absentee/early vote thread, part 2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 08:01:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  absentee/early vote thread, part 2
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 ... 78
Author Topic: absentee/early vote thread, part 2  (Read 111614 times)
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1375 on: November 06, 2016, 11:06:00 AM »

BTW, I don't get why everyone is so excited about racial breakdown in FL and NC.

Even right now the electorate is about the same as 2012 total in FL and NC. But we know (if polls are right) that Trump will be doing much better on the Election Day, which sort of implies that ED electorate will be much whiter& probably males. So the total electorate will be also slightly whiter, but probably more female that 2012.

Or? Huh
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1376 on: November 06, 2016, 11:07:01 AM »

BTW, I don't get why everyone is so excited about racial breakdown in FL and NC.

Even right now the electorate is about the same as 2012 total in FL and NC. But we know (if polls are right) that Trump will be doing much better on the Election Day, which sort of implies that ED electorate will be much whiter& probably males. So the total electorate will be also slightly whiter, but probably more female that 2012.

Or? Huh

That's not how it works. Also, the final Hispanic share of the electorate will absolutely be larger this year.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1377 on: November 06, 2016, 11:08:37 AM »

As of 11:00 AM, 13,149 voters in Broward County have voted. We could be headed for a massive Sunday there

Wow.......!
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1378 on: November 06, 2016, 11:09:15 AM »

YouGov said among the 63% in FL that voted, it's 51-41 lead for Hillary. That lead may slightly expand after today.

Trump would have to crush her on Tuesday to overcome that.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,120
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1379 on: November 06, 2016, 11:11:18 AM »

YouGov said among the 63% in FL that voted, it's 51-41 lead for Hillary. That lead may slightly expand after today.

Trump would have to crush her on Tuesday to overcome that.
And this is what's terrifying for Trump: He's got not GOTV and working class White turnout isn't exactly stellar as it stands.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1380 on: November 06, 2016, 11:13:24 AM »

BTW, I don't get why everyone is so excited about racial breakdown in FL and NC.

Even right now the electorate is about the same as 2012 total in FL and NC. But we know (if polls are right) that Trump will be doing much better on the Election Day, which sort of implies that ED electorate will be much whiter& probably males. So the total electorate will be also slightly whiter, but probably more female that 2012.

Or? Huh

That's not how it works. Also, the final Hispanic share of the electorate will absolutely be larger this year.
So how does it work, if polls are right?
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1381 on: November 06, 2016, 11:16:11 AM »

as i said...won't make any NC/FL projections....too volatile and too.many unknown factors.
Logged
Absolution9
Rookie
**
Posts: 172


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1382 on: November 06, 2016, 11:17:37 AM »

YouGov said among the 63% in FL that voted, it's 51-41 lead for Hillary. That lead may slightly expand after today.

Trump would have to crush her on Tuesday to overcome that.

8% third party???
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1383 on: November 06, 2016, 11:19:20 AM »

High turnout doesn't necessarily mean it's all good for Hillary/Dems.

An analysis of the Austrian Presidential election found that VdB (the leftist candidate) did very well in high turnout districts, but also Hofer (the far-right candidate): In fact, there were some districts with 80%+ turnout which voted with 60%+ for VdB, but also 80%+ turnout districts which voted with 60%+ for Hofer ...

Also remember that Trump did rather well in the high turnout primaries.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1384 on: November 06, 2016, 11:20:00 AM »

High turnout doesn't necessarily mean it's all good for Hillary/Dems.

An analysis of the Austrian Presidential election found that VdB (leftist candidate) did very well in high turnout districts, but also Hofer (the far-right candidate): In fact, there were some districts with 80%+ turnout which voted with 60%+ for VdB, but also 80%+ turnout districts which voted with 60%+ for Hofer ...

Also remember that Trump did rather well in the high turnout primaries.

Austria =! U.S.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1385 on: November 06, 2016, 11:21:01 AM »
« Edited: November 06, 2016, 11:24:19 AM by Little Big BREXIT »

BTW, about Dixiecrats.

If this site is right, so we have following stats: https://electionbettingodds.com/earlyvoting.html


So increase of Reps in NC and FL is much lower than decrease of Dems. So it is not only about Dixiecrats.

And I doubt that "new" UFA:s will vote more democratic that "gone" Dems. No?

Specially when we know, that Blacks (90% for Hillary) has decreased their share.



Hillary =! Obama
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1386 on: November 06, 2016, 11:21:23 AM »

if the general turnout is high, big cities are favored.

brexit was low turnout in remain-areas as everyone knows.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,120
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1387 on: November 06, 2016, 11:21:37 AM »

High turnout doesn't necessarily mean it's all good for Hillary/Dems.

An analysis of the Austrian Presidential election found that VdB (the leftist candidate) did very well in high turnout districts, but also Hofer (the far-right candidate): In fact, there were some districts with 80%+ turnout which voted with 60%+ for VdB, but also 80%+ turnout districts which voted with 60%+ for Hofer ...

Also remember that Trump did rather well in the high turnout primaries.
Please stop comparing the US to Austria.

I hate it when people try to compare America to Denmark, I don't like the reverse either.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1388 on: November 06, 2016, 11:22:42 AM »

High turnout doesn't necessarily mean it's all good for Hillary/Dems.

An analysis of the Austrian Presidential election found that VdB (leftist candidate) did very well in high turnout districts, but also Hofer (the far-right candidate): In fact, there were some districts with 80%+ turnout which voted with 60%+ for VdB, but also 80%+ turnout districts which voted with 60%+ for Hofer ...

Also remember that Trump did rather well in the high turnout primaries.

Austria =! U.S.

Obviously. Yes.

