How did Phil Scott win in Vermont?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 07:49:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  How did Phil Scott win in Vermont?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: How did Phil Scott win in Vermont?  (Read 2248 times)
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,033
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 13, 2016, 07:59:40 PM »

I thought this state was supposedly lost to the GOP?
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,594
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2016, 08:05:55 PM »

Who said that?  GOP Governors have always been competitive there.
Logged
NeverAgain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,659
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2016, 08:07:59 PM »

Who said that?  GOP Governors have always been competitive there.

Basically this, all the polls showed this as a close race. Plus Phil Scott is the exact scummy "moderate" Republican that NE Blue States want.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2016, 08:13:09 PM »

Who said that?  GOP Governors have always been competitive there.

Basically this, all the polls showed this as a close race. Plus Phil Scott is the exact scummy "moderate" Republican that NE Blue States want.

"Scummy"
Logged
Lothal1
Rookie
**
Posts: 228
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2016, 08:27:31 PM »

Single payer healthcare (same plan as Bernie) failed completely, causing tax increases and budget problems. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/single-payer-vermont-113711
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2016, 08:34:20 PM »

Who said that?  GOP Governors have always been competitive there.

Yeah, VT has a soft spot for moderate Republicans.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2016, 08:35:05 PM »

Single payer healthcare (same plan as Bernie) failed completely, causing tax increases and budget problems. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/single-payer-vermont-113711

Where do you come up with weird sh**?

Single Payer was never introduced in VT due to the huge taxes which had to be levied? When did VT face budget problems due to Single Payer? Do you make up this stuff just like that?
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2016, 09:06:22 PM »

Who said that?  GOP Governors have always been competitive there.

Yeah, VT has a soft spot for moderate Republicans.

Basically the whole Northeast does, unfortunately. A majority of Northeastern governors are Republican.
Logged
Lothal1
Rookie
**
Posts: 228
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2016, 09:08:14 PM »

Single payer healthcare (same plan as Bernie) failed completely, causing tax increases and budget problems. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/single-payer-vermont-113711

Where do you come up with weird sh**?

Single Payer was never introduced in VT due to the huge taxes which had to be levied? When did VT face budget problems due to Single Payer? Do you make up this stuff just like that?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Direct from Wikipedia. Literally look up Vermont single payer failure on google and it says all of these. Just remember that Bernie's plan was the exact same as the Vermont plan.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2016, 10:47:15 PM »

Worth noting Shumlin nearly lost here against a relative no-name in 2014. Republicans always compete in New England gubernatioral races, IIRC every state in New England has elected a Republican in the last 10 years.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2016, 10:59:54 PM »

Worth noting Shumlin nearly lost here against a relative no-name in 2014. Republicans always compete in New England gubernatioral races, IIRC every state in New England has elected a Republican in the last 10 years.
True:
RI and CT: Last in 2006
MA and ME: 2014
NH and VT: 2016
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2016, 11:07:50 PM »

Republicans do well when they run likable, moderate, substance-free campaigns. Especially when their predecessors are kind of unlikable, deeply ideological, and run the state with little regard for the feelings of others. Scott was the perfect contrast to Shumlin - and was exactly the kind of Republican that does well here.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2016, 11:08:46 PM »

Who said that?  GOP Governors have always been competitive there.

Yeah, VT has a soft spot for moderate Republicans.

Basically the whole Northeast does, unfortunately. A majority of Northeastern governors are Republican.

And that's - excellent. When these Republican governors are like Baker or Scott and not LePage. They represent reasonable check on "tax and spend" (and very frequently - very corrupt) Democratic legislatures. I hate one-party rule, and was both for Scott nd Baker. But in the South i am almost always for Democrats..
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2016, 11:12:03 PM »

Vermont's statewide politics have very little correlation to national political trends. They had Howard Dean through the 1990s, a popular Republican governor who was elected in 2002, re-elected in 2004, 2006, and 2008, then Shumlin was barely elected in 2010, re-elected in 2012, barely re-elected in 2014, and now Scott won by a decent margin.

