Wilson to CNN: Wife not undercover when outed
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:16:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Wilson to CNN: Wife not undercover when outed
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Wilson to CNN: Wife not undercover when outed  (Read 1934 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,757


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 17, 2005, 09:16:51 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 17, 2005, 09:18:51 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

No, her cover was blown when she started dating Wilson. But like I said, the vast majority of the American public don't care about this non-issue/non-story.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,757


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 17, 2005, 09:22:24 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

No, her cover was blown when she started dating Wilson. But like I said, the vast majority of the American public don't care about this non-issue/non-story.

Ummm, no it was blown by reporters.
Anyways, nice of you to call all of the lies that this war was based upon a non-issue. It's the most major issue for me. I want some leaders that I can trust to not start wars for no good reasons, and to not lie repeatedly.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 17, 2005, 09:28:56 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

No, her cover was blown when she started dating Wilson. But like I said, the vast majority of the American public don't care about this non-issue/non-story.

Ummm, no it was blown by reporters.
Anyways, nice of you to call all of the lies that this war was based upon a non-issue. It's the most major issue for me. I want some leaders that I can trust to not start wars for no good reasons, and to not lie repeatedly.

First off, lets clear this out of the way. You are a dumbass. Ok that being established.

Bush did not "lie" to us. The facts stand that Saddam did have WMDs, did coddle and support terrorism (much like yourself). I have supported us finishing that bastard off since the US failed to do its' job the first time around. Bush did not start any war with Iraq. We were already in a state of war when Iraq decided to violate the ceasefire by firing upon our aircraft. So before you continue lying get your f'in facts straight or STFU, kthx.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,757


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 17, 2005, 09:41:22 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown.

So that means no crime was comitted then right? Like I said already, this is a non-story.

Ummm, no
1. Rove was involved with all of the leaks
2. It doesn't make it any less illegal

No, her cover was blown when she started dating Wilson. But like I said, the vast majority of the American public don't care about this non-issue/non-story.

Ummm, no it was blown by reporters.
Anyways, nice of you to call all of the lies that this war was based upon a non-issue. It's the most major issue for me. I want some leaders that I can trust to not start wars for no good reasons, and to not lie repeatedly.

First off, lets clear this out of the way. You are a dumbass. Ok that being established.

Bush did not "lie" to us. The facts stand that Saddam did have WMDs, did coddle and support terrorism (much like yourself). I have supported us finishing that bastard off since the US failed to do its' job the first time around. Bush did not start any war with Iraq. We were already in a state of war when Iraq decided to violate the ceasefire by firing upon our aircraft. So before you continue lying get your f'in facts straight or STFU, kthx.

Where are the WMD, wise guy? I support terrorism? You seem to not think it's a big deal that Bush ignored the 8/06/01 memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US". You are the terrorist supporter.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 17, 2005, 10:03:13 AM »

She wasn't undercover because her identity had already been blown. Another right-wing talking point debunked. I'm very angry at you Republicans for not caring about the integrity of our country, and instead mindlessly repeating talking points that defend Rove and Bush. You hate American, not me.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507150010

There are real questions as to if she was undercover at the time of the Novack column, but my understanding of the statute was if she had been undercover within the past five years and assigned outside of the country.

There is a real question if she is covered by the act, though I have not seen evidence either way.

I cannot, at this point, state that a crime was committed, except the theoretical contempt by Miller.
Logged
Shira
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,858


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: July 18, 2005, 01:56:01 PM »

What this Wilson mess is all about?
The Wilson mess is very simple:

A.   The Bush people badly wanted to go into Iraq from the very beginning in the end of Jan 2001.         (the reason why, is a different story)
B.   They needed a reasonable spin in order to sell this idea to the public.
C.   They found that WMD would be the best spin.
D.   So they invented the “Uranium from Niger”
E.   Wilson was about to be the spoiler of this “Shocking Story”
F.   The only way left was to purge Wilson
G.   And that’s what they tried to do.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: July 18, 2005, 01:57:15 PM »

Wilson is a proven liar.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,757


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: July 18, 2005, 02:07:30 PM »


Prove it
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: July 18, 2005, 02:17:05 PM »


Already done in the other threads on this topic.  Read there.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,757


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: July 18, 2005, 03:29:39 PM »


Already done in the other threads on this topic.  Read there.

Already debunked.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: July 19, 2005, 12:50:22 AM »


Is King Fahd dead yet?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,757


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: July 19, 2005, 07:44:24 AM »


Wow, what a logical argument.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 12 queries.