Democrats won't recover the senate until 2022 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:28:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Democrats won't recover the senate until 2022 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrats won't recover the senate until 2022  (Read 4539 times)
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


« on: December 05, 2016, 08:54:50 AM »

If 2022 is a Trump midterm, with 6 more years of demographic movement, the Senate is practically likely D.  PA+NC+GA+FL+AZ+AK should be very doable by then.  Even in a worst case scenario where they only win Clinton states in 2018, that should be enough.

Yes. But - probably not sooner. In 2018 Senate map is atroccious for Democrats and Trump (most likely) will be not too unpopular (it takes time to get there). In 2020 states like AZ and GA will still be at least Lean R. By 2022 - possible.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2016, 09:24:31 AM »

If 2022 is a Trump midterm, with 6 more years of demographic movement, the Senate is practically likely D.  PA+NC+GA+FL+AZ+AK should be very doable by then.  Even in a worst case scenario where they only win Clinton states in 2018, that should be enough.

Yes. But - probably not sooner. In 2018 Senate map is atroccious for Democrats and Trump (most likely) will be not too unpopular (it takes time to get there). In 2020 states like AZ and GA will still be at least Lean R. By 2022 - possible.
Trump is already unpopular it's very and in my opinion likely he will be toxic in 2018

I wouldn't say so. AFAIK - his popularity rose since Nov. 8th, and his unpopularity didn't prevent him from winning. Usually first 2 years are not especially harsh for new president without big scandals (yes, they were for Bill Clinton and Obama, but both times an attempt for broad and not too popular reform was made)...
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2016, 12:56:11 PM »

I wouldn't say so. AFAIK - his popularity rose since Nov. 8th, and his unpopularity didn't prevent him from winning.

All president-elects get a bump, and as for winning, well, again he did have the good fortune of running against the 2nd most disliked candidate in modern history. Trump was associated with bigotry, sexism, being a bully, etc while Clinton was associated with corrupt, elite, establishment, being a liar, etc. It's clear which one Americans cared more about. My point is that between 2 widely loathed candidates, who will win isn't so clear cut.


Usually first 2 years are not especially harsh for new president without big scandals (yes, they were for Bill Clinton and Obama, but both times an attempt for broad and not too popular reform was made)...

Coincidentally, some important Republicans also appear to be in a mood for broad, unpopular reforms.


---

As for topic, this is what I was worried about if Democrats didn't take back the Senate this cycle, and particularly if Clinton also won. We needed a majority to be able to absorb some losses in 2018. We don't have that and now we might be in a hole that will take a few cycles to climb out of.

Agree. But the fact remains: Democrats managed to nominate 2nd most loathed person in US for President, and she did even managed a feat of losing to 1st most loathed)))) Nice work, guys..
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.