FL-Gravis: Democrats with slight advantage, but many undecideds
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 07:10:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  FL-Gravis: Democrats with slight advantage, but many undecideds
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FL-Gravis: Democrats with slight advantage, but many undecideds  (Read 1308 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 30, 2016, 03:17:41 PM »

37% Gwen Graham (D)
34% Adam Putnam (R)

44% Gwen Graham (D)
36% Pam Bondi (R)

40% Gwen Graham (D)
29% David Jolly (R)

40% Gwen Graham (D)
32% Jeff Atwater (R)

39% John Morgan (D)
35% Adam Putnam (R)

45% John Morgan (D)
35% Pam Bondi (R)

42% John Morgan (D)
31% David Jolly (R)

41% John Morgan (D)
34% Jeff Atwater (R)

Link.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2016, 03:20:34 PM »

I'm not sure who I'd favor in this scenario - Graham is a conservadem but strikes me as a candidate with less potential landmines than Morgan, but Morgan strikes me as more liberal and more inspiring, and someone who could string conservadems along ANYWAY. I'm kinda leaning towards Morgan if I had to vote today.

also lol @ David Jolly, but really I'm not sure why he's being polled in the first place.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2016, 03:59:01 PM »

Surprised Morgan is doing that well against Putnam. I would expect Putnam to be up against Morgan, who I literally had to google. I'd say this is D+2, but the other numbers do look right. But this far out, with this many undecideds, JUNK POLL!
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2016, 04:22:02 PM »

Surprised Morgan is doing that well against Putnam. I would expect Putnam to be up against Morgan, who I literally had to google. I'd say this is D+2, but the other numbers do look right. But this far out, with this many undecideds, JUNK POLL!

MORGAN AND MORGAN

FOR THE PEOPLE
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2016, 04:55:42 PM »

Surprised Morgan is doing that well against Putnam. I would expect Putnam to be up against Morgan, who I literally had to google. I'd say this is D+2, but the other numbers do look right. But this far out, with this many undecideds, JUNK POLL!

MORGAN AND MORGAN

FOR THE PEOPLE
After doing more searching and reading more about him, apparently Morgan is very visible throughout the state. That explains his name recognition within Florida.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2016, 05:11:47 PM »

Atwater I think is the strongest GOP contender - he's also retiring.

Putnam will be a challenge. I think Graham would counter him better in rural areas than morgan, but I know little of FL politics.

Where's Sanchez at??
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2016, 05:30:05 PM »

Yeah, Graham vs. Morgan is a hard choice for me. Like them both, both have pros and cons. May the best fundraiser win, I guess.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2016, 06:19:33 PM »

Let us all remember Checkpoint Charlie's huge leads before we get excited about anything
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2016, 06:21:57 PM »

It all depends on the I-4 Corridor vote.  I could see Morgan doing very well there.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2016, 10:13:34 PM »

>Gravis
>Bondi outperforming Jolly
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2016, 10:23:06 PM »

>Morgan beating Putnam
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2016, 10:32:25 PM »

D+1

In all seriousness, though, it's way too soon for us to know anything about this race.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2016, 11:10:33 PM »

D+1

In all seriousness, though, it's way too soon for us to know anything about this race.
Let's also remember the democrats haven't won a Florida gubernatorial election since 1994
Logged
Hindsight was 2020
Hindsight is 2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2016, 11:16:04 PM »

Though early I think Morgan will do it between his name recognition, money, and pro-pot stance plus as I suspect there will be a general anti-Trump/anti-Gop mood in 2018
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2016, 11:27:35 PM »

Wasn't the rumor that Graham would run as Morgan's lieutenant gubernatorial choice? Graham's father last held office more than a decade ago (and last fought a sort-of competitive election in 1998, and an actually competitive election in 1986), and she was narrowly elected to one House term in a peripheral part of the state. However impressive that victory was, you still get the impression that Morgan could probably crush her in a primary.
Logged
ajc0918
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,907
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2016, 11:37:14 PM »

John Morgan is attractive as a candidate because he can partially self fund and he has high name recognition. He would do well in the I-4 corridor. Leaning toward John Morgan simply because he is an outsider candidate and if he went up against Putnam/Bondi, I think the establishment vs outsider script would play well for Dems.

I think Graham would do well if she ran for Attorney General or Agriculture Commissioner.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 01, 2016, 03:06:27 PM »

Also remember we're dealing with the FDP
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 01, 2016, 05:30:05 PM »

John Morgan is attractive as a candidate because he can partially self fund and he has high name recognition. He would do well in the I-4 corridor. Leaning toward John Morgan simply because he is an outsider candidate and if he went up against Putnam/Bondi, I think the establishment vs outsider script would play well for Dems.

I think Graham would do well if she ran for Attorney General or Agriculture Commissioner.
Graham is qualified for either AG job.

Could De La Fuente run for Treasurer?

Other statewide offices:
Treasurer: Rocky De La Fuente, John Morgan
Attorney General: Reginald Luster, Pam Keith
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,612
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 01, 2016, 08:43:57 PM »

I definitely have Dems winning NV, NM, IL, WI, PA, CO, MI, ME, NJ and VA. But polls this far out tend to favor Dems and when the election comes, then Dems underperform. Not ready to call this. Especially in FL and we don't know much about Graham as far as a candidate for Gov.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2016, 07:34:17 PM »

Its the Ds year in Florida. In 2014, they had Obma's 6 year itch. In 2010, they had the TEA Party thing. Both times they lost by 1. In 2006, Republicans won because they ran someone who is now a Congressional Democrat. In 2002, there was 9/11, and in 1998, the Bush name was at its highest level of prestige.
Logged
Bigby
Mod_Libertarian_GOPer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,164
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: 3.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2016, 07:57:22 PM »

If the FDP can't win with a Conservadem, then Florida might as well become a one party state. They've lost the last five terms.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,659
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 05, 2016, 10:15:21 AM »

Way way early. Remember how Rick “the climate change denier” Scott was doing until two weeks before the last election?
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,030
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 05, 2016, 06:49:59 PM »

As someone who lives in the I-4 corridor, John Morgan would do Phenomenal here, he's like a GOD to people here.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 08, 2016, 07:11:13 PM »

Its the Ds year in Florida. In 2014, they had Obma's 6 year itch. In 2010, they had the TEA Party thing. Both times they lost by 1. In 2006, Republicans won because they ran someone who is now a Congressional Democrat. In 2002, there was 9/11, and in 1998, the Bush name was at its highest level of prestige.

FDP here to politely tell you you're wrong. Also your 2006 logic is stupid.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 12 queries.