absentee/early vote thread, part 2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:19:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  absentee/early vote thread, part 2
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 ... 78
Author Topic: absentee/early vote thread, part 2  (Read 112286 times)
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #425 on: November 03, 2016, 03:48:53 PM »

AZ early voting age groups broken down by party:
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #426 on: November 03, 2016, 04:20:09 PM »


CO as of 11/3/16



Republicans narrowed the gap but the remaining unaffiliated voters probably skew Democrats.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #427 on: November 03, 2016, 04:39:15 PM »

Steve Schale ‏@steveschale  4m4 minutes ago Florida, USA
Had this hunch that the GOP FL early vote numbers were a bit inflated by some old N. FL Dems who were Dem EV voters in 12, but switched 1/

Steve Schale ‏@steveschale  1m1 minute ago Florida, USA
Turns out almost 50k of GOP EV in 16 were Dem EV in 12. I'd be surprised if more than 1-2k of them had voted Dem since 1964 or 76. 2/2
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #428 on: November 03, 2016, 04:41:54 PM »

That's very good news. It was a hunch for a lot of people, but it's great to see it in the numbers. That's not a small bit of movement in such a close state.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,874
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #429 on: November 03, 2016, 04:45:19 PM »

Steve Schale ‏@steveschale  4m4 minutes ago Florida, USA
Had this hunch that the GOP FL early vote numbers were a bit inflated by some old N. FL Dems who were Dem EV voters in 12, but switched 1/

Steve Schale ‏@steveschale  1m1 minute ago Florida, USA
Turns out almost 50k of GOP EV in 16 were Dem EV in 12. I'd be surprised if more than 1-2k of them had voted Dem since 1964 or 76. 2/2

That means we need 50K less of a lead than Obama in 2012 to win FL, even taking into account Cubans swinging our way and non-affiliated Puerto Ricans voting Democratic
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #430 on: November 03, 2016, 04:48:09 PM »

to tell the truth, i wouldn't be shocked, if republicans have lead EV the last 2 elections too.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,874
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #431 on: November 03, 2016, 04:48:16 PM »

Iowa absentee ballots, 11/3

Ballot requests:

DEM: 263,559
GOP: 213,759
IND: 145,645
Other: 2,149

Ballots cast:

DEM: 227,684
GOP: 185,656
IND: 119,710
Other: 1,715

Dem ballot request lead at about 50K. Dem vote lead at 42K, down 500 from yesterday
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #432 on: November 03, 2016, 04:52:24 PM »

Ralston is doing a Facebook live on NV early voting in 10 minutes: https://www.facebook.com/KTNVLasVegas/
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #433 on: November 03, 2016, 04:55:05 PM »

Steve Schale ‏@steveschale  4m4 minutes ago Florida, USA
Had this hunch that the GOP FL early vote numbers were a bit inflated by some old N. FL Dems who were Dem EV voters in 12, but switched 1/

Steve Schale ‏@steveschale  1m1 minute ago Florida, USA
Turns out almost 50k of GOP EV in 16 were Dem EV in 12. I'd be surprised if more than 1-2k of them had voted Dem since 1964 or 76. 2/2

That means we need 50K less of a lead than Obama in 2012 to win FL, even taking into account Cubans swinging our way and non-affiliated Puerto Ricans voting Democratic

Doesn't it actually work out to 100k less?

Let's say in 2012 there were (totally making up these numbers) 2.0 million Dems and 1.9 million Reps voting early, or +100K Dems.

And if all of them also voted early in 2016, then the margin would now be tied at 1.95M Dems and Reps each.

So 2016 Dems would look like they were running 100K behind the 2012 margin when in fact they were even.
Logged
fldemfunds
Rookie
**
Posts: 168
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #434 on: November 03, 2016, 05:00:10 PM »

Steve Schale ‏@steveschale  4m4 minutes ago Florida, USA
Had this hunch that the GOP FL early vote numbers were a bit inflated by some old N. FL Dems who were Dem EV voters in 12, but switched 1/

Steve Schale ‏@steveschale  1m1 minute ago Florida, USA
Turns out almost 50k of GOP EV in 16 were Dem EV in 12. I'd be surprised if more than 1-2k of them had voted Dem since 1964 or 76. 2/2

That means we need 50K less of a lead than Obama in 2012 to win FL, even taking into account Cubans swinging our way and non-affiliated Puerto Ricans voting Democratic

Doesn't it actually work out to 100k less?

Let's say in 2012 there were (totally making up these numbers) 2.0 million Dems and 1.9 million Reps voting early, or +100K Dems.

And if all of them also voted early in 2016, then the margin would now be tied at 1.95M Dems and Reps each.