But it could mirror the Austrian Presidential election this time, just on a 40x bigger scale.

Also the candidates are roughly comparable (VdB more so with Hillary, just without her email scandal and secrecy issues and Hofer being way more likeable than asshole Trump).
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1389 on: November 06, 2016, 11:23:20 AM »

High turnout doesn't necessarily mean it's all good for Hillary/Dems.

An analysis of the Austrian Presidential election found that VdB (leftist candidate) did very well in high turnout districts, but also Hofer (the far-right candidate): In fact, there were some districts with 80%+ turnout which voted with 60%+ for VdB, but also 80%+ turnout districts which voted with 60%+ for Hofer ...

Also remember that Trump did rather well in the high turnout primaries.

Austria =! U.S.

Obviously. Yes.

But it could mirror the Austrian Presidential election this time, just on a 40x bigger scale.

Also the candidates are roughly comparable (VdB more so with Hillary, just without her email scandal and secrecy issues and Hofer being way more likeable than asshole Trump).

This post shows a serious lack of understanding of different political landscapes.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1390 on: November 06, 2016, 11:24:48 AM »

Also the candidates are roughly comparable

Hillary Clinton is a major party candidate; Austria's major parties have been eclipsed by splinter groups. No comparison.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,635


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1391 on: November 06, 2016, 11:26:01 AM »

YouGov said among the 63% in FL that voted, it's 51-41 lead for Hillary. That lead may slightly expand after today.

Trump would have to crush her on Tuesday to overcome that.

8% third party???

May include those who refused to say who they voted for.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1392 on: November 06, 2016, 11:26:13 AM »

tender has a point even while he makes it in a really unconvincing way, imho.

less about austria than about countries feeling the wave of new big-gov right-wing-populism, killing the old conservative parties.

even while i would suggest, demographics and economy of the US makes it more robust against crypto-fascism than europe.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1393 on: November 06, 2016, 11:26:39 AM »

There's also another similarity between the Austrian and the coming US election that you cannot deny:

Hofer (who's actually the far-right candidate) did very well in rural, formerly heavy industrial/mining Social-Democratic voting areas. Much like Trump does in former heavily Democratic-voting states, such as WV/KY/TN/AR and the likes.

VdB on the other hand won some rural areas that voted heavily Conservative in the 1980s, much like some US conservatives are now abandoning Trump in states like UT, VA, CO etc.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,120
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1394 on: November 06, 2016, 11:28:27 AM »

There's also another similarity between the Austrian and the coming US election that you cannot deny:

Hofer (who's actually the far-right candidate) did very well in rural, formerly heavy industrial/mining Social-Democratic voting areas. Much like Trump does in former heavily Democratic-voting states, such as WV/KY/TN/AR and the likes.

VdB on the other hand won some rural areas that voted heavily Conservative in the 1980s, much like some US conservatives are now abandoning Trump in states like UT, VA, CO etc.
This trend has been going on for over 20 years and isn't exactly new or recent.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1395 on: November 06, 2016, 11:28:47 AM »

YouGov said among the 63% in FL that voted, it's 51-41 lead for Hillary. That lead may slightly expand after today.

Trump would have to crush her on Tuesday to overcome that.

8% third party???

May include those who refused to say who they voted for.

What's weird in a lot of these early vote polls is that they are implying huge third party numbers, way more than I expected.  Does it make sense to you that 8% of early voters in Florida are casting third party ballots?  I would have thought that almost all third party votes would be election day ones and that there would be way less than 8%.  This isn't the first poll that has shown this.

I don't think the missing 8% is all 3rd party vote-- what I've noticed while compiling all the early voting poll results is that very often a few percent won't say who they voted for (listed as "unsure", "none", etc.)

Now why these early voting non-respondents are still kept in the poll instead of being thrown out, I have no idea...
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1396 on: November 06, 2016, 11:29:13 AM »

final post on that matter....if austria is a sign, HRC would kill it in CO/NC/GA.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1397 on: November 06, 2016, 11:30:39 AM »

tender has a point even while he makes it in a really unconvincing way, imho.

less about austria than about countries feeling the wave of new big-gov right-wing-populism, killing the old conservative parties.

even while i would suggest, demographics and economy of the US makes it more robust against crypto-fascism than europe.

There is certainly an analogy between the Trump phenomenon and right-wing politics all over Europe. It is a powerful force.

But each election has two sides, and there is no comparison between a Democratic candidate with a reasonably united and very strong campaign apparatus and a Green Party gadfly who mainly benefited from being a vessel for anti-fascist votes. Whatever your personal view of Hillary Clinton—and Tender has not been shy in expressing his disgust—she is a strong candidate among a large share of the Democratic coalition.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1398 on: November 06, 2016, 11:32:06 AM »
« Edited: November 06, 2016, 11:38:11 AM by Tender Branson »

final post on that matter....if austria is a sign, HRC would kill it in CO/NC/GA.

(--- almost the final post ---)

Why ?

Vorarlberg = UT

Tyrol = CO

But what is NC and GA ?

Upper Austria or Lower Austria. Hard to tell. Or: if Austria is any sign then it's that Trump and Hillary will split the major battleground states in an overall very tight election. Hofer won the battleground state of Lower Austria, while VdB won the battleground state of Upper Austria (which always votes extremely close to Austria as a whole).
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1399 on: November 06, 2016, 11:41:09 AM »

The final puzzle in the Austria vs. US comparison will be the early vote vs. election day vote:

Like in Austria, the early vote in the US is heavily Dem/left (almost identical according to polls: 60-65%) - and the election day vote was heavily Hofer (52-48).

It remains to be seen if Trump can mobilize as much as Hofer did with the election day folk.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 ... 78  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.076 seconds with 12 queries.