The Official Trump 1.0 Approval Ratings Thread

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Pence will go down after today.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Omgg Clinton still more unpopular than the president what the f**k...

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Can we please remove the "1.0" from the title? The implications are sinister.

And I'll note that during Obama's first term there was no "1.0" in the title.

If anything it might just be a 0.25.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

^^^
And men too, they basically made Trump possible lol.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

A lot of Americans are still getting bamboozled.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Bernie has a closet full of potential scandals, there's just been no incentive for anyone to un-earth them yet. If he runs in 2020, there will be.

TROLOLOL running for president usually uncovers any scandals...Which he just did.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

For the lub of god, Bernie must run in 2020

http://blog.quinnipiac.edu/blog/2013/02/08/hillary-clinton-the-most-popular-national-figure-quinnipiac-national-poll-finds-obama-approval-sinks-after-reelection/

There's no way Clinton has 60%+ favorability.

It's a poll from 2013 haha. My point is Clinton had similarly high favorability numbers to Bernie four years ago.

Not every politician who runs for President had such a dip in popularity as Clinton's has. She basically holds the record.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Bernie has a closet full of potential scandals, there's just been no incentive for anyone to un-earth them yet. If he runs in 2020, there will be.

TROLOLOL running for president usually uncovers any scandals...Which he just did.

No one attacked Bernie in 2016, and no one had any reason to. For the Republicans, he served as a helpful diversion for Clinton, and for Clinton, he was never a serious threat to the nomination and she did not want to alienate his supporters (this was probably a mistake, as so many of them, like jfern, idiotically ended up supporting Trump anyway because they are spoiled children, but I digress).

Your candidate lost to a gibbering clown who is mentally unstable. Many people pointed out that this was liable to occur seeing as she was, rightly or wrong, being investigated by the FBI but Clinton supporters tried to talk down this threat, ignoring polling data and public sentiment to support Our Beautiful Nominee. Who are the spoiled children here?

I tend to believe that it's the fault of candidates for not being able to appeal to base voters but, hey, you can call Sanders supporters "spoiled children" if you want (jfern certainly is a spoiled child but he's not really representative). That doesn't change the fact that Clinton lost and that the people you held up as idols are responsible for this. It also doesn't change the fact that you ironically supported Trump for almost a year. This cannot be said about Sanders supporters on the forum.

Plenty of Sanders supporters are spoiled children. Most are not, but Trump-supporters like Jfern are. The Democrats bent over backwards to reach out to people like him, and they chose to live in their absurd fantasy world where DWS's nefarious schemes were the only reason that Saint Bernie lost and rallied behind a right-wing fascist instead.

The ramblings of a deluded man. If you want to stand by your word that NO ONE attacked Bernie in 2016 be my guest. Just goes to show what a troll you are, a useless one at best.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Hell with these numbers, Hillary could beat his ass.

Low favorables are one thing. Low approvals are horrible.

Your as delusional as you were in 2016.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Hell with these numbers, Hillary could beat his ass.

Low favorables are one thing. Low approvals are horrible.

Your as delusional as you were in 2016.

Thats funny coming from you. Do you not remember your behavior here during the primaries?

Ha yes where most of my predictions  turned out to be correct? Warning all not to vote for Clinton while you guys in your arrogance put leftist down while trying to get Republicans on your side. How did that turn out for ya?

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Hell with these numbers, Hillary could beat his ass.

Low favorables are one thing. Low approvals are horrible.

Your as delusional as you were in 2016.

Of course the green leftie is telling me this

Putting down lefties? Good luck on taking back the Senate.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Hell with these numbers, Hillary could beat his ass.

Low favorables are one thing. Low approvals are horrible.

Your as delusional as you were in 2016.

Of course the green leftie is telling me this

Putting down lefties? Good luck on taking back the Senate.

I do have a D avatar, of course. Great observation

Seems that you support the democratic establishment constantly so I really don't see how you can be Indy.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Gallup:

Approve: 39% (+2)
Disapprove: 55 (-3)

Yeah, seems like it was just noise after all.

Eh, the overall trajectory has still be trending towards negative.

Yeah, 39% is still one of his worst numbers. We'll see.

Just when you wonder whether it can get worse for the President... it gets worse.



Gallup: 37% approve, 58% disapprove.

Sure, it could be statistical noise between days.  It isn't getting prettier. 

What a beautiful graph.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

A gold standard pollster, ARG, finds Trump deeply underwater in New Hampshire:

Approve 31%
Disapprove 61%

Hahaha it's ARG but it's seems sadly legit.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Any approvals out of Ohio?

Not yet. Ohio is typically about R+2... and it would be good for calibrating approval for the President. It swung sharply in 2016. I expect Ohio to look bad for President Trump. He suggested that he would create lots of blue-collar jobs -- where are the jobs?

I'd predict it to be around 44-55.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Siena poll of New York:

33% Favorable
63% Unfavorable

Looks like he still has room to decline in NYC.

NY seems to be one of the few states where he has a higher favorability than approval, although that trend seems to exist more Upstate. His approval rating is:

10% Excellent
16% Good
14% Fair
57% Poor

This is how Democrats grab 3-4 House seats from NY.

Good, maybe we can replace the useless IDC Democrats as well.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Hahaha only 8% away from Bush's low point?

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Who cares what the polls say

Trump.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

So basically with Gallup it's this?

[ProgressiveCanadian]

So basically with Gallup it's this?

Delusional.

Just did a universal swing from 2016. See nothing delusional about it.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

So basically with Gallup it's this?

Delusional.

Just did a universal swing from 2016. See nothing delusional about it.

1.) Universal swing isn't a thing, especially since I guess he is much more unpopular in states like CA than in KS. If he's at 70% disapproval in CA and NY, that explains a lot.
2.) You're focusing on one poll (Gallup) and ignoring others (PPP, etc.).
3.) The election is more than three years away. We don't even know who the Democratic candidate will be.
4.) Democrats aren't winning in Tennessee or Kansas.

@Arch: I definitely agree that his numbers are awful (unsurprisingly) - and I disapprove of his presidency as well -, but this map is just nonsense. These landslides are unlikely to happen in a polarized country.

Jesus, do you read anything before posting? I said Gallup at the top (Which has been doing approvals of presidents for quite some time now) of my post, and secondly this in an approval map...idiot.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

FDU poll of New Jersey:

Approve 28% (-9)
Disapprove 61% (+11)

Bahahahaha Bush level collapse confirmed.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Ipos/Reuters...the new Rasmussen?

[ProgressiveCanadian]

I was watching the Trump-Abdullah press conference recently and it was Obama-style.

Did Trump take any meds recently ? He's talking more coherently these days ...

Maybe they put them in his drink.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Wow, an outright majority support regime change in Syria? I guess the Iraq War really is history.

America is turning into the villian like in a movie but this time it's reality.