After this election will states, especially ones with republican trifectas. Change recount laws to require standing, proof of fraud, reduce the raw vote total needed for a recount, or give a shorter window of time for a recount to be requested to a fringe candidate with no standing cannot cost the state taxpayer money in a cynical fundraising push?
You do realize that Stein had to raise the money to pay for the recount, don't you? (If the existing law doesn't actually charge enuf to cover the costs, then perhaps that part needs modification.) That said, if South Carolina's automatic recount law was in effect in Michigan, the margin there is close enuf to trigger one.
