The Klartext Landfill for Absurd, Ignorant, and Deplorable Posts VI

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Anyone wanting to ban pornography is a fascist who should have no say in a free society. Those feminists have the right to their opinion, but they shouldn't describe themselves as liberal in any way.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Anyone wanting to ban pornography is a fascist who should have no say in a free society. Those feminists have the right to their opinion, but they shouldn't describe themselves as liberal in any way.

I mean, yes, all pornography that is legitimate and doesn't involve any type of exploitation that involves performers who are capable of consenting to be involved should not be banned no matter how little it does for society. Regardless of the content of the second sentence or the use of the word "fascist," I hope the reason that this post is in here isn't about his rightful belief that pornography in general should never be allowed to be banned.

Although I do disagree with his position, the post is here not because of the substance of that position but because muh porn is apparently such a moral shibboleth for him that he calls people fascists for disagreeing with him. That should be reserved for disagreements involving things like racial hatred and banning speech critical of the government.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Anyone wanting to ban pornography is a fascist who should have no say in a free society. Those feminists have the right to their opinion, but they shouldn't describe themselves as liberal in any way.

Yes, because no one else here uses hyperbole.

You'll forgive me for not being able to tell you were being hyperbolic when we have plenty of posters who say things like this and mean it.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Yes, obviously, and it's integral that the victory of the free market be defended.

I see the political freedom is secondary to you.

Political freedom is but a vehicle for economic freedom, silly man.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

In the 'Bigoted' category

representatives of religious organisations have no business in an hospital.

It's also one of the most absurd things I've ever read on this forum.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

The first Republican President was Lincoln. The first Democrat President was Jackson. So obviously, the Democrats are historically the better party,

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

The first Republican President was Lincoln. The first Democrat President was Jackson. So obviously, the Democrats are historically the better party,

I guess by this logic the Mexican PRI is the awesomest party due to being around since the 1920s?

My fear is that Santander means that Jackson was a better president than Lincoln.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Very similar to me.  I actually dislike Trump as a person and all things equal prefer Clinton policies overall when compared to Trump but will vote for him for being anti-PC.  Also I want to vote for White consolidation.

This is a great example of what not to do with your vote.

What the hell does "white consolidation" mean?

Oh God, I warned you guys that Rachel Dolezel would lead to confused and deranged "trans-racial" people coming out of the woodwork and tanning salons

I consider myself trans-racial.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I mean, you could make an argument for Human Stain-type situations, and for the kinds of people or groups that 'become' sociologically white over the years (e.g. Eye-talians back in the day; I've seen this in action with a very fair-skinned Latina I'm friends with), but that's not what 'transracial' is used (when it is used) to mean.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Very similar to me.  I actually dislike Trump as a person and all things equal prefer Clinton policies overall when compared to Trump but will vote for him for being anti-PC.  Also I want to vote for White consolidation.

Is he a West Virginian?

LOL, like clockwork, you never fail to show up when WV is mentioned...

You never fail to bring WV up out of nowhere, you're less amusing than IndyRep's NH thing.

It wasn't out of nowhere. That post had a very WV-esque sentiment. Though now that you mention it, the fact that he used a big word like "consolidation" is kind of a dead giveaway he's not a West Virginian...

Will you give it a rest?!

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

You guys need to learn how to meme properly.  It takes time, yes, but before you know it you'll be shifting election polls and making your shallow perceptions of where a state's political leanings should be become reality.  Just like TNVol and myself.

maek u think

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

California should give up non-partisan redistricting. No sense in unilaterally disarming,

Don't worry. If VRA2 is not repealed, the new Department of Justice will make sure that whites get proper VRA districts in California.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

A bloodbath favoring the Republicans, or a bloodbath against the Republicans?

We do have to face this reality: Progressives have the natural right to have their side in charge. Nature is progressive. To enforce a progressive agenda is Nature's way.

Creepy.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

In answer to 'when America stopped being great':

2013 when the top marginal rates went up and along with the Obamacare taxes.  My plan based these tax rates is to go into semi-retirement in end of 2018 and go into perm retirement around 2022.  The election of Trump was a surprise for me.  If Trump manages to reduce the top marginal tax rates and get rid of the Obamacare taxes I will most likely delay my retirement plans by 3-5 years at least.   I am hopeful this will take place but not betting on it.  Will wait and see.

