RI's 2016 Precinct Map Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:10:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Dereich)
  RI's 2016 Precinct Map Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Author Topic: RI's 2016 Precinct Map Thread  (Read 61259 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« on: November 13, 2016, 01:04:07 AM »
Rhode Island:


North Dakota:


Wyoming:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2016, 01:05:03 AM »
Montana:


Compare with Montana governor:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2016, 01:05:50 AM »
New Mexico:


Johnson strength in 2% increments:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2016, 01:06:29 AM »
Minnesota:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2016, 03:17:45 PM »
« Edited: November 14, 2016, 03:19:39 PM by realisticidealist »
Oklahoma:


Georgia:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2016, 01:55:57 PM »
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2016, 12:48:31 AM »
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2016, 01:34:00 PM »
Kentucky:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2016, 12:52:26 PM »
Nevada:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2016, 11:58:01 AM »
Arizona:


I will post PA and UT when I can get all their data together.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2016, 12:24:44 PM »
Washington (yellow = Johnson, purple = write-ins)
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2016, 02:08:42 PM »
Utah:


McMullin vote share (non-standard ramp):
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2016, 07:49:06 PM »
I will get to as many states as possible, but I can only do them as I can get the data. Most states haven't released anything yet.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2016, 12:32:35 PM »
Ohio:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2016, 09:55:00 PM »
Quote from: ottermax on December 02, 2016, 09:11:57 PM
Quote from: RINO Tom on December 02, 2016, 10:13:35 AM
I'm not very knowledgeable about WA, so two questions:

1) What is the geographic framework of the Seattle metro?  Are any of its outer suburbs Republican still or maybe a few inner precincts that are super White and wealthy or something?

2) What kind of folks/developments exist on those islands?  Are they "rural," or are they kind of a happenin' spot to live?

Thanks!

1) Overall the Seattle Metro swung quite strongly to Clinton especially in more inner / Eastside suburbs of King County. Traditionally the areas directly east of Seattle are lightly Republican or mixed, and as you see in the map it is heavily Democratic stretching out to the Cascades... In particular, the small, super-wealthy towns directly across from Seattle to the East - Medina, Hunts Point, Clyde Hill, Yarrow Point - voted for Clinton which might be a first...
However more working class (although not necessarily less diverse) suburbs to the Southeast and in Pierce County may have actually voted more for Trump although I would need to see a direct comparison. These areas have leaned Republican previously but occasionally present winnable races for Democrats locally. Not sure how that will look in the future. But nevertheless the swing in King County in wealthier areas was enough to offset these swings in SE suburbs.

2) The islands are definitely quite hippie and not heavily populated. Generally quite wealthy too these days with pretty high costs of living. Generally the only Republican area is the north part of Whidbey Island home to the Military Base.

I posted the swing map here. The strongest swings to Clinton were in a ring about Lake Sammamish plus Medina/Yarrow Point and Mercer Island, which are of course pretty wealthy areas.

I don't think "hippie" is the word I'd use to describe all the islands. Vashon and some of the San Juans (esp. Waldon) are that way, but north Whidbey and Camano certainly are not.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2016, 02:34:29 PM »
Iowa:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2016, 12:42:19 PM »
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2016, 08:54:31 PM »

I'll see what I can do.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2016, 09:56:19 PM »
Quote from: Bandit3 the Worker on December 09, 2016, 08:57:23 PM
Also, what about certain counties in Kentucky such as Campbell that aren't broken down by precinct? I can't possibly imagine Trump winning, say, Newport, but with our broken voting machines, you just never know.

AFAIK, Campbell County never bothered to release precinct results this time.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #19 on: December 12, 2016, 04:01:39 PM »
Connecticut:


Kansas:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #20 on: December 12, 2016, 05:23:46 PM »

I will map MA when they get around to releasing precinct results.

Quote from: Lothal1 on December 12, 2016, 05:01:48 PM
What is up with that one precinct in northwest Kansas that went for Clinton?

That's Nicodemus, KS. According to Wikipedia:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

As of the 2015 ACS, Nicodemus Township was still 62% Black.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #21 on: December 13, 2016, 02:55:27 PM »
Wisconsin, post-recount:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #22 on: December 14, 2016, 11:58:20 AM »
Tennessee:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #23 on: December 14, 2016, 03:24:01 PM »
Indiana and Missouri are two of the most difficult states to get data for. If I can map them, it likely won't be for a while.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #24 on: December 15, 2016, 12:15:38 PM »
Massachusetts:
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 13 queries.