Clinton electors lobbying for EC protest votes? *UPDATE* 29 electors want intel briefing (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:43:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Clinton electors lobbying for EC protest votes? *UPDATE* 29 electors want intel briefing (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton electors lobbying for EC protest votes? *UPDATE* 29 electors want intel briefing  (Read 11190 times)
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


« on: December 01, 2016, 02:15:17 PM »

would be more "effective" if 10 or 20 republican electors would write on someone else ...not HRC... Wink
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2016, 09:10:49 PM »

The Electoral College system gives more influence to smaller states, and a better balance for Presidential elections.

not really....

i don't care much about the EC (since the majority of states or politicans seems to prefer it....pick your poison)....but the only question is WHICH states are important.

in fact the EC doesn't give power to small states - but a handful of lucky possible swing states, while the majority of small states gets ignored like the overwhelming majority of all american votes.

on the positive side...now that iowa becomes hard-titanium-R, the ethanol subsidies are going to disappear.....and maybe the "first in the nation" status too.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2016, 12:23:20 AM »

to make being faithless possible was the whole point of creating the EC, wasn't it?
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2016, 09:11:38 PM »

All Russian hacking talk is strictly non-election rigging stuff right? As in they selectively hacked and leaked info, but didn't engage in actual vote manipulation to directly affect the outcome.
Russians throwing their voice into the cacophonous noise of an election...meh, so what?  Is there something inherently threatening about Russian fake news than say, John Harwood's fake news?

according to the founding fathers, yes.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2016, 12:27:50 PM »

If the liberals wanted Romney, they had a chance to vote for Romney 4 years ago.

supply and demand.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2016, 02:48:51 PM »

So, the Russians hacked the DNC and the RNC. They only aired the DNC's dirty laundry.

You expressed a terminological inexactitude.  RNC was not hacked.  Per FBI via RNC Chairman.

Where are you getting this fake news that the RNC was hacked?

why should anyone believe anything from the known professional liars in team trump?

they have proven again and again they don't even try to be honest and waltz through with any narrative through baffling their opponents.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.