Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2017, 10:45:25 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2016 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
| | |-+  PA-Monmouth: McGinty +3
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: PA-Monmouth: McGinty +3  (Read 616 times)
Castro
Castro2020
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9087
United States


View Profile
« on: November 02, 2016, 12:31:35 pm »
Ignore

McGinty - 47%
Toomey - 44%
Clifford - 3%

https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_PA_110216/
Logged
swf541
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 749


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2016, 12:33:24 pm »
Ignore

Toomey is finished atm, this is probably Dems 2nd likeliest gain (I still think Feingold will win)
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14248


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2016, 01:16:42 pm »

Logged
xīngkěruž
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10622
Taiwan


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2016, 01:20:59 pm »
Ignore

Like Wisconsin, this won't be a blowout, but it's hard to see Toomey recovering this late in the game.
Logged

Dwarven Dragon
Wulfric
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13552
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2016, 01:23:15 pm »
Ignore

Toomey is finished atm, this is probably Dems 2nd likeliest gain (I still think Feingold will win)


Don't you mean third likeliest? (Don't forget IL)
Logged

Statement on MT Result: http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=254607.msg5668993#msg5668993

----

ALL GA-6 RESIDENTS ARE DUTY AND HONOR BOUND TO VOTE FOR JON OSSOFF IN THE JUNE 20 RUNOFF!

---
'17 Gov. Ratings: https://tinyurl.com/h35xfkr (4/12: VA - Toss-Up to Lean D)
'18 House Rating: Lean R
swf541
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 749


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2016, 01:38:32 pm »
Ignore

Toomey is finished atm, this is probably Dems 2nd likeliest gain (I still think Feingold will win)


Don't you mean third likeliest? (Don't forget IL)

No i think this is higher than WI so IL, PA then WI.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13624
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2016, 02:22:40 pm »
Ignore

WI is definitely more competitive than PA.
Logged



xīngkěruž
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10622
Taiwan


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2016, 02:26:52 pm »
Ignore

WI is definitely more competitive than PA.

It's really not. I'll buy what you said about it being as competitive as Florida, by this point.
Logged

Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3001
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2016, 04:02:49 pm »
Ignore

WI is definitely more competitive than PA.

It's really not. I'll buy what you said about it being as competitive as Florida, by this point.

Take the best, Clinton fans are almost 100% wrong every single time, every poll which is not favorable is bad, an outlier, has a bad polling agency or will be beaten magically in election day!
Logged



Joshua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1330
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2016, 01:06:44 am »
Ignore

WI is definitely more competitive than PA.

It's really not. I'll buy what you said about it being as competitive as Florida, by this point.

Take the best, Clinton fans are almost 100% wrong every single time, every poll which is not favorable is bad, an outlier, has a bad polling agency or will be beaten magically in election day!

You were literally wrong about Sanders in every primary contest.
Logged
xīngkěruž
xingkerui
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10622
Taiwan


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 03, 2016, 01:21:36 am »
Ignore

WI is definitely more competitive than PA.

It's really not. I'll buy what you said about it being as competitive as Florida, by this point.

Take the best, Clinton fans are almost 100% wrong every single time, every poll which is not favorable is bad, an outlier, has a bad polling agency or will be beaten magically in election day!

Thanks for your logical and unbiased #analysis.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines