Frank Underwood's District
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:12:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Frank Underwood's District
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Frank Underwood's District  (Read 761 times)
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 17, 2016, 01:23:56 PM »

Maybe the wrong section, I'm not sure.

Frank Underwood, as a Congressman, represented the South Carolin a 5th. In real life, that District is R+9, and the only Democratic-friendly district is the D+16, minority-majority SC 6th, currently represented by Jim Clyburn.

If Frank was a real man, what real district would he likely represent in SC? Could he win in the real-world 5th? How would the 5th need to be changed in order to be friendly to Frank?

--

Assume Frank is a Citadel graduate.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2016, 01:48:46 PM »

A democrat who is pretty conservative and brings home the bacon could probably represent SC-5, even if it is a bit of a stretch. Underwood seems to get clownish GOP opposition in the district as is.

That being said, I think Underwood would never be followed up by a Democrat ever again.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,120
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2016, 01:55:31 PM »

A democrat who is pretty conservative and brings home the bacon could probably represent SC-5, even if it is a bit of a stretch. Underwood seems to get clownish GOP opposition in the district as is.

That being said, I think Underwood would never be followed up by a Democrat ever again.
Underwood basically fits his region perfectly and breaks the mold by being 500% more competent than any other congressional leader or individual.

In his world, SC-5 is probably D+3-5, mainly because of his personal influence.
Logged
diptheriadan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2016, 02:01:29 PM »
« Edited: October 19, 2016, 07:01:39 PM by diptheriadan »

It isn't really unrealistic. Back in 1990, when Frank was elected, Democrat John M. Spratt, Jr. represented the district. Even if Frank was just a normal politican, he likely would've held the district. I would imagine that with him being as effective of a congressman as he was, he would have no trouble getting reelected.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2016, 04:08:33 PM »

If there was a Clyburn figure in the SC delegation, he'd have already been a big player in the show. I always assumed that the districts are drawn entirely different and that Frank Underwood's district, while containing a significant rural portion (Gafney), is mainly anchored out of Columbia.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.