Poll: Which of these blue states would Kasich have won?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:55:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Poll: Which of these blue states would Kasich have won? 		« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Pick the states from this list that you think Kasich would have won; you can pick as many as all 9
#1
Maine		  
#2
New Hampshire		  
#3
Connecticut		  
#4
New Jersey		  
#5
Pennsylvania		  
#6
Michigan		  
#7
Wisconsin		  
#8
Minnesota		  
#9
Oregon		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 70

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Poll: Which of these blue states would Kasich have won?  (Read 1231 times)
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 18, 2016, 03:52:14 PM »
POLL
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,130
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2016, 03:55:44 PM »
Perhaps WI, NH, and ME-2 if he was lucky.
Logged
Fargobison
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,692


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2016, 03:56:59 PM »
WI, PA and NH.

I guess you can toss in ME-2 as well.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2016, 04:02:31 PM »
« Edited: October 18, 2016, 04:04:27 PM by Yank2133 »
None since he is a Republican.
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 737
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2016, 04:06:42 PM »

This.
Logged
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2016, 04:13:34 PM »

Kasich, an experienced moderate Republican, would have CRUSHED the corrupt unlikable far left Hillary. PA, NH, ME02, WI, would have been slam dunks. Even Dubya lost WI by less than 0.5% in both 00 and 04 and lost MN by just 2.4% in 00 and 3.5% in 04.
Logged
Blackacre
Spenstar3D
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -7.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2016, 04:15:13 PM »
Quote from: Arbitrage1980 on October 18, 2016, 04:13:34 PM

Kasich, an experienced moderate Republican, would have CRUSHED the corrupt unlikable far left Hillary. PA, NH, ME02, WI, would have been slam dunks. Even Dubya lost WI by less than 0.5% in both 00 and 04 and lost MN by just 2.4% in 00 and 3.5% in 04.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

He's no moderate. He's a far-right prick dressed in moderate clothing that would have been torn to pieces by Clinton oppo
Logged
Orthogonian Society Treasurer
CommanderClash
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,561
Bermuda


Political Matrix
E: 0.32, S: 4.78

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2016, 04:15:43 PM »
Kasich would've had an outside shot in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and perhaps Minnesota; Clinton would be favoured in all three, however.
Logged
Lachi
lok1999
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,351
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -1.06, S: -3.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 18, 2016, 04:16:33 PM »
Quote from: Arbitrage1980 on October 18, 2016, 04:13:34 PM

Kasich, an experienced moderate Republican, would have CRUSHED the corrupt unlikable far left Hillary. PA, NH, ME02, WI, would have been slam dunks. Even Dubya lost WI by less than 0.5% in both 00 and 04 and lost MN by just 2.4% in 00 and 3.5% in 04.
I hope you're joking there. Kasich is about as right wing as any other republican who ran this year. He is more to the right than Hillary is to the left
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2016, 04:18:32 PM »
Quote from: Zombie Spenstar on October 18, 2016, 04:15:13 PM
Quote from: Arbitrage1980 on October 18, 2016, 04:13:34 PM

Kasich, an experienced moderate Republican, would have CRUSHED the corrupt unlikable far left Hillary. PA, NH, ME02, WI, would have been slam dunks. Even Dubya lost WI by less than 0.5% in both 00 and 04 and lost MN by just 2.4% in 00 and 3.5% in 04.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

He's no moderate. He's a far-right prick dressed in moderate clothing that would have been torn to pieces by Clinton oppo

Yeah, it is complete GOP revisionist history to make themselves feel better.

As much as R's on here want to believe, Trump isn't some aberration. The base and the party platform is completely out of step with where America is right now and that is why they keep losing presidential elections.

Kasich, Rubio, Walker etc. None of these people are flipping any blue states given where the party is right now in 2016.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2016, 05:07:21 PM »
Where's the NOTA option?

He could have won some of these (NH would probably be the most likely), but he wouldn't be favored in any of them.
Logged
PeteB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,874
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2016, 05:10:29 PM »
He would have a serious chance in all except for CT, NJ and OR.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,236
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2016, 05:15:48 PM »
All of them, assuming that Hillary is still the Democrat's nominee.

