"Repeal the 19th Amendment" is now a thing

[Blue3]

Trump Supporters Rally for Women to Lose the Right to Vote With #RepealThe19th

https://www.yahoo.com/style/why-repealthe19th-is-trending-171133471.html








What percentage of Trump voters do you think would actually accept its repeal?

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

Bet Nate Silver didn't see that one coming either.

[dspNY]

Trump Supporters Rally for Women to Lose the Right to Vote With #RepealThe19th

https://www.yahoo.com/style/why-repealthe19th-is-trending-171133471.html








What percentage of Trump voters do you think would actually accept its repeal?

Clinton was right about that deplorables remark. Maybe not the percentage, but deplorables many of them are

[Suburbia]

How foolish

[RI]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

[eric82oslo]

Do Trump's female supporters agree with this as well?
Newsflash: I wouldn't be surprised if they actually do.

[Maxwell]

the more these people come out of the woodwork, the more I think the globalist marxist socialist ideals that they claim Obama and Clinton espouse (but really don't believe in) would be terrific for our country.

[Rand]

I'm surprised Trump supporters know there are more than two amendments.

[JA]

No demographic characteristic can define a Trump supporter better than the psychological profile of an authoritarian personality.

[Kingpoleon]

I'm surprised Trump supporters know there are more than two amendments.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

I'm surprised Trump supporters know there are more than two amendments.

They definitely know about the second amendment. I doubt they know any of the others.

[HisGrace]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

Trump supporters have spent the entire campaign trying to convince people not to take things they/their candidate says seriously, and then getting mad when people don't take them seriously.

I'm surprised Trump supporters know there are more than two amendments.

Definitely don't know about the First Amendment. They probably think that they just started the amendments at two.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

Wasn't it you who was whining a month ago about people from Twitter and Tumblr promoting violence against straight white men?

Needless to say this isn't the first time you've defended blatant misogyny, though.  So I guess we shouldn't be surprised.

[RI]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

Wasn't it you who was whining a month ago about people from Twitter and Tumblr promoting violence against straight white men?

Needless to say this isn't the first time you've defended blatant misogyny, though.  So I guess we shouldn't be surprised.

That was my point; apparently SJWs on Twitter are just "venting" and shouldn't be taken seriously, but these people clearly should be as it's politically convenient and conforms to preconceived leftist notions.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

Wasn't it you who was whining a month ago about people from Twitter and Tumblr promoting violence against straight white men?

Needless to say this isn't the first time you've defended blatant misogyny, though.  So I guess we shouldn't be surprised.

That was my point; apparently SJWs on Twitter are just "venting" and shouldn't be taken seriously, but these people clearly should be as it's politically convenient.

And which side has been more effective in taking their abhorrent views to the mainstream this election cycle?

[Grumpier Than Thou]

"but his supporters aren't running for President"

[HisGrace]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

Wasn't it you who was whining a month ago about people from Twitter and Tumblr promoting violence against straight white men?

Needless to say this isn't the first time you've defended blatant misogyny, though.  So I guess we shouldn't be surprised.

That was my point; apparently SJWs on Twitter are just "venting" and shouldn't be taken seriously, but these people clearly should be as it's politically convenient and conforms to preconceived leftist notions.

I don't like SJW's on social media either but they don't have a major party presidential candidate promoting their views so at the moment they are less of a threat Trump and his ilk.

[Associate Justice PiT]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

We have a presidential candidate essentially leading his campaign via Twitter.  It's unfortunate; but this is a real way people communicate and how ideas can spread.

     The very notion of communicating political ideas in spurts of 140 characters is something that I find profoundly disturbing. Neither measure nor nuance is feasible in such a small space and you get a platform tailor-made for extremism.

[Joe Republic]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

We have a presidential candidate essentially leading his campaign via Twitter.  It's unfortunate; but this is a real way people communicate and how ideas can spread.

     The very notion of communicating political ideas in spurts of 140 characters is something that I find profoundly disturbing. Neither measure nor nuance is feasible in such a small space and you get a platform tailor-made for extremism.

Thank you.  I thought I was going crazy.

[Cruzcrew]

Aren't most of the people who use that repeal the 19th amendment just joking to trigger liberals?

[ElectionsGuy]

Aren't most of the people who use that repeal the 19th amendment just joking to trigger liberals?

Yes and this threads proves they're successful.

[Kingpoleon]

This isn't Trump himself, so it's okay. #PodestaBillandMookLogic

[Associate Justice PiT]

Oh, so now it's okay to take Twitter hashtags seriously.

We have a presidential candidate essentially leading his campaign via Twitter.  It's unfortunate; but this is a real way people communicate and how ideas can spread.

     The very notion of communicating political ideas in spurts of 140 characters is something that I find profoundly disturbing. Neither measure nor nuance is feasible in such a small space and you get a platform tailor-made for extremism.

Thank you.  I thought I was going crazy.

     I recently found a post of mine from 2009 where I scoffed at the notion of Twitter ever becoming a serious platform. If ever I made a prediction that should have come true and didn't it was that one.

[Maxwell]

Aren't most of the people who use that repeal the 19th amendment just joking to trigger liberals?

their life seems to revolve around "triggering liberals".

[HisGrace]

Aren't most of the people who use that repeal the 19th amendment just joking to trigger liberals?

their life seems to revolve around "triggering liberals".

I don't like manufactured PC outrage as much as the next person, but saying blatantly racist/sexist stuff just to troll is pathetic and sort of proves their point.