The Atlas Hillary obsession

[Figueira]

Atlas is not in love with Hillary.

But the point is you'd be very hard-pushed to find another online forum in which she has as much support as on here.

I found one!

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Easy. She's a smart able and policy focused person with a record of achievement. She's about the job, not the show. Of course she's flawed, but we all are, but the rest of us don't have a 40 year public record, there were problematic decisions but not once has evidence been found of willful wrong-doing.

In short, she's tough, smart, able and determined. It's why I've been a fan for years, supported her in 08 and again this time.

[Phony Moderate]

Easy. She's a smart able and policy focused person with a record of achievement. She's about the job, not the show. Of course she's flawed, but we all are, but the rest of us don't have a 40 year public record, there were problematic decisions but not once has evidence been found of willful wrong-doing.

In short, she's tough, smart, able and determined. It's why I've been a fan for years, supported her in 08 and again this time.

I'd apply all those descriptions to Thatcher too.

[Middle-aged Europe]

Despite the pics in my signature, I tend to view Hillary rather pragmatically.

I support her because she happens to be the Democratic Party's presidential nominee and because Donald Trump would be the worst U.S. president since... probably ever. Trump makes Hillary look like Mother Teresa.

Personally, I would have preferred a younger and fresher face as the Democratic nominee though.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Easy. She's a smart able and policy focused person with a record of achievement. She's about the job, not the show. Of course she's flawed, but we all are, but the rest of us don't have a 40 year public record, there were problematic decisions but not once has evidence been found of willful wrong-doing.

In short, she's tough, smart, able and determined. It's why I've been a fan for years, supported her in 08 and again this time.

I'd apply all those descriptions to Thatcher too.

Indeed, except this one isn't cruel or as dogmatic

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Easy. She's a smart able and policy focused person with a record of achievement. She's about the job, not the show. Of course she's flawed, but we all are, but the rest of us don't have a 40 year public record, there were problematic decisions but not once has evidence been found of willful wrong-doing.

I don't see anything very impressive about her resume. A botched health care reform, very uneventful Senate term and I'm not particularly wild about her time as SoS ("Reset", mishandled Libya and Syria). Obama's second term was much more successfull in foreign affairs.

I agree she had a lot of experience, but let's drop with this "muh great accomplishments" nonsense. It's also irrelevant. Many successfull Presidents had poor record before. I mean, what was Obama's resume?

In my opinion (biased, like every personal opinion) Hillary seems like a very generic politician. Of course I take her not just over Trump, but basically any Republican.

As far as personality is concerned, I actually find her much more likeable than it's being frequently suggested. Certainly better than Bill.