MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:49:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5  (Read 25758 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,196
United States


« on: November 05, 2016, 12:01:07 AM »

NV and WI should be safe for the Dems. PA is closer, but McGinty looks to be in good shape. Those MO/NC numbers are a bit more disappointing, but if Clinton wins NC by enough, she could pull Ross over the top.

Yes, it is time to give up on MO and NC Senate, they are clearly unwinnable due to emails, right?

[/atlas over reacting]

No don't be silly. It Won't be because of emails, NC is likely lost because of dog whistling in that one ad Burr threw out.

And MO was always gonna be crazy, same way CO 2014 was Dem in the bag even with Udall's floundering until turnout happened.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,196
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2017, 12:42:15 AM »

In retrospect, I wonder if Kay Hagan should've just tried again.



Blunt and Masto were mostly correct, and Burr was still within the MOE.


Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.