2016: Romney runs as the Indy conservative candidate rather than McMullin
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 09:59:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  2016: Romney runs as the Indy conservative candidate rather than McMullin
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016: Romney runs as the Indy conservative candidate rather than McMullin  (Read 704 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 23, 2016, 04:26:22 PM »

Given McMullin's surge in Utah, it certainly looks like there's space for the right #NeverTrump conservative alternative candidate to gain traction in at least certain Republican states.  But McMullin is a nobody.  What if Romney had run 3rd party instead, and had actually started early enough to get ballot access in most states.  How would he end up doing?  Would he actually end up polling well enough to get in one or more debates?  What states would he finish in the top two in?  And would there be a mass defection of many GOP elites from Trump to Romney once the Trump sexual assault allegations came out?
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2016, 04:35:38 PM »

This is definitely entirely possible. Assuming the final result was something like 46-36-18, I could see this map happening:
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2016, 04:41:53 PM »

Trump wins a single-digit number of heavily white, culturally southern states. Romney wins a single-digit number of western states (maybe just those two). The two of them do similarly in the popular vote; can't say who would've done better there. Trump does better in the EV. Hillary is easily over 400.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2016, 05:16:28 PM »

Clinton - 48-49%
Trump - 32-35%
Romney - 14-17%
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2016, 07:40:58 PM »


460: Hillary Clinton/Xavier Becerra - 45.1%
46: Donald Trump/Bobby Jindal - 27.1%
32: Mitt Romney/Benjamin Sasse - 23.0%
Others - 4.0%
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2016, 06:00:07 AM »



Hillary Clinton/Tim Kaine-466
Donald J. Trump/Mike Pence-55
Mitt Romney/Ben Sasse-17


Trump wins NE-01? Lincoln? Ok then whatever you say...
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,820
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2016, 10:28:43 AM »

Trump wins a single-digit number of heavily white, culturally southern states. Romney wins a single-digit number of western states (maybe just those two). The two of them do similarly in the popular vote; can't say who would've done better there. Trump does better in the EV. Hillary is easily over 400.

These places don't exist.  West Virginia and Kentucky are not "culturally southern", and all of the "culturally southern" states are heavily African-American.   
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.