absentee/early vote thread, part 2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:17:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  absentee/early vote thread, part 2 (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
Author Topic: absentee/early vote thread, part 2  (Read 112371 times)
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« on: November 02, 2016, 10:23:55 AM »

I really don't think black turnout will be anywhere near the levels of 2008/2012 with Obama not on the ballot. An old white woman just isn't going to get them out like Obama.

I expect Hispanics will be higher given the things Trump has said about them.

btw....AAs are voting at normal levels, not low ones.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2016, 10:56:22 AM »

A tweetstorm by Nick Riccardi on the nature of the D advantage in CO starts here:

https://twitter.com/NickRiccardi/status/793840263089180672
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2016, 12:27:05 PM »

Ye old bait-and-switch post by Michael McDonald: all is well in CO so far.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2016, 01:09:29 PM »


http://www.latinodecisions.com/files/8714/7689/5921/NALEO_Latino_Battleground_States_Toplines.pdf

63 - 23 Clinton, but with a relatively long time in the field.

I suppose you can pick whichever in this case, but LD has been pretty accurate in the past and the TargetSmart poll would lend credence to this defection.


Reading these posts online here of all liberals you would think trump was down with hispanics by 40-50% in FLorida, not the case obviously.

I'd say there is plenty of evidence to support both conclusions. You can assert that "no way he's down by 40 with FL latinos" if you want, but you are by no means on solid ground when you say that, and you should at least acknowledge that.
LD overestimated Obama's margin both times IIRC. (Not 100% sure)

TargetSmart, well... Smiley

Looks like they were a little bit Obama-friendly in '12. Couldn't find '08, though I didn't look hard.

LD 2012 final proj: 75-23
2012 Exit poll final: 71-27
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2016, 08:34:35 PM »


That's what I wanna hear. Make NH+ME-02 disappear from the math.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2016, 08:57:26 PM »

Repubs win Washoe again by almost 500 (remember, R's outvoted D's in Washoe in Week 2 of early voting in 2012).

GOP: 3,940
DEM: 3,459

Clark looks very good today so far so the Clark firewall will get bigger

Why are the republicans winning Washoe?

Rs usually win Washoe. They won Washoe in 2012 when Obama easily won NV. Frankly, the fact that Rs aren't already ahead there should bother them greatly.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2016, 09:06:43 PM »

Repubs win Washoe again by almost 500 (remember, R's outvoted D's in Washoe in Week 2 of early voting in 2012).

GOP: 3,940
DEM: 3,459

Clark looks very good today so far so the Clark firewall will get bigger

Why are the republicans winning Washoe?

Rs usually win Washoe. They won Washoe in 2012 when Obama easily won NV. Frankly, the fact that Rs aren't already ahead there should bother them greatly.

Obama won Washoe in 2012 by almost 4%. I can see Clinton winning it by a modest 5% this year, with Clark going bigger for Clinton this year than in 2012, when Obama won it by about 15%. Washoe has a Republican registration advantage but it's becoming more Democrat. Ultimately, it's all up to turnout (but even more ultimately, the state is really decided by Clark county).

Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant in the early vote. Rs won the early vote by 500 votes in 2012. If Dems even break even in Washoe EV, Nevada's way over (which we already know from Clark).
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2016, 09:12:56 PM »

@steveschale  57s58 seconds ago

Let's look at the Orange numbers another way.

Dem + NPA = 72% of today's votes.

And among NPA reg voters in Orange, 58% are non-white.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2016, 09:15:29 PM »

Not sure how one comes to be worried about CO. EVs (which are....real votes) look absolutely fantastic and make up almost all votes in CO and no poll has shown a number like that ever in CO, either. How does one argue for worry?
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2016, 09:24:38 PM »

didn't want to debate that at length...but the pollster has been ciruli associates ...afaik an A pollster on 538.

When the internal numbers have obvious problems AND you're an outlier, Nate giving you an A doesn't mean everything you publish must be right.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2016, 09:29:18 PM »

Schale thought this day was likely....but you could tell he was getting nervous. He will (and should) stay nervous to see it keep happening, but you can tell he's a happy man tonight.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2016, 09:41:13 PM »

Schale is spending his night posting .gifs of Joe Biden after days of shouting about voting in all caps. He likes tonight a whole lot.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2016, 09:45:39 PM »

Is Florida close to as good for Clinton as Nevada is with this surge of democratic support?

I certainly don't see it like that. NV is really close to literally over. This seems to be the kind of day that helps FL feel solidly lean-y. It's a big movement, but I at least still think there's a big gulf in odds between the two.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2016, 09:49:07 PM »

Is Florida close to as good for Clinton as Nevada is with this surge of democratic support?

yeah, because one guy is having an erection on twitter, florida is good as gone. you people are amazing.

