First Likely Entry Into The 2020 Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:27:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  First Likely Entry Into The 2020 Election
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: First Likely Entry Into The 2020 Election  (Read 1857 times)
History505
Guest
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 26, 2016, 07:48:34 PM »

Who do you think would be the first person to enter the 2020 Presidential Election? Still a few years away, but your very preliminary guess.
Logged
iratemoderate
Rookie
**
Posts: 84
United States


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2016, 07:51:30 PM »

Besides Rocky De La Fuente? :-)
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2016, 08:47:54 PM »

On the Dem side,

O'Malley, Gabbard, or Murphy. Franken and Hickenlooper.... watch them....
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2016, 09:10:44 PM »

O'Malley met with the Iowa delegation at the Democratic National Convention this summer, suggesting that his presidential ambition is still alive.  For that matter, what was the point of him running in 2016, if not to create name recognition for him to capitalize on in the next open Democratic contest?

So I'm assuming that he'll run again, and I guess that makes him the most likely person to announce his candidacy first.  He doesn't have a day job, so what else is he going to do?  All the other most commonly speculated upon candidates already hold public office.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,728
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2016, 09:24:10 PM »

Looking at the first Dem to announce each year:

2016 - Clinton
2008 - Mike Gravel
2004 - Joe Lieberman
2000 - Bill Bradley
1992 - Huh

Sooo.... I suppose I'll guess Booker.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2016, 09:34:29 PM »

Sooo.... I suppose I'll guess Booker.

My hesitation on Booker is how is he going to handle his Senate seat being up in 2020?  I'm assuming he'll run for president, but I'm not sure if he's going to go the John Edwards route and leave the Senate at the end of his term regardless, the Rand Paul route of running for both at once (if that's legal in New Jersey), or the Marco Rubio route of starting out by ruling out another Senate term but then reversing himself if he doesn't win the nomination.

He might try to keep the suspense going for a while by pretending to be undecided on a presidential run for a while as he figures out what to do with his Senate seat.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2016, 11:33:56 PM »

I suspect O'Malley gives a second, hopeless run for President a shot, and is the first to announce to a big "who cares".

The first relevant person to enter? Probably Booker.
Logged
America Needs R'hllor
Parrotguy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,444
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2016, 12:43:28 AM »

Probably O'malley. He seems eager, and eager candidates seem to enter early (e.g. Clinton, Rubio, Cruz). Perhaps Sanders if he decides to run, since I suspedt his almost-win this time made him eager.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2016, 01:06:45 AM »

Donald Trump.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2016, 01:09:27 AM »

O'Malley met with the Iowa delegation at the Democratic National Convention this summer, suggesting that his presidential ambition is still alive.  For that matter, what was the point of him running in 2016, if not to create name recognition for him to capitalize on in the next open Democratic contest?

The point of him running in 2016 was because he wanted to provide non-socialists with an option that wasn't Hillary. Simple as that.

Also this:

Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2016, 05:59:44 AM »

Generally their stance towards the Senate decides whether they'll run- Obama/Rubio/Edwards always hated it, and saw it as a means to an end, whilst Booker actually seems to enjoy being in the Senate.

I doubt that he'll run in 2020
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2016, 01:47:30 PM »

O'Malley met with the Iowa delegation at the Democratic National Convention this summer, suggesting that his presidential ambition is still alive.  For that matter, what was the point of him running in 2016, if not to create name recognition for him to capitalize on in the next open Democratic contest?

The point of him running in 2016 was because he wanted to provide non-socialists with an option that wasn't Hillary. Simple as that.

But it seemed clear from early on that there was no niche for such a candidate.  Though I guess you could say that he was the "in case of emergency, break glass, remove Martin O'Malley" option.  If there had been some huge Clinton scandal (or health problem for that matter) at the last minute, after all the primary filing deadlines had passed, O'Malley was already on the ballot everywhere, and could have been an establishment fallback option.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 27, 2016, 01:55:57 PM »

More interesting to me than who announces first is who starts visiting Iowa and New Hampshire first.  Cruz, Huckabee, Jindal, Paul, Santorum, and O’Malley were already starting to do Iowa and New Hampshire visits in the first half of 2013.  What about this time?  Many prospective candidates, like Cuomo, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, and Warren, are up for reelection in 2018, so maybe they won’t want to look ahead too much by planting their presidential flag too firmly before November ’18.  In general, there are more current officeholders being mentioned as potential candidates this time than there were for ’16, so the process might start more slowly.

Though again, O’Malley is an exception, since he’s already out of office.  So maybe we’ll see him in Iowa again soon.
Logged
History505
Guest
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 27, 2016, 02:01:00 PM »

More interesting to me than who announces first is who starts visiting Iowa and New Hampshire first.  Cruz, Huckabee, Jindal, Paul, Santorum, and O’Malley were already starting to do Iowa and New Hampshire visits in the first half of 2013.  What about this time?  Many prospective candidates, like Cuomo, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, and Warren, are up for reelection in 2018, so maybe they won’t want to look ahead too much by planting their presidential flag too firmly before November ’18.  In general, there are more current officeholders being mentioned as potential candidates this time than there were for ’16, so the process might start more slowly.

Though again, O’Malley is an exception, since he’s already out of office.  So maybe we’ll see him in Iowa again soon.

Good Point.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 27, 2016, 06:27:59 PM »

More interesting to me than who announces first is who starts visiting Iowa and New Hampshire first.  Cruz, Huckabee, Jindal, Paul, Santorum, and O’Malley were already starting to do Iowa and New Hampshire visits in the first half of 2013.  What about this time?  Many prospective candidates, like Cuomo, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, and Warren, are up for reelection in 2018, so maybe they won’t want to look ahead too much by planting their presidential flag too firmly before November ’18.  In general, there are more current officeholders being mentioned as potential candidates this time than there were for ’16, so the process might start more slowly.

Though again, O’Malley is an exception, since he’s already out of office.  So maybe we’ll see him in Iowa again soon.


Gillibrand, Klobuchar, and Warren are in basically no danger of losing their seats, so they have nothing to worry about Re: visiting Iowa/NH in '17. But Cuomo may have to fight to even be renominated for governor, so he'll probably stay home for a while.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 27, 2016, 06:44:25 PM »

Isn't O'Malley basically broke and heavily in debt? I think he'll get a job for at least a year or two before starting to campaign again.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2016, 06:47:32 PM »

Isn't O'Malley basically broke and heavily in debt? I think he'll get a job for at least a year or two before starting to campaign again.

CHECK OUT HIS PLAN
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2016, 07:16:44 PM »

Isn't O'Malley basically broke and heavily in debt? I think he'll get a job for at least a year or two before starting to campaign again.

Knowing O'Malley he'll probably lobby for something horrifying before running for President again pretending he didn't do it.
Logged
BSH
buck_stops_here
Rookie
**
Posts: 35
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 27, 2016, 07:34:45 PM »

Isn't O'Malley basically broke and heavily in debt? I think he'll get a job for at least a year or two before starting to campaign again.

CHECK OUT HIS PLAN

Hold strong at your caucus!
Logged
politics_king
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,591
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2016, 05:38:35 AM »

Most likely Martin O'Malley.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 13 queries.