What killed the democrats in the white south? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:29:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  What killed the democrats in the white south? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What killed the democrats in the white south?  (Read 4975 times)
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,022
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« on: November 13, 2016, 10:13:36 PM »


Just took 'em four decades to realize it, right?

LOL, that was one your hottest takes yet, chief!
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,022
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2016, 01:18:32 PM »

Civil Rights Policies. It begun with Truman's desegregation in the armed forces and went on to the liberal agenda of JFK and LBJ. Especially the latter's civil rights legislation. Democrats however remained relatively strong at the state level until the 1990s, when several prominent southern Democrats switched party. Reagan's conservatism gave the rest.

This is literally an explanation I'd expect in a sixth-grader's history textbook.  Disgustingly simplistic.  Democrats didn't just start championing themselves as being pro-civil rights after 1964, ya know...

Anyway, the post above yours is accurate.  Even in Presidential elections, older Southerners were MUCH more Democratic than younger Southerners into the 2000s (when, ya know, those folks started to die, not switch parties).
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,022
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2016, 10:52:19 AM »

Generational replacement, the abortion issue as Dems unified as solidly pro-choice, guns, NAFTA, and cultural tension

Not as sure about this ... it's kind of like the civil rights issue: if they were mad that a Democratic President signed the bill into law (which is clear with civil rights and debatable at best for NAFTA), why would they then flock to the party that, in both cases, had a Congressional caucus almost unanimously in support of both pieces of legislation?  IN THE SOUTH, I would argue the Republican Party (post-CRA and post-Goldwater) was just as associated with civil rights - and later free trade - as the local Democratic Party was.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.