>one person asks a legit question, gets an immediate, reasonable answer in the negative

>"YOOOUUU PPPEEEOOOPPPLEEEEEE"

Yeah okay bud. Take aspirin, your heart's gonna explode.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2016, 09:50:13 PM »

Is Florida close to as good for Clinton as Nevada is with this surge of democratic support?

I certainly don't see it like that. NV is really close to literally over. This seems to be the kind of day that helps FL feel solidly lean-y. It's a big movement, but I at least still think there's a big gulf in odds between the two.

No, it shows that the Mook machine actually works. He saved her bacon in 2008 in the Nevada caucus and Ohio primary; he saved her again this year in the Iowa caucus and Nevada caucus..the guy knows how to organize.

In no way am I saying FL wont' end up in her column, or even that it won't look very very very good by the end of the week. But it's wrong, it's factually and plainly wrong, to say that evidence points to NV and FL looking equally likely.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2016, 09:57:02 PM »

Florida is a much bigger state than Nevada, so it can't be as accurately gauged by a Jon Ralston-type figure. There's only one Jon Ralston.

You're completely right, of course, but quickly shifting political ID and a much closer race in-state also make FL way harder to call than NV, where the polls and EV have never been that close.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2016, 10:22:39 PM »

Wow, just.......wow!
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2016, 10:29:09 PM »


If Clinton can outdo Trump and turn more than 15 of those into real votes, that's great indeed.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #18 on: November 02, 2016, 10:50:24 PM »


Does anybody have a rough estimate of what that translates to in raw votes?

I don't, but Steve sure does!

@steveschale  14m14 minutes ago


@ElectProject about 612K Hispanics through Tue, 143K with no previous voting history. 290K with 0 or 1 of 3 history.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #19 on: November 02, 2016, 10:58:40 PM »


I don't follow a reporter that covers it close. The SoS will put the #s up here:

http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/earlyvoting/index.shtml

But they don't have today's yet, apparently.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2016, 12:06:36 AM »

And we already knew this, but Nate Cohn is impressed with early indications in NC. In the immortal words of Ice Cube, today was a goooooood day.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/794042342646943744
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2016, 12:15:49 AM »

GOP not as lucky as the Cubs today in Clark:
Total Clark: 36,041
Ds: 15,959 44%
Rs: 11,202 31%
Dems add almost 4,800.

https://twitter.com/Franciscoj_NV/status/794041357832749056

Fantastic! Cheesy

How does that compare to same day in 2012?

D ~+1,000 (i.e., was 4,000 in 2012)

https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/794041861258166272
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2016, 12:26:30 AM »

GOP not as lucky as the Cubs today in Clark:
Total Clark: 36,041
Ds: 15,959 44%
Rs: 11,202 31%
Dems add almost 4,800.


Fantastic! Cheesy

How does that compare to same day in 2012?

D ~+1,000 (i.e., was 4,000 in 2012)

[/quote]

Probably not wrong to contextualize a bit, tho, since HRC was in Vegas at Culinary Union doing a speech/GOTV today. Doesn't negate the numbers, but if that doesn't bring you a good day, well, it's a bad day.

Does sound like the NV insiders feel like things are feeling pretty 2012-ish.
[/quote]

You're right to point that out. The fact that Trump's rally yielded basically no change at all, however, does give some sense of GOTV differences (differences which are likely to keep playing out this week).
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2016, 12:35:42 AM »

The early vote numbers in North Carolina have been insane the last day or two. So much for African Americans not voting.

Do we have numbers or, even better, graphs? Smiley

Yup

http://www.oldnorthstatepolitics.com/?m=0

From these graphs, it doesn't look like AA turnout is getting any better. Sad

The most recent post on that blog is actually from this morning. Today's numbers aren't in yet, so the big day isn't in this, I don't think.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2016, 12:37:39 AM »

The early vote numbers in North Carolina have been insane the last day or two. So much for African Americans not voting.

Do we have numbers or, even better, graphs? Smiley

Yup

http://www.oldnorthstatepolitics.com/?m=0

From these graphs, it doesn't look like AA turnout is getting any better. Sad

The most recent post on that blog is actually from this morning. Today's numbers aren't in yet, so the big day isn't in this, I don't think.

Oh, good to know. I'm holding out hope!

Given the Guilford #s and Nate Cohn's hint that the early #s he saw from today were very good, we should definitely see something noticeable. But, of course, good to wait for the charts.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 12 queries.