If Trump was against a competent Democrat, there would be a similar landslide.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2016, 05:16:51 PM »
« Edited: October 18, 2016, 05:34:29 PM by Maxwell »
but he didn't get the nomination.

like it wasn't even close.

he only stayed in long enough to win a state. if he hadn't it would've been as hopeless as ron paul.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2016, 05:23:34 PM »
PA, NJ, WI, NH. Kasich would have won Summit, NJ, and maybe Edison, NJ.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2016, 05:26:16 PM »

Don't kill their fantasy.
Logged
Pyro
PyroTheFox
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,705
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2016, 05:50:58 PM »
"well, I am only somewhat against those greedy industrial trade unions."
Loses literally the entire Rust Belt
"oh geez, oh man."
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2016, 06:20:50 PM »
Quote from: Fargobison on October 18, 2016, 03:56:59 PM
WI, PA and NH.

I guess you can toss in ME-2 as well.
Logged
HisGrace
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,557
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2016, 06:22:50 PM »
Keep in mind that in the spring, when Clinton was polling better against Trump than she was now, polls had Kasich tied/leading Clinton in Connecticut and NJ, and winning all through the rust belt. Also keep in mind that Trump/Clinton was a dead heat until Trump imploded with PussyGate and his debate performances. Kasich could have won any of those and would likely have won with over 300 EV.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 18, 2016, 06:44:13 PM »
PA, WI, and MN.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 18, 2016, 06:53:49 PM »
How can I pick 0?

Kasich would have been destroyed by now based on his Lehman Brothers involvement when the bank went bust. And he's a spineless RINO, so he wouldn't fight back effectively.
Logged
PeteB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,874
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 18, 2016, 07:17:11 PM »
Quote from: Seriously? on October 18, 2016, 06:53:49 PM
How can I pick 0?

Kasich would have been destroyed by now based on his Lehman Brothers involvement when the bank went bust. And he's a spineless RINO, so he wouldn't fight back effectively.

No worries - you already picked a zero..the guy you are supporting Sad.

And if Kasich were in contention, Lehman would be just a ripple in the flow of Benghazi, email server, Goldman Sachs speeches and all the other Clinton issues. In short all those shortcomings that Trump can't take advantage of since he is such a hyper-flawed candidate.
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,364
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 18, 2016, 07:27:28 PM »

and maaaaaaaaaaybe New Hampshire.
Logged
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 18, 2016, 08:03:13 PM »
Quote from: HisGrace on October 18, 2016, 06:22:50 PM
Keep in mind that in the spring, when Clinton was polling better against Trump than she was now, polls had Kasich tied/leading Clinton in Connecticut and NJ, and winning all through the rust belt. Also keep in mind that Trump/Clinton was a dead heat until Trump imploded with PussyGate and his debate performances. Kasich could have won any of those and would likely have won with over 300 EV.

Yup. The ONLY reason Hillary will be our 45th President is because my party, the same party that nominated Lincoln, Eisenhower, Reagan, HW Bush, absolutely lost its mind and nominated Donald J. Trump, the worst major party nominee in ALL of American history. Out of the 17 Republicans who ran this year, roughly a dozen of them would have beaten Hillary. Kasich or Rubio would have given the GOP its biggest presidential victory since HW Bush 1988.
Logged
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 18, 2016, 08:04:00 PM »
Quote from: PeteB on October 18, 2016, 07:17:11 PM
Quote from: Seriously? on October 18, 2016, 06:53:49 PM
How can I pick 0?

Kasich would have been destroyed by now based on his Lehman Brothers involvement when the bank went bust. And he's a spineless RINO, so he wouldn't fight back effectively.

No worries - you already picked a zero..the guy you are supporting Sad.

And if Kasich were in contention, Lehman would be just a ripple in the flow of Benghazi, email server, Goldman Sachs speeches and all the other Clinton issues. In short all those shortcomings that Trump can't take advantage of since he is such a hyper-flawed candidate.

Compared to Hillary's corruption, lies, e-mails, etc., Kasich would have looked like Lincoln.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 15 queries.