Susquehanna - PA: Clinton +2 (4-way)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:27:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Susquehanna - PA: Clinton +2 (4-way)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Susquehanna - PA: Clinton +2 (4-way)  (Read 3475 times)
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 02, 2016, 11:16:44 AM »

Among 681 LVs, Oct. 31-Nov. 1:

Clinton 45 (+1 from early Oct)
Trump 43 (+3)
Johnson 2 (-2)
Stein 2 (nc)

https://mgtvwhtm.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/toplines-statewideabc272-oct16.pdf
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2016, 11:18:37 AM »

At OCT. 4-9, they had Clinton+4 Smiley
Logged
Mike88
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,289
Portugal


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2016, 11:19:17 AM »

Hmm... They had Obama losing in 2012... So this is good news! Cheesy
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,634
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2016, 11:19:26 AM »

Their final result in 2012 was Romney 49-45, so they aren't reliable. Trump is likely to win PA though.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,120
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2016, 11:19:54 AM »

Their final result in 2012 was Romney 49-45, so they aren't reliable. Trump is likely to win PA though.
Lol
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2016, 11:20:00 AM »


Which was a very good polling time for her, so only a 2 point drop from then isn't too bad.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2016, 11:20:14 AM »

Their final result in 2012 was Romney 49-45, so they aren't reliable. Trump is likely to win PA though.
Lol

His act is getting stale.
Logged
TC 25
Rookie
**
Posts: 236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2016, 11:20:17 AM »

Going down to the wire in PA.  Michigan too.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2016, 11:20:25 AM »

Hmm... They had Obama losing in 2012... So this is good news! Cheesy
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2016, 11:20:56 AM »


Hmm... They had Obama losing in 2012... So this is good news! Cheesy

So yeah.
Logged
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2016, 11:21:11 AM »

I'm going to wait and see what Q comes out with
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2016, 11:21:19 AM »

Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2016, 11:22:36 AM »

I'm going to wait and see what Q comes out with

Not a bad call. Biggest issue I see with this one is the undecideds. For a state like PA, 45 is quite low for the leader. They've never shown the same lead for C that others have, either. Also, both candidates actually gained in this poll. Tough to say what to take away from this one.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2016, 11:23:31 AM »

Going down to the wire in PA.  Michigan too.

Yeah, if you cherrypick.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2016, 11:24:53 AM »

Their final result in 2012 was Romney 49-45, so they aren't reliable. Trump is likely to win PA though.
Lol

His act is getting stale.

>Implying it was ever funny
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2016, 11:25:49 AM »


Oh, it is not.

He is a cheap version of Beet.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2016, 11:28:05 AM »

Susquehanna had Romney by 4... Obama won by 5... do a little maths and Clinton wins by 11.

HEY!  Just as I predicted!  GREAT!
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,634
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2016, 11:31:20 AM »


Oh, it is not.

He is a cheap version of Beet.

I have always said I felt Trump would win, and have stated my reasons several times. I got caught up in the optimism during Hillary's highs, but at the same time always stated clearly that her failure to hit 50% in the key states was concerning. I have no "act". My posts have always been consistent.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,948


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 02, 2016, 11:39:29 AM »

Their final result in 2012 was Romney 49-45, so they aren't reliable. Trump is likely to win PA though.

Interesting. Do you think NJ might be in play for the Trumpster given some overflow of his strength in the Keystone State?
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 02, 2016, 12:23:45 PM »

Clinton holds steady while Trump gains.  I think I'm seeing a pattern here.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,624


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2016, 12:24:32 PM »

Their final result in 2012 was Romney 49-45, so they aren't reliable. Trump is likely to win PA though.

Interesting. Do you think NJ might be in play for the Trumpster given some overflow of his strength in the Keystone State?

Nominee for (unintentionally?) funniest post of the week.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2016, 12:38:51 PM »

Their final PA poll in 2012 was a tie in the presidential race and Casey up 1 point, lol. They're also a notorious GOP hack pollster. Trash it.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,449
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 02, 2016, 02:42:01 PM »


Oh, it is not.
He is a cheap version of Beet.

I have always said I felt Trump would win, and have stated my reasons several times. I got caught up in the optimism during Hillary's highs, but at the same time always stated clearly that her failure to hit 50% in the key states was concerning. I have no "act". My posts have always been consistent.

"Consistent" trash ... we agree with you.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 02, 2016, 03:51:51 PM »

Their final result in 2012 was Romney 49-45, so they aren't reliable. Trump is likely to win PA though.

I refer to them as Suxquehanna.  They have had a terrible track record in PA.

I'd pay more attention to the Franklin and Marshall poll, but I'd like to see them poll this weekend. 
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,634
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 02, 2016, 03:53:07 PM »


Oh, it is not.
He is a cheap version of Beet.

I have always said I felt Trump would win, and have stated my reasons several times. I got caught up in the optimism during Hillary's highs, but at the same time always stated clearly that her failure to hit 50% in the key states was concerning. I have no "act". My posts have always been consistent.

"Consistent" trash ... we agree with you.

I could care less about being called trash, just sick of being called a troll.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 13 queries.