Bernie Sanders not ruling out 2020 run
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 06:09:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Bernie Sanders not ruling out 2020 run
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Bernie Sanders not ruling out 2020 run  (Read 1798 times)
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 10, 2016, 02:43:10 PM »

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/796790661659951104 He figures why not?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2016, 02:46:53 PM »

He'll be like 79, right?

I know there are more older candidates nowdays (this particular time, Trump is 70, Hillary 69), but 79 seems just too old.
Logged
Mike88
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,282
Portugal


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2016, 02:47:34 PM »

Nah... He will be too old.

I think Warren is now the "de facto" leader of the Democratic Party and clear frontrunner for 2020 in the Dem side.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2016, 02:53:07 PM »

if he's in good health, sure.
Logged
swf541
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2016, 02:55:49 PM »

Logged
Downnice
Rookie
**
Posts: 100
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.64, S: -7.86

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2016, 02:56:10 PM »

Age is the main concern but IF he is healthy enough to do it, then he will probably be the nominee and is their best chance of winning back the rust belt
Logged
No War, but the War on Christmas
iBizzBee
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,826

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2016, 02:58:04 PM »

I love Bernie and everything he stood for; but he'll not only be too old, but also too tied to Hillary with how hard he campaigned for her. The Democratic party needs new, fresh candidates. Certainly he should continue to be a leader in the party and for Progressive ideas, but I don't see him running again.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2016, 03:12:12 PM »

Age is the main concern but IF he is healthy enough to do it, then he will probably be the nominee and is their best chance of winning back the rust belt

Especially if Trump fails to live up to the more left leaning populism that he ran on.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2016, 03:16:19 PM »

There's zero reason for him to rule it out completely right now.

I think it's highly unlikely he'll pull the trigger when the time comes though, his age by then being the main reason why he wouldn't.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2016, 03:19:00 PM »

Age really is an issue with this.
Logged
GoTfan
GoTfan21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,646
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2016, 03:24:04 PM »

Hey, as Robert Reich said, age isn't the issue. FDR was paralysed, and JFK had Addison's and Crohn's diseases, but they were still good Presidents. Regardless, he seems to be in decent health.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,731
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2016, 03:29:15 PM »

Age is not an issue to us, but it will be to the kind of people you all naïvely think he'd be able to win over.

And also, f-ck anyone who thinks being too tied to Hillary Clinton would be a problem. She's not a toxic waste heap. Roll Eyes She just didn't make the right appeals to the right people.
Logged
GoTfan
GoTfan21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,646
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2016, 03:31:32 PM »

Age is not an issue to us, but it will be to the kind of people you all naïvely think he'd be able to win over.

And also, f-ck anyone who thinks being too tied to Hillary Clinton would be a problem. She's not a toxic waste heap. Roll Eyes She just didn't make the right appeals to the right people.

Problem is, those tied to Hillary (Kaine especially) will be stuck with a loser image in 2020. It's like Quayle in 2000. He was stuck with the same image and didn't even make it into Iowa.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,731
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2016, 03:34:02 PM »

Campaigning for the nominee of your de-facto party is not a death kiss.
Logged
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,956
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 10, 2016, 03:34:31 PM »

I doubt he'll actually run, especially considering his age the time. But it's undeniable he'll play a critical role in the nomination process as candidates vie for his endorsement. At this moment, Sanders and Warren are the unofficial leaders of the Democratic Party and are in the best position to restructure it in the direction it needs to go - which is away from the technocratic, third way politics of Clinton, Obama, Kaine, Booker, et al.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,852


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 10, 2016, 03:45:13 PM »

There's no time to waste!

He needs to run down to the South and campaign at black churches for the next 4 years starting today!
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 10, 2016, 03:47:37 PM »

And also, f-ck anyone who thinks being too tied to Hillary Clinton would be a problem. She's not a toxic waste heap. Roll Eyes She just didn't make the right appeals to the right people.

I certainly can't see "too close to Hillary" as an actual "issue" in 2020. If only it's because she's unlikely to be on frontline politics.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 10, 2016, 03:51:35 PM »

Campaigning for the nominee of your de-facto party is not a death kiss.

He'd be finished with the party if he hadn't endorsed Hillary, much less campaign for her.

That's why I'm convinced Kasich would be finished even if Trump lost.
Logged
BlueSwan
blueswan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,339
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 10, 2016, 03:52:35 PM »

Nah... He will be too old.

