Is Colorado a solidly (non-Atlas) "blue" state?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 07:06:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Is Colorado a solidly (non-Atlas) "blue" state?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is Colorado a solidly (non-Atlas) "blue" state?
#1
Yes, at all levels of government
 
#2
Yes, but only in presidential and Senate elections
 
#3
Yes, but only in presidential elections
 
#4
No, but it is becoming one in presidential elections
 
#5
No, but it is becoming one in both presidential and Senate elections
 
#6
No, but it is becoming one at all levels of government
 
#7
No, at all levels of government
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: Is Colorado a solidly (non-Atlas) "blue" state?  (Read 1050 times)
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 25, 2016, 11:24:25 AM »

I'd say it's still at Option 4, but with the way things appear to be trending, it will soon be at Option 3.

However, Colorado is still a very "purple" state overall, with almost equal numbers of strong partisans in both parties, but a larger share of "weak" partisans across the board. And unfortunately - as has been the case in much of the country - the demographics that have been strongly contributing to Colorado's Democratic trend are rather unreliable in midterm elections i.e. Latinos and young voters in general (with the former being a significant - and growing - percentage of the latter).

Furthermore, the Democratic Party has also been starting to get the votes of many traditionally Republican (or more likely, "weak" Republican) voters in the state, and they are by no means a liberal bunch except on the Culture Wars (and even then, it's not that big of a priority either way for many of them). So they are certainly not a reliable voter base especially considering the emerging trend of the Democrats being pulled leftward by the likes of Bernie Sanders.

It will be interesting to see what happens when the only viable choices for President are a Democrat more or less in the mold of Bernie Sanders and a Republican more or less in the mold of Donald Trump (which really seems to be the way things are heading in the respective major parties). I suspect that there will be a lot more third-party votes from many traditional Republicans - which will only help the Democrats as reactionary, far-right whites continue to die off or otherwise shrink as a share of the electorate. Tongue
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2016, 12:18:08 PM »

It is becoming one in presidential elections. As far as Senate elections go, we'll have to wait for 2020 to find out.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,028
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2016, 01:13:17 PM »

I honestly don't know if 2016 can tell us anything...
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,746


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2016, 01:39:57 PM »

I honestly don't know if 2016 can tell us anything...
Logged
andrew_c
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 454
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2016, 02:16:36 PM »

Currently, no, but Trump is certainly pushing the state that way.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2016, 02:20:52 PM »

The 2014 Senate election was pretty telling. A gigantic national GOP wave, low turnout, with a top tier recruit (probably the best the COGOP had/has) running against a candidate who based his campaign so heavily on abortion that he was constantly mocked and got the nickname Mark Uterus. Even in this perfect storm for the GOP, Gardner still only won by <2 points and didn't crack 50%.

So, I wouldn't say solid, but CO is definitely looking like a blue state.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2016, 03:31:14 PM »

No -- the Democratic base in Colorado is well-educated white voters; exactly a type who (assuming parties stay roughly, ideologically, as the coalitions they are now; may be an iffy assumption) will vote Democratic most of the time but will be prone to occasionally defecting towards the Republicans en masse.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,028
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2016, 04:33:36 PM »

No -- the Democratic base in Colorado is well-educated white voters; exactly a type who (assuming parties stay roughly, ideologically, as the coalitions they are now; may be an iffy assumption) will vote Democratic most of the time but will be prone to occasionally defecting towards the Republicans en masse.

Yeah, I'll go ahead and say their base is minoroties, like almost everywhere else.
Logged
Roronoa D. Law
Patrick97
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2016, 04:54:31 PM »

Can't be determined right now because Democrats had preferable environment to win Colorado in the past two and current election. Also the white vote fluctuate to much.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,892
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2016, 05:06:03 PM »

Can't be determined right now because Democrats had preferable environment to win Colorado in the past two and current election. Also the white vote fluctuate to much.

Do you mean 'preferable' in the sense that Democrats won (or will) each time? Because 2012 wasn't what I'd call preferable.

I suppose you could argue that it's not that safe to say right now because it's untested in such a situation, but all the other markers there suggest a state moving away from the GOP. Even if it's still winnable for the GOP, I hardly expect them to put up a candidate that is acceptable to CO voters anytime soon, by which time it'll then probably be off the table.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 26, 2016, 12:30:39 PM »

No -- the Democratic base in Colorado is well-educated white voters; exactly a type who (assuming parties stay roughly, ideologically, as the coalitions they are now; may be an iffy assumption) will vote Democratic most of the time but will be prone to occasionally defecting towards the Republicans en masse.

Yeah, I'll go ahead and say their base is minoroties, like almost everywhere else.

OK -- educated young white voters are an unusually important part of the coalition in Colorado, and capable of throwing the election to the Republicans singlehandedly.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,836
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 26, 2016, 12:39:51 PM »

If the Republican party follows Trump's lead and becomes a populist far-right, white-grievance party, then yes.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 26, 2016, 12:49:57 PM »

It's certainly been heading in that direction.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 26, 2016, 03:53:47 PM »

It is only solidly blue in this presidential election. Had Cruz, Kasich, or anybody else been the nominee Colorado would be competitive this year. So no to all.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 26, 2016, 06:23:50 PM »

Not even close.  While it's trended D over the last few years, I doubt this is a so much a long-term trend as it is a reflection of how the nation has a whole has shifted leftward.
Logged
Sedona
Rookie
**
Posts: 82
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.78

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2016, 06:32:30 PM »

It's certainly moving in the Democrats' direction, but it's still far from being a safe blue state.  If the Republicans had not nominated Colorado's version of Ted Cruz, they might be beating Bennet right now.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,060
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2016, 07:44:20 PM »

No -- the Democratic base in Colorado is well-educated white voters; exactly a type who (assuming parties stay roughly, ideologically, as the coalitions they are now; may be an iffy assumption) will vote Democratic most of the time but will be prone to occasionally defecting towards the Republicans en masse.

Yeah, I'll go ahead and say their base is minoroties, like almost everywhere else.

OK -- educated young white voters are an unusually important part of the coalition in Colorado, and capable of throwing the election to the Republicans singlehandedly.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.