Why haven't Democrats moved Illinois Gubernatorial races to Presidential years?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 09:42:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why haven't Democrats moved Illinois Gubernatorial races to Presidential years?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why haven't Democrats moved Illinois Gubernatorial races to Presidential years?  (Read 1110 times)
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 26, 2016, 04:46:02 PM »

After Pat Quinn's squeaker in 2010, why didn't Democrats in the Illinois Legislature immediately move to do this?  This way they would likely ensure that a Republican can't win the governorship and that they'd always have control over redistricting.  I believe the governor's race used to be held in Presidential years in this state prior to 1980.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2016, 05:36:10 PM »

Because the GOP will surely retaliate with an EV-by-CD referendum.

I would take that trade off.
Logged
ill ind
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2016, 05:05:08 PM »

Prior to 1978 they were on Presidential years.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,272
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2016, 11:40:07 PM »

Prior to 1978 they were on Presidential years.

Do we know why they changed it?
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2016, 12:39:19 AM »

^ In Florida had a similar switch in the 1960's, IIRC.
Logged
SamInTheSouth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 389


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2016, 06:38:32 PM »

After Pat Quinn's squeaker in 2010, why didn't Democrats in the Illinois Legislature immediately move to do this?  This way they would likely ensure that a Republican can't win the governorship and that they'd always have control over redistricting. 

How would it ensure that?  States vote one way for president and another way for governor all the time.  They are two different issues altogether.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2016, 07:26:14 PM »

After Pat Quinn's squeaker in 2010, why didn't Democrats in the Illinois Legislature immediately move to do this?  This way they would likely ensure that a Republican can't win the governorship and that they'd always have control over redistricting. 

How would it ensure that?  States vote one way for president and another way for governor all the time.  They are two different issues altogether.

Illinois barely ticket splits, hence why Durbin barely won in 2014.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2016, 07:27:45 PM »

Because the GOP will surely retaliate with an EV-by-CD referendum.

I would take that trade off.
I wouldn't. It just encourages gerrymanering.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2016, 07:39:50 PM »

Prior to 1978 they were on Presidential years.

Do we know why they changed it?

Because Democrats are idiots?
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,800


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2016, 11:38:46 PM »

It was done as a deal with between the Gov and Leg in 1976 and was placed as a constitutional amendment. It has been in effect since 1978. To switch back would require another Con Amend passed with supermajorities in the legislature and by the public.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.