Louisiana Senate runoff
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:05:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Louisiana Senate runoff
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Louisiana Senate runoff  (Read 1312 times)
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 17, 2016, 05:22:32 PM »

Any chance this is worth keeping an eye on? Conventional wisdom is that Kennedy will win easily, but Campbell does seem like the type of Democrat who could win here in theory (moderate profile).

What would constitute a good result for Democrats? Keeping it within single digits?
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,725


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2016, 05:26:10 PM »

Is Campbell pro-life?  That seems to be the entrance ramp to Democrats being competitive in LA.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2016, 05:31:58 PM »

Is Campbell pro-life?  That seems to be the entrance ramp to Democrats being competitive in LA.

He might be. Pro gun at least
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2016, 05:44:37 PM »

Is Campbell pro-life?  That seems to be the entrance ramp to Democrats being competitive in LA.

Yes: http://www.democratsforlife.org/index.php/component/tags/tag/23-lousiana

However, he is not a friend to the oil industry, to the point where he was Endorsed by the Sierra Club. That's a YUGE liability in LA: http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_bb64c986-8676-11e6-b870-e384c2682c79.html
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2016, 11:49:02 PM »

Is Campbell pro-life?  That seems to be the entrance ramp to Democrats being competitive in LA.

Southern populist. Relatively liberal on economy and substantially more conservative on social issues.
Logged
NeverAgain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,659
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2016, 12:00:55 AM »

Campbell is working closely with the team the put Governor JBE in the Governor's mansion. His team is also mending fences with Fayard and the main Democratic National Establishment. I think this will be a race to watch, and I say this as someone who is donating numerous hours to Campbell.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2016, 01:58:38 AM »

Unless Republicans completely ignore this race, I don't see any real drama here. Kennedy should win rather easily.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2016, 06:15:07 PM »

Is Campbell pro-life?  That seems to be the entrance ramp to Democrats being competitive in LA.

Yes: http://www.democratsforlife.org/index.php/component/tags/tag/23-lousiana

However, he is not a friend to the oil industry, to the point where he was Endorsed by the Sierra Club. That's a YUGE liability in LA: http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_bb64c986-8676-11e6-b870-e384c2682c79.html

He fought the oil companies when they ed up Deepwater Horizon and endangered the livelihoods of Louisianans living on the Gulf. Seems like the sort of thing that should go over well.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2016, 07:58:15 PM »

Democrats decided to waste $5 Million on a recount while Republicans actually shored up Kennedy here. Just god damn idiocy.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2016, 08:02:39 PM »

Democrats decided to waste $5 Million on a recount while Republicans actually shored up Kennedy here. Just god damn idiocy.

Maness or Duke would lose this runoff, and I could see Fleming going down, but no one was ever going to defeat Kennedy (or Boustany).
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2016, 08:23:17 PM »

Democrats decided to waste $5 Million on a recount while Republicans actually shored up Kennedy here. Just god damn idiocy.

Maness or Duke would lose this runoff, and I could see Fleming going down, but no one was ever going to defeat Kennedy (or Boustany).

That's fine - but what's wrong with even trying?
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2016, 08:28:22 PM »

60-40 Kennedy.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2016, 08:30:38 PM »

Democrats decided to waste $5 Million on a recount while Republicans actually shored up Kennedy here. Just god damn idiocy.

Maness or Duke would lose this runoff, and I could see Fleming going down, but no one was ever going to defeat Kennedy (or Boustany).

That's fine - but what's wrong with even trying?

Nothing, except for the fact that dems seem to almost enjoy losing nowadays. But there's no reason to despair over the almost certain result of this race - it was inevitable from the day after the jungle.
Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,392
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2016, 09:27:05 PM »

When it comes down to it the biggest problem for the dems is they write off too many state level races in deep red areas while the reps don't. If NY or Cali can have R governor or Senator then Georgia or Texas can have a D one. This one is a great example the left has given more money and resources to Jill's recount than this race 
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2016, 09:53:11 PM »

When it comes down to it the biggest problem for the dems is they write off too many state level races in deep red areas while the reps don't. If NY or Cali can have R governor or Senator then Georgia or Texas can have a D one. This one is a great example the left has given more money and resources to Jill's recount than this race 

I'm not even sure about this anymore. It's just a sad state of affairs.
Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,392
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2016, 10:52:45 PM »

Uh, since when are NY or CA willing to vote for a Republican governor or Senator?
George Pataki and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2016, 10:56:39 PM »

Uh, since when are NY or CA willing to vote for a Republican governor or Senator?
George Pataki and Arnold Schwarzenegger

George Pataki's last election win was in 2002, Schwarznegger in 2006. Not all that recent.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,281
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2016, 10:59:05 PM »

Uh, since when are NY or CA willing to vote for a Republican governor or Senator?

California's 2010 Senate race was pretty competitive based on the polls, and they had a Republican governor as recently as then.

(It's basically gone the direction of Arkansas now - in the opposite direction.)
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 01, 2016, 01:42:55 PM »

58-42 for Kennedy
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,030
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 01, 2016, 05:45:42 PM »

This race isn't looking good for Democrats... still predicting a 56/44 Kennedy victory.

Trump won 58%-38%.  White Southern Democrats are alive!!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 11 queries.