His other answer in the same thread--revolving around how America is becoming less Eurocentric, and how that means that 'even as an extreme atheist' (his words) he's upset by ~the War on Christmas~--is bad as well but at least it didn't literally say that the country is only great to the extent that its tax code benefits him personally. What in the world is wrong with jaichind?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

As a person: Vile scumbag
As president-elect: Completely incompetent and pandering exclusively to the alt right

Well, you would post this here, wouldn't you?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

As a person: Vile scumbag
As president-elect: Completely incompetent and pandering exclusively to the alt right

Well, you would post this here, wouldn't you?

Many people posted negative opinions of Trump in that thread. There is a reason why I singled out that post.

Is it because Trump is pandering to people who aren't, technically, part of the alt-right? I'll concede that point, but pandering to unreconstructed neocons and senescent kleptocratic industrialists isn't really that much better.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I think people might be at least slightly more accepting of the Electoral College if it manifestly represented some sort of identifiable interest other than a 'weighted' version of the popular vote. There might actually be less of a democratic deficit if it were explicitly a proxy for Congress or state governments or something and the system didn't insult people's intelligence by going through the motions of having a nationwide popular election (or 'muh fifty-one separate elections', whatever).

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

This election was held just weeks after LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act. I assume the WWC voted in huge numbers against him, maybe 70-80%, given how they are mostly a load of brainless racist tossers?

I'm certain that's sarcastic.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Demographics are destiny.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I think the sassy chip in the Jerrybot is malfunctioning. Better call Apple.

Or it's finals week and I really don't have time for racists like you or douchbags like Cathcon.

Not familiar with traditional spelling, but I believe it's "douchebag".

In all honesty, sounds like stress is getting the best of you.

Yeah his posts sound like my mother at the peak of her alcoholism right before she'd start screaming and slapping me in the Publix checkout line.

You really have had a sh**t life haven't you.  is that why you have to troll.  To get the attention that you always needed as a child?

Why would I want that? That sounds like too much attention if you ask me. It's actually rather embarrassing. As is your meltdown.

What meltdown.  Calling out the Nazi and asking someone who is a douchebag frat boy to stop correcting me is a meltdown?  You need to check your definition is that is so.

Are you okay?

Yeah.  Why?  I know I shouldn't respond to Sanchez but the dude it an unabashed racist.  I don't take kindly to people like that, why I call him out on all his sh**t.  And Cathcon is just a douche, which is something I also don't like.

I agree that Sanchez is awful, but I'm not sure what your beef is with Cathcon, but regardless, you seem to be getting way too worked up about this.  It's just an obscure internet forum.

This isn't getting worked up.  It is responding to the crap they post.  I don't see how it can be read any other way.

You're on your second page of sniping about this.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Abortion should be safe, legal, and encouraged, if not mandatory for immature teenage girls who are driving up our poverty rate.

You beat me to it. I don't even have words for that. Mandatory abortions...

The cause of most problems in today's society is the fact that stupid people are allowed to breed. In fact, they're fast out-pacing non stupid people. Most issues we have today, including viral videos, welfare families, victimhood mentalities, and most hate issues are simply the chickens coming home to roost. I think you ought to have to get a license to have a child, and you have to pass the same tests as you do to adopt a child. Nobody hears about an alcoholic, heroin-addicted, non-functioning junkie being granted custody of a child, and yet that tramp is allowed to pop out a kid.

Speaking as the product of a crisis pregnancy between a mentally ill mother and a drug-addicted father--as someone who grew up poor (and, yes, on welfare), and has 'bettered' himself through a combination of good parenting (by said mentally ill mother! Imagine that!), brains, and fortuitous marriages in the family but hopes he never forgets where he came from--you can take this vile idea with its crabbed and rank wickedness straight back to hell where it belongs, you miserable Hitlerite cur.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Probably. It usually never ends well when I'm unmedicated.

So ... take it.

I'm heavily medicated as well and, even though Wolverine is still a miserable Hitlerite cur if what he was saying reflects his actual views (hidden or otherwise), I have to defend him in that it's often not nearly as simple as just 'take it', especially for someone with executive dysfunction and/or a complicated med regime.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Well, you would say that, wouldn't you?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Context not needed but does make the post even worse:

I wouldn't mind checking out Italy during the 1920s-1930s

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Was Jerry always this aggro?