Does Wikileaks have anything more on DNC/HRC/etc megethread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:55:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Does Wikileaks have anything more on DNC/HRC/etc megethread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Does Wikileaks have anything more on DNC/HRC/etc megethread  (Read 11317 times)
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« on: October 20, 2016, 05:46:23 PM »

What could they have, Donna Brazile didnt want Tim Kaine on the ticket so she emailed Podesta? John Podesta called both of them stupid and ugly? Seriously, I cant imagine this being some big bombshell.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2016, 05:53:16 PM »

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789237182817001473
@wikileaks
"@tomcoates If by 'partisan' you mean we have a position, then yes: @DonnaBrazile and @TimKaine are liars and they know they are lying."

Kaine and Brazile have been denying the authenticity of the leaked documents. Im not sure how wikileaks plans to prove both of them are lying.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2016, 06:27:07 PM »

They just posted a link to an article on their twitter about how Clinton surrogates can't back up the fabrication claims. Is that the surprise?
 
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2016, 06:32:26 PM »

They just posted a link to an article on their twitter about how Clinton surrogates can't back up the fabrication claims. Is that the surprise?
 

they are going to gave some kind of "proof" their content is real.

(or at least some parts, which is the common position atm)

How though? Outside of giving us access to John Podesta's email address, I cant think of any type of proof.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2016, 06:57:34 PM »

I've been watching the Wikileaks twitter and its kind of funny how they've admitted Hillary is probably going to win. They're claiming the election has been rigged, but I'm assuming that means they've got nothing damaging left.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2016, 07:02:40 PM »

what a coincidence that O'Keefe also suddenly talks a lot about Brazile. (seemingly cause the names unearthed by O'Keefe also appear in Wikileaks emails)

he claims to publish audio tape about meetings with the white house next week.....guess obama himself is going to order the voter fraud squad how to do their job!!!!11111!1!!!


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/789221816506064896?lang=de

"May", which means shes not actually involved. Its just more videos with Creamer on the phone or something.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2016, 12:12:52 PM »

That video of Trump will become small potatoes in about a week or two with the videos coming IMO, words vs. actions, big big difference....watch and see.

Like the two other O'Keefe videos that were supposed to destroy Hillary's campaign but havent had any effect?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.