Rhode Island: David Cicilline vs. James Langevin
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 01:36:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Rhode Island: David Cicilline vs. James Langevin
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would win the Democratic primary in 2022? Who would you support?
#1
Cicilline / Cicilline
#2
Cicilline / Langevin
#3
Langevin / Langevin
#4
Langevin / Cicilline
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Rhode Island: David Cicilline vs. James Langevin  (Read 1184 times)
Kerrington
Rookie
**
Posts: 48


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 03, 2016, 08:52:32 PM »

Rhode Island is likely to lose its second congressional district, thus finally ending its enormous overrepresentation in both the House of Representatives and the Electoral College.

RI's 1st district has been represented by David Cicilline since 2010, and James Langevin has been the representative for RI's 2nd district since 2000; both won re-election this year.

Put the case that both Democrats will win the next two elections and both will want to hold their House seat in 2022, after both congressional districts have been merged. Who will win the Democratic primary, providing that no third candidate is running?
Logged
NerdyBohemian
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 748
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2016, 09:08:18 PM »

That's a tough one. Tilt Langevin although I much prefer Cicilline.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2016, 10:09:37 PM »

If I recall, one of them is corrupt, but I can't remember which one. Whichever one isn't corrupt.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2016, 10:30:57 PM »

If I recall, one of them is corrupt, but I can't remember which one. Whichever one isn't corrupt.

David is corrupt but James isn't.

David is a massive HP and James is an FF.
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2016, 10:38:11 PM »

Cicilline has a good few skeletons in his closet and I can't imagine him making it Statewide.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2016, 10:51:21 PM »

Voted Option 2, but meant to vote option 4.

Cicilline has a good few skeletons in his closet and I can't imagine him making it Statewide.

Do you mean in the primary or the general? With Cicilline, the general would still be Safe/Likely D even if he underperforms like he does now in RI-1. Langevin would probably win the primary as he tends to overperform generic D in RI-2, and Cicilline tends to underperform generic D in RI-1.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 03, 2016, 11:15:54 PM »

David Cicilline is corrupt and not well liked, and Republicans even recruited a moderate Democrat to switch parties in 2012 and target the seat, but even that failed. Langevin should easily dispatch Cicilline if the two do duke it out. Langevin is one of the better Democrats and while I disagree with him on many things I certainly respect him, so I would support him in the primary. The general would remain Safe D, although if it wasn't losing the second seat, a RI-02 post-Langevin would be interesting with the right Republican.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 03, 2016, 11:20:37 PM »

Langevin/Langevin. Cicilline is pretty much garbage.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 03, 2016, 11:40:13 PM »

Cicilline is corrupt and Langevin is way too moderate.

Anyway, how did Langevin's district vote in the presidential election? I'm sure it voted for Clinton, but it must have been way closer than usual.
Logged
Cynthia
ueutyi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 466
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -3.63

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2016, 08:41:16 PM »

Cicilline is corrupt and Langevin is way too moderate.

Anyway, how did Langevin's district vote in the presidential election? I'm sure it voted for Clinton, but it must have been way closer than usual.
I did some rough calculations based on http://www.ri.gov/election/results/2016/general_election/providence/#. HRC received 119,476 votes in congressional district 2, while DJT got 104,779. So HRC 53.3-DJT 46.7. Cicilline's district voted 63.7% HRC instead.
Logged
GMantis
Dessie Potter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,984
Bulgaria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2016, 12:09:03 PM »

The Democratic dominated legislature actually made the first district even more Democratic during the last redistricting (though it was already substantially more Democratic than the second) supposedly to bolster Cicilline. Which might have backfired in case Langevin retired if running as  a Republican for a RI district in 2018 or 2020 wasn't so pointless.
Logged
coloradocowboi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,630
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2016, 11:56:50 AM »

It bums me out because since Mike Michaud surprisingly lost in '14, the prospects of getting an openly gay man elected at the federal or gubernatorial level has greatly diminished. I don't think there are any good prospects for a long time, and I do wish that I was better represented in our government.

That being said, David Cicilline would be a disaster, and it should obviously be Langevin, so long as Dems can hold his district after.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2016, 12:39:00 PM »

I think what might end up happening is Jack Reed retires in 2020 and one of these two runs for his seat, while the other runs for RI-AL.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 16, 2016, 12:41:15 PM »

I think what might end up happening is Jack Reed retires in 2020 and one of these two runs for his seat, while the other runs for RI-AL.
Nope, redistricting won't take affect until 2022.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 16, 2016, 12:46:28 PM »

I think what might end up happening is Jack Reed retires in 2020 and one of these two runs for his seat, while the other runs for RI-AL.
Nope, redistricting won't take affect until 2022.

I know that. But they know it's going to happen and I suspect they'll plan accordingly, if Reed wants to retire.

Of course, there is that extra House seat from 2020-2022.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 16, 2016, 01:11:02 PM »

I think what might end up happening is Jack Reed retires in 2020 and one of these two runs for his seat, while the other runs for RI-AL.
Nope, redistricting won't take affect until 2022.

I know that. But they know it's going to happen and I suspect they'll plan accordingly, if Reed wants to retire.

Of course, there is that extra House seat from 2020-2022.
Cicilline can't win a statewide primary, and then whoever gets the other House seat becomes a formidable candidate and a possible thorn in he plan. Cicilline's career probably ends soon.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2016, 01:21:12 PM »

I think what might end up happening is Jack Reed retires in 2020 and one of these two runs for his seat, while the other runs for RI-AL.
Nope, redistricting won't take affect until 2022.

I know that. But they know it's going to happen and I suspect they'll plan accordingly, if Reed wants to retire.

Of course, there is that extra House seat from 2020-2022.
Cicilline can't win a statewide primary, and then whoever gets the other House seat becomes a formidable candidate and a possible thorn in he plan. Cicilline's career probably ends soon.

Fair enough.

Maybe Reed dies in 2017, then Cicilline runs in the special election but loses the primary to Peter Kilmartin, who loses the general to Republican State Senator Thomas Paolino, who then loses to a progressive Brown professor in 2020. Then Langevin decides to retire in 2022 anyway. Meanwhile Paolino moves to Connecticut and runs against Richard Blumenthal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 13 queries.