of taxation).

Time to close the thread, guys.

Came here to post this

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Good people don't decide to become police officers.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

So... de-modding BK for what he did is okay.  But Kalwejt should be defended?

Sorry, Kal.. you should be de-modded.  And evergreen should be reinstated.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Name sounds Jewish. Smh.

It was deleted, but wtf?

Hope he isn't, but if he is, then there's another far-left Jew in politics doing his best to make America less great. It doesn't reflect well on us. If your brother was in the news for stealing something you'd also be more ashamed than if it were some random person you don't know.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Name sounds Jewish. Smh.

It was deleted, but wtf?

Hope he isn't, but if he is, then there's another far-left Jew in politics doing his best to make America less great. It doesn't reflect well on us. If your brother was in the news for stealing something you'd also be more ashamed than if it were some random person you don't know.

Jews aren't your brothers. It's more like if my tenth cousin who looks somewhat like me and is my denomination is arrested and in the news.

Not sure what's going on, but you don't get to dictate how we view our fellow tribe members.

Neither does DavidB since he's just one member of our tribe.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

The left does this all the time. I won't condone his comments but evergreen says far worse every day.

I think that's a little bit of an exaggeration (although Evergreen calling ExtremistRepublican "the product of a failed abortion" was pretty disgusting), but I'd be fine with banning both of them.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

On Congressman Al Green:

...

classic "reformed" white nationalist sanchez!

...