I think Warren is now the "de facto" leader of the Democratic Party and clear frontrunner for 2020 in the Dem side.
Warren will be 71 years old by the 2020 election.

I'm no ageist, but I really think the dems are in dire need of some charismatic young(er) leaders.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,852


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 10, 2016, 04:03:34 PM »

Warren will be 71 years old by the 2020 election.

I'm no ageist, but I really think the dems are in dire need of some charismatic young(er) leaders.

Our bench is depleted.

We won't be able to rebuild in time for 2020.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 10, 2016, 04:05:18 PM »

If he's healthy enough and picks a good running mate just in case he could easily run. Age shouldn't preclude you from the presidency unless you're literally on death's door or picked an awful VP.
Logged
Blackacre
Spenstar3D
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,172
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -7.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 10, 2016, 04:10:19 PM »

I'd say Chris Murphy, but... after the 2016 embarrassment, a New England Senator not named Bernie or Warren whose big thing is gun control isn't going to cut it. Warren/Bernie get a pass because their progressive populist rhetotic is our best chance to win back working-class white voters and inspire young turnout.

We'd have to pull from the Senate because we don't have any Governors to pull from except PA's Tom Wolf. (and he'd have to survive 2018) We'll probably pick up some in 2018 but 2 years into 1 term does not a presidential candidate make. We have a lot of options from our Class 1 who might be able to do it if they survive 2018: Tammy Baldwin, Bob Casey, obviously Sanders and Warren, maaaaybe Murphy if he captures a similar rhetoric, and Sherrod Brown.

If Bernie's in good health 4 years from now, god bless him. He knows how to inspire, and even though I didn't vote for him in 2016, I sure as hell would vote for him in 2020 if he decided to run
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 10, 2016, 04:16:49 PM »

Not surprised... once you've run for president, especially with those crowds, that adoration, that he wouldn't rule out going back for another taste.

But it won't necessarily be the same. In 2015/16 he had the perfect foil... a perfect avatar of the "corrupt establishment" to contrast himself with and set up his revolution as against. History never repeats itself exactly the same.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,852


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 10, 2016, 04:18:57 PM »

I'd say Chris Murphy, but... after the 2016 embarrassment, a New England Senator not named Bernie or Warren whose big thing is gun control isn't going to cut it. Warren/Bernie get a pass because their progressive populist rhetotic is our best chance to win back working-class white voters and inspire young turnout.

We'd have to pull from the Senate because we don't have any Governors to pull from except PA's Tom Wolf. (and he'd have to survive 2018) We'll probably pick up some in 2018 but 2 years into 1 term does not a presidential candidate make. We have a lot of options from our Class 1 who might be able to do it if they survive 2018: Tammy Baldwin, Bob Casey, obviously Sanders and Warren, maaaaybe Murphy if he captures a similar rhetoric, and Sherrod Brown.

If Bernie's in good health 4 years from now, god bless him. He knows how to inspire, and even though I didn't vote for him in 2016, I sure as hell would vote for him in 2020 if he decided to run

What do you think about Maggie Hassan?

She would have 4 years of experience as governor and 4 years of experience as Senator.

She would be 62 in 2020.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 10, 2016, 04:20:10 PM »
« Edited: November 10, 2016, 04:25:21 PM by Shah of Bratpuhr »

The bench doesn't seem too wide right now (especially when we're talking about younger politicians), but we can't rule out somebody rising rapidly like Obama in 2004. I mean, he went in four years from an obscure state Senator and congressional loser to President.

It ought to be noted most of Democratic presidential nominees in recent decades were hardly an obvious choice four years prior.

1976: Jimmy who?
1984: OK, Mondale was pretty likely one as former VP
1988: Dukakis was mentioned before, but never as a frontrunner
1992: Despite his ambitions were known, people expected many other to run and be stronger
2000: Incumbent VP, obvious one
2004: Kerry was lagging behind until Iowa
2008: Obama was just a state legislator 4 years prior

Republicans, due to frequently exhibiting "next-in-line" mentality were more predictable.

1968: Former Vice President
1980: A runner-up for the 1976 nomination
1988: Vice President and runner-up for the 1980 nomination
1996: Senate Majority Leader and a runner up for the 1988 nomination.
2000: Son of former President and Governor of a large state. An early favorite.
2008: A runner-up for the 2000 nomination
2014: A runner-up for the 2008 nomination

The streak was only broke now, with Trump
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 14 queries.