Anyway, in this particular election, I think Minter's focus on gun control probably hurt her. You can probably win as a gun control supporting Democrat in Vermont, but not if it's your main issue. And Scott was a popular Lieutenant Governor so that probably helped. I'm guessing he'll easily win re-election in 2018 even if there's a Democratic megatsunami nationally, unless he does something really terrible that's specific to Vermont.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 13, 2016, 11:39:25 PM »

^Probably yes. And he is too experienced politician (Lt. Governor, and state Senator in the past) to do it...
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2016, 01:26:33 PM »

Who said that?  GOP Governors have always been competitive there.

Yeah, VT has a soft spot for moderate Republicans.

Basically the whole Northeast does, unfortunately. A majority of Northeastern governors are Republican.

And that's - excellent. When these Republican governors are like Baker or Scott and not LePage. They represent reasonable check on "tax and spend" (and very frequently - very corrupt) Democratic legislatures. I hate one-party rule, and was both for Scott nd Baker. But in the South i am almost always for Democrats..

Arkansan Democrats are pretty corrupt and usually pretty left wing for the state.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2016, 02:07:26 PM »

We've been throught this millions of times. New England Republicans are doing well in gubernatorial races. Remember Jim Douglas?
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2016, 02:40:28 PM »

He got more votes than his opponent lol
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2016, 03:33:22 PM »

Who said that?  GOP Governors have always been competitive there.

Yeah, VT has a soft spot for moderate Republicans.

Basically the whole Northeast does, unfortunately. A majority of Northeastern governors are Republican.

And that's - excellent. When these Republican governors are like Baker or Scott and not LePage. They represent reasonable check on "tax and spend" (and very frequently - very corrupt) Democratic legislatures. I hate one-party rule, and was both for Scott nd Baker. But in the South i am almost always for Democrats..

Arkansan Democrats are pretty corrupt and usually pretty left wing for the state.

And that's may be the reason they are in dire minority in the state. Even in early 2000th legislature in Arkansas was mostly Democratic and, generally,  moderate conservative, what more or less  corresponds to state tradition (which was manifested in US Congress by such people as McClellan and Gathings in 60th and 70th). But when national party began to insist that state parties would be generally alike and similar to national one - party problems in many states (especially - Southern) aggravated immnesely. When i began to study American elections Mississippi Democratic party was VERY different from New York's (what's only natural), now they are almost the same. But what sells good in New York is a tough sell in Mississippi....
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,074
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2016, 04:02:51 PM »

Some traditions die very hard. Others don't.
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2016, 10:27:10 AM »

Scott actually has power in Vermont unlike Baker in MA because the state house is close enough that the Republicans there can uphold his vetos if decides to veto anything. I don't think Scott seems to be much of a guy that wants to veto anything though.

I imagine he will literally be quiet as a mouse through 2018 and probably skate to a quiet but larger victory in 2018. 2020 will be where the Democrats have a chance to knock him off.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 15, 2016, 10:41:18 AM »

Scott actually has power in Vermont unlike Baker in MA because the state house is close enough that the Republicans there can uphold his vetos if decides to veto anything. I don't think Scott seems to be much of a guy that wants to veto anything though.

I imagine he will literally be quiet as a mouse through 2018 and probably skate to a quiet but larger victory in 2018. 2020 will be where the Democrats have a chance to knock him off.

I don't expect him to be "quiet as a mouse". He isn't a bombastic type, sure, but he has his own convictions and may be very stubborn if neccessary. In addition - almost all Republicans in state legislature are more conservative then he is (many - substantially), so if he REALLY decides to veto something, their support is almost guaranteed... So, no, he will not be "a king, who rules but doesn't governs.."
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,030
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2016, 12:46:36 PM »

Those of us who aren't PVI nerds understand that politics are still local some places.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: November 15, 2016, 12:58:02 PM »

Those of us who aren't PVI nerds understand that politics are still local some places.

this too.

Scott was pretty much destined to win - it's what all the polls said.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: November 15, 2016, 02:13:23 PM »

Those of us who aren't PVI nerds understand that politics are still local some places.

this too.

Scott was pretty much destined to win - it's what all the polls said.

Yeah, I don't get why anyone is surprised by this.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 11 queries.