Who would you vote for in this hypothetical election:
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 09:54:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Who would you vote for in this hypothetical election:
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for
#1
Republican Economic Policies mixed with Obama's Foreign Policy
 
#2
Democratic Economic Policies mixed with Bush's Foreign Policy
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 25

Author Topic: Who would you vote for in this hypothetical election:  (Read 544 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,659


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 23, 2016, 02:42:23 PM »

I go with option one
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,014
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2016, 02:44:38 PM »

The foreign policies aren't night and day different, so obviously the Republican economic policies...
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2016, 02:52:52 PM »

Abstain, couldn't ask for two worse options than these.

Democratic economic policies haven't truly existed since Nixon anyway if we're being generous.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,872


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2016, 04:00:40 PM »

Option 2. Aside from a singular one-time mistake, Bush's foreign policy was acceptable. His second term foreign policy was fine.

Aside from an agreement with Iran whose success is far from assured, Obama's foreign policy has been a disaster. His Russia "reset"? The TPP? Hard to imagine more clear backfires. Russia, China, and North Korea are more aggressive than ever. The Middle East is in shambles. Syria has been a spectacular humanitarian failure. Authoritarianism is on the march all over the world. Our intelligence agencies seem to be suffering from major morale problems. The international order is collapsing. ISIS is in 32 countries, etc. Trump and Pence both effectively savaged the "Obama-Clinton" foreign policy, and with good reason. Why anyone could vote Obama here is strange.
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,624
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2016, 04:44:54 PM »

Option two. No new tax cuts for the rich.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2016, 07:05:42 PM »

If we're talking about Bush's foreign policy on ISIS, then option 2, otherwise abstain.
Logged
Cashew
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,566
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 23, 2016, 07:51:00 PM »

Option two. No new tax cuts for the rich.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2016, 08:17:42 PM »

The foreign policies aren't night and day different, so obviously the Republican economic policies...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.