Juming on the bandwagon (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:52:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Juming on the bandwagon (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Juming on the bandwagon  (Read 965 times)
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
« on: July 04, 2005, 11:09:45 PM »

Here's a very optimistic prediction:



Unless you have Schweitzer on the ticket, no way that happens.  And even then, it still doesn't happen.


To all Democrats:  Just Because You Won Montana In 1992 (winning less of the vote than you did in 2004, I might add) Does Not Mean You Will Win The State In The Next Twenty Years Unless Your Name Is Schweitzer.
I have to agree with Erc.  One thing I also can't understand is that libertarian=winning Montana.  If anything Montana is neutral between libertarian/populist and is moving populist (because of corporate abuses and things like that).  Schweitzer campaigned among the people.  He looks like a rancher.  He's a down to earth populist, that's how he won.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2005, 11:11:30 PM »

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.