So 2016 Dems would look like they were running 100K behind the 2012 margin when in fact they were even.

Yo seriously. Can you all just read my post history? This is literally what's happening. Estimates of the party switching are anywhere from 200k-400k (Schale indicated 400k via tweet the other day after FINALLY acknowledging the structural assumptions being made based on past elections).
Logged
fldemfunds
Rookie
**
Posts: 168
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #435 on: November 03, 2016, 05:03:29 PM »

Florida - C+5 or more. It's going to be called early. Even if you assume both Trump and HRC are getting 90% of their respective votes each, NPAs break towards democratic candidates by 10-20% in FL. There are also significantly more NPAs this cycle.

If Democrats go into election day with a voter reg turnout advantage of 2-3 points, she may be approach 7-10 point territory depending on turnout on election day.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #436 on: November 03, 2016, 05:04:02 PM »
« Edited: November 03, 2016, 05:06:33 PM by Ozymandias »

daniel a. smith ‏@electionsmith  5m5 minutes ago
Exclusive: Who are the 412k Floridians who've already voted who registered after the 2012 presidential election?

https://electionsmith.wordpress.com/2016/11/03/of-the-more-than-1-1-million-floridians-who-have-cast-ballots-as-of-this-morning-412k/
Logged
alomas
Rookie
**
Posts: 237
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #437 on: November 03, 2016, 05:05:20 PM »

Florida - C+5 or more. It's going to be called early.
Today is 3 Nov nor 20 Oct.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #438 on: November 03, 2016, 05:06:18 PM »

Ralston answered my question! If you comment he'll answer it.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,874
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #439 on: November 03, 2016, 05:07:24 PM »

Ralston thinks Cortez Masto is slightly ahead of Heck in the Senate race
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,825


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #440 on: November 03, 2016, 05:10:55 PM »
« Edited: November 03, 2016, 05:41:19 PM by Zyzz »


Republicans outnumbered Democrats by 4 points in CO in 2012, while losing  by 5 points. Independents must skew heavily Democratic in CO.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #441 on: November 03, 2016, 05:12:44 PM »

Ralston answered my question! If you comment he'll answer it.

He "dissed" Nate's model a bit Smiley
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #442 on: November 03, 2016, 05:13:30 PM »

Ralston answered my question! If you comment he'll answer it.

He "dissed" Nate's model a bit Smiley

Considering how obviously wrong it is about NV, I'm not surprised.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #443 on: November 03, 2016, 05:16:21 PM »

He says he'll make a public prediction online on Sunday.
Logged
fldemfunds
Rookie
**
Posts: 168
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #444 on: November 03, 2016, 05:16:27 PM »

Since everyone posts Schale's stuff. Here's an example of why his analysis is fundamentally incomplete:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
[/quote]

So based strictly on this, he asserts Dems have a 29k voter advantage for the day. He literally disregards 23% of the electorate. If NPAs are going to Hillary 55-45, you add another 3-4k votes on the margin in just these three counties on just this day.

Across the state 5 million people have voted

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

55-45 split of NPAs looks like this:

Dems: 2,359,322 (50.7%)
Reps: 2,294,284 (49.3%)
Total: 4,653,606

This is with 4 days left of early voting and assuming uniform ticket voting (ie both candidates get 100% of their own vote or swap the same percentage). I also think the NPA split will be closer to 60-40 to be honest. Democrats are likely going into election day with a 3-4 lead.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,874
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #445 on: November 03, 2016, 05:16:49 PM »

Ralston says that Cresent Hardy (R in NV-4) and Danny Tarkanian (R in NV-3) are just about goners
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #446 on: November 03, 2016, 05:18:16 PM »

Florida - C+5 or more. It's going to be called early. Even if you assume both Trump and HRC are getting 90% of their respective votes each, NPAs break towards democratic candidates by 10-20% in FL. There are also significantly more NPAs this cycle.

If Democrats go into election day with a voter reg turnout advantage of 2-3 points, she may be approach 7-10 point territory depending on turnout on election day.

Well, the latest Upshot said they found lots of White Democrats disaffecting to Trump... So if that is true, it will be tight.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #447 on: November 03, 2016, 05:21:01 PM »



Early vote excels in Democratic counties
http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/11/02/early-vote-excels-democratic-counties/93140708/
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,831


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #448 on: November 03, 2016, 05:23:16 PM »


Buhhhh I was told that WI would go for Trump because working white class whites!!!!
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #449 on: November 03, 2016, 05:24:53 PM »

fun thing is that WI seems atm not only more secure but also more energized than MI/PA.....but i concede, that's not a fair comparison since WI has early voting.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 ... 78  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